β-钛合金与表面处理。其抗菌活性提高了多少?系统综述

Juliana Dias Corpa Tardelli, Hian Parize, Andréa Cândido dos Reis
{"title":"β-钛合金与表面处理。其抗菌活性提高了多少?系统综述","authors":"Juliana Dias Corpa Tardelli,&nbsp;Hian Parize,&nbsp;Andréa Cândido dos Reis","doi":"10.1016/j.dentre.2024.100079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Beta titanium (β-Ti) alloys have shown promising outcomes in recent years, but whether they have intrinsic antimicrobial activity is unclear. So the objective was to assess the existing literature and answer “Do surface treatments applied to beta titanium alloys for implants present statistically significant results for antimicrobial activity when compared to the control group?”.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. The personalized search strategy was applied to Embase, PubMed, Science Direct, and Scopus. Experimental in vitro studies that evaluated the influence of surface treatments on β-Ti alloys to improve antimicrobial activity without the restriction of time and language were included. The risk of bias was assessed by Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) adapted tool.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>690 articles were found, and after the removal of duplicates, 642 remained. Nineteen were selected for full-text reading, and two were selected from their reference lists. Eight of them met the eligibility criteria and were included. Quantitative analysis was not performed due to the heterogeneity of the studies. All studies had a low risk of bias.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>All treatments evaluated provided a statistically significant improvement in antimicrobial activity with a significant reduction in bacterial adhesion despite the heterogeneity of the studies. Current literature presents three groups of surface treatment for beta titanium alloys: 1. Implantation of antimicrobial ion, 2. Bioactive polymers with antibiotics, and 3. Non-antimicrobial surface treatments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100364,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Review","volume":"4 1","pages":"Article 100079"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772559624000026/pdfft?md5=adeded5bd75af877775ff6cc007b096d&pid=1-s2.0-S2772559624000026-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beta-titanium alloys versus surface treatment. How much does it improve their antimicrobial activity? A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Juliana Dias Corpa Tardelli,&nbsp;Hian Parize,&nbsp;Andréa Cândido dos Reis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dentre.2024.100079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Beta titanium (β-Ti) alloys have shown promising outcomes in recent years, but whether they have intrinsic antimicrobial activity is unclear. So the objective was to assess the existing literature and answer “Do surface treatments applied to beta titanium alloys for implants present statistically significant results for antimicrobial activity when compared to the control group?”.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. The personalized search strategy was applied to Embase, PubMed, Science Direct, and Scopus. Experimental in vitro studies that evaluated the influence of surface treatments on β-Ti alloys to improve antimicrobial activity without the restriction of time and language were included. The risk of bias was assessed by Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) adapted tool.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>690 articles were found, and after the removal of duplicates, 642 remained. Nineteen were selected for full-text reading, and two were selected from their reference lists. Eight of them met the eligibility criteria and were included. Quantitative analysis was not performed due to the heterogeneity of the studies. All studies had a low risk of bias.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>All treatments evaluated provided a statistically significant improvement in antimicrobial activity with a significant reduction in bacterial adhesion despite the heterogeneity of the studies. Current literature presents three groups of surface treatment for beta titanium alloys: 1. Implantation of antimicrobial ion, 2. Bioactive polymers with antibiotics, and 3. Non-antimicrobial surface treatments.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dentistry Review\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100079\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772559624000026/pdfft?md5=adeded5bd75af877775ff6cc007b096d&pid=1-s2.0-S2772559624000026-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dentistry Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772559624000026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772559624000026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 贝塔钛(β-Ti)合金近年来显示出良好的效果,但其是否具有内在抗菌活性尚不清楚。因此,本研究旨在评估现有文献,并回答 "与对照组相比,对植入物用β钛合金进行的表面处理是否具有显著的抗菌活性?在 Embase、PubMed、Science Direct 和 Scopus 中采用了个性化检索策略。纳入了评估β-钛合金表面处理对提高抗菌活性的影响的体外实验研究,这些研究不受时间和语言的限制。结果 共找到 690 篇文章,去除重复文章后,剩下 642 篇。其中 19 篇被选中进行全文阅读,2 篇从参考文献列表中选取。其中 8 篇符合资格标准并被纳入。由于研究的异质性,没有进行定量分析。结论 尽管研究存在异质性,但所有评估的治疗方法在抗菌活性方面都有统计学意义上的显著改善,并能显著减少细菌粘附。目前的文献显示,β钛合金的表面处理分为三类:1.植入抗菌离子;2. 含有抗生素的生物活性聚合物;3.非抗菌表面处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Beta-titanium alloys versus surface treatment. How much does it improve their antimicrobial activity? A systematic review

Purpose

Beta titanium (β-Ti) alloys have shown promising outcomes in recent years, but whether they have intrinsic antimicrobial activity is unclear. So the objective was to assess the existing literature and answer “Do surface treatments applied to beta titanium alloys for implants present statistically significant results for antimicrobial activity when compared to the control group?”.

Methods

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. The personalized search strategy was applied to Embase, PubMed, Science Direct, and Scopus. Experimental in vitro studies that evaluated the influence of surface treatments on β-Ti alloys to improve antimicrobial activity without the restriction of time and language were included. The risk of bias was assessed by Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) adapted tool.

Results

690 articles were found, and after the removal of duplicates, 642 remained. Nineteen were selected for full-text reading, and two were selected from their reference lists. Eight of them met the eligibility criteria and were included. Quantitative analysis was not performed due to the heterogeneity of the studies. All studies had a low risk of bias.

Conclusion

All treatments evaluated provided a statistically significant improvement in antimicrobial activity with a significant reduction in bacterial adhesion despite the heterogeneity of the studies. Current literature presents three groups of surface treatment for beta titanium alloys: 1. Implantation of antimicrobial ion, 2. Bioactive polymers with antibiotics, and 3. Non-antimicrobial surface treatments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Soft tissue management as part of peri‑implantitis treatment: When, why and how? Engineered Small Extra-Cellular Vesicles for Endogenous Mesenchymal Stem Cells Recruitment and in situ Periodontal Tissue Regeneration Periodontitis Gingival Tissue Exosomes Cross and Compromise Human BBB in an In-Vitro 3D Model The Use of Phage Therapy in Reduction of Oral Cavity Bacteria: A Literature Review Will CAD/CAM Technology Increase the Effectiveness of Clinicians?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1