临床中的药用多药理学--将多药组转化为治疗效果。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pharmaceutical Research Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-16 DOI:10.1007/s11095-024-03656-8
Muhammad Rafehi, Marius Möller, Wouroud Ismail Al-Khalil, Sven Marcel Stefan
{"title":"临床中的药用多药理学--将多药组转化为治疗效果。","authors":"Muhammad Rafehi, Marius Möller, Wouroud Ismail Al-Khalil, Sven Marcel Stefan","doi":"10.1007/s11095-024-03656-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Drugs with multiple targets, often annotated as 'unselective', 'promiscuous', 'multitarget', or 'polypharmacological', are widely considered in both academic and industrial research as a high risk due to the likelihood of adverse effects. However, retrospective analyses have shown that particularly approved drugs bear rich polypharmacological profiles. This raises the question whether our perception of the specificity paradigm ('one drug-one target concept') is correct - and if specifically multitarget drugs should be developed instead of being rejected. These questions provoke a paradigm shift - regarding the development of polypharmacological drugs not as a 'waste of investment', but acknowledging the existence of a 'lack of investment'. This perspective provides an insight into modern drug development highlighting latest drug candidates that have not been assessed in a broader polypharmacology-based context elsewhere embedded in a historic framework of classical and modern approved multitarget drugs. The article shall be an inspiration to the scientific community to re-consider current standards, and more, to evolve to a better understanding of polypharmacology from a challenge to an opportunity.</p>","PeriodicalId":20027,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10927880/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medicinal Polypharmacology in the Clinic - Translating the Polypharmacolome into Therapeutic Benefit.\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Rafehi, Marius Möller, Wouroud Ismail Al-Khalil, Sven Marcel Stefan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11095-024-03656-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Drugs with multiple targets, often annotated as 'unselective', 'promiscuous', 'multitarget', or 'polypharmacological', are widely considered in both academic and industrial research as a high risk due to the likelihood of adverse effects. However, retrospective analyses have shown that particularly approved drugs bear rich polypharmacological profiles. This raises the question whether our perception of the specificity paradigm ('one drug-one target concept') is correct - and if specifically multitarget drugs should be developed instead of being rejected. These questions provoke a paradigm shift - regarding the development of polypharmacological drugs not as a 'waste of investment', but acknowledging the existence of a 'lack of investment'. This perspective provides an insight into modern drug development highlighting latest drug candidates that have not been assessed in a broader polypharmacology-based context elsewhere embedded in a historic framework of classical and modern approved multitarget drugs. The article shall be an inspiration to the scientific community to re-consider current standards, and more, to evolve to a better understanding of polypharmacology from a challenge to an opportunity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20027,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmaceutical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10927880/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmaceutical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-024-03656-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-024-03656-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

具有多个靶点的药物通常被注释为 "非选择性"、"杂合性"、"多靶点 "或 "多药理",在学术研究和工业研究中被广泛认为是高风险药物,因为很可能产生不良反应。然而,回顾性分析表明,特别是已获批准的药物具有丰富的多药理特征。这就提出了一个问题:我们对特异性范式("一药一靶点概念")的认识是否正确?这些问题引发了范式的转变--多药理药物的开发不是 "投资浪费",而是承认 "投资不足 "的存在。这一观点为现代药物开发提供了一个视角,突出了在经典和现代已获批准的多靶点药物历史框架内,尚未在更广泛的多药理学背景下进行评估的最新候选药物。这篇文章将激励科学界重新考虑当前的标准,进而更好地理解多药理学,将挑战转化为机遇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Medicinal Polypharmacology in the Clinic - Translating the Polypharmacolome into Therapeutic Benefit.

Drugs with multiple targets, often annotated as 'unselective', 'promiscuous', 'multitarget', or 'polypharmacological', are widely considered in both academic and industrial research as a high risk due to the likelihood of adverse effects. However, retrospective analyses have shown that particularly approved drugs bear rich polypharmacological profiles. This raises the question whether our perception of the specificity paradigm ('one drug-one target concept') is correct - and if specifically multitarget drugs should be developed instead of being rejected. These questions provoke a paradigm shift - regarding the development of polypharmacological drugs not as a 'waste of investment', but acknowledging the existence of a 'lack of investment'. This perspective provides an insight into modern drug development highlighting latest drug candidates that have not been assessed in a broader polypharmacology-based context elsewhere embedded in a historic framework of classical and modern approved multitarget drugs. The article shall be an inspiration to the scientific community to re-consider current standards, and more, to evolve to a better understanding of polypharmacology from a challenge to an opportunity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmaceutical Research
Pharmaceutical Research 医学-化学综合
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.40%
发文量
276
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: Pharmaceutical Research, an official journal of the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists, is committed to publishing novel research that is mechanism-based, hypothesis-driven and addresses significant issues in drug discovery, development and regulation. Current areas of interest include, but are not limited to: -(pre)formulation engineering and processing- computational biopharmaceutics- drug delivery and targeting- molecular biopharmaceutics and drug disposition (including cellular and molecular pharmacology)- pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and pharmacogenetics. Research may involve nonclinical and clinical studies, and utilize both in vitro and in vivo approaches. Studies on small drug molecules, pharmaceutical solid materials (including biomaterials, polymers and nanoparticles) biotechnology products (including genes, peptides, proteins and vaccines), and genetically engineered cells are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Population Pharmacokinetics of Casirivimab and Imdevimab in Pediatric and Adult Non-Infected Individuals, Pediatric and Adult Ambulatory or Hospitalized Patients or Household Contacts of Patients Infected with SARS-COV-2 Retraction Note: Verapamil Inhibits Ser202/Thr205 Phosphorylation of Tau by Blocking TXNIP/ROS/p38 MAPK Pathway. The Use of Systemically Absorbed Drugs to Explore An In Vitro Bioequivalence Approach For Comparing Non-Systemically Absorbed Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients in Drug Products For Use in Dogs Correction: Development of a New Dry Powder Aerosol Synthetic Lung Surfactant Product for Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) - Part I: In Vitro Testing and Characterization. Development of a New Dry Powder Aerosol Synthetic Lung Surfactant Product for Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) - Part II: In vivo Efficacy Testing in a Rabbit Surfactant Washout Model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1