Md Mintu Miah , Kate Kyung Hyun , Stephen P Mattingly
{"title":"自行车容量预测研究综述","authors":"Md Mintu Miah , Kate Kyung Hyun , Stephen P Mattingly","doi":"10.1080/19427867.2024.2310831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>No previous research provided a comprehensive review of the bicycle volume estimation techniques assessing the current research gaps in data and modeling makes it challenging to understand the most effective and accurate strategies to estimate bicycle volumes. This article provides a detailed review of 58 studies published from 1996 to 2021. The review results indicate that conventional modeling approaches such as Linear regression, Negative Binomial, Poisson regressions, and a factor-up method represent the most popular econometric statistical models for bicycle volume estimation, while a decision tree is popular among machine-learning-based techniques due to its simplicity and ease of application, interpretation, and estimation with small data sets. In addition, Strava data, Socio-demographic variables, and bicycle facilities significantly contribute to the predictions. The study documents the current research gaps and recommends future research directions to improve data source evaluations, variable creations, modeling, and scalability/transferability advancements.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48974,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Letters-The International Journal of Transportation Research","volume":"16 10","pages":"Pages 1406-1433"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A review of bike volume prediction studies\",\"authors\":\"Md Mintu Miah , Kate Kyung Hyun , Stephen P Mattingly\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19427867.2024.2310831\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>No previous research provided a comprehensive review of the bicycle volume estimation techniques assessing the current research gaps in data and modeling makes it challenging to understand the most effective and accurate strategies to estimate bicycle volumes. This article provides a detailed review of 58 studies published from 1996 to 2021. The review results indicate that conventional modeling approaches such as Linear regression, Negative Binomial, Poisson regressions, and a factor-up method represent the most popular econometric statistical models for bicycle volume estimation, while a decision tree is popular among machine-learning-based techniques due to its simplicity and ease of application, interpretation, and estimation with small data sets. In addition, Strava data, Socio-demographic variables, and bicycle facilities significantly contribute to the predictions. The study documents the current research gaps and recommends future research directions to improve data source evaluations, variable creations, modeling, and scalability/transferability advancements.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Letters-The International Journal of Transportation Research\",\"volume\":\"16 10\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1406-1433\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Letters-The International Journal of Transportation Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S1942786724000055\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Letters-The International Journal of Transportation Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S1942786724000055","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
No previous research provided a comprehensive review of the bicycle volume estimation techniques assessing the current research gaps in data and modeling makes it challenging to understand the most effective and accurate strategies to estimate bicycle volumes. This article provides a detailed review of 58 studies published from 1996 to 2021. The review results indicate that conventional modeling approaches such as Linear regression, Negative Binomial, Poisson regressions, and a factor-up method represent the most popular econometric statistical models for bicycle volume estimation, while a decision tree is popular among machine-learning-based techniques due to its simplicity and ease of application, interpretation, and estimation with small data sets. In addition, Strava data, Socio-demographic variables, and bicycle facilities significantly contribute to the predictions. The study documents the current research gaps and recommends future research directions to improve data source evaluations, variable creations, modeling, and scalability/transferability advancements.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Letters: The International Journal of Transportation Research is a quarterly journal that publishes high-quality peer-reviewed and mini-review papers as well as technical notes and book reviews on the state-of-the-art in transportation research.
The focus of Transportation Letters is on analytical and empirical findings, methodological papers, and theoretical and conceptual insights across all areas of research. Review resource papers that merge descriptions of the state-of-the-art with innovative and new methodological, theoretical, and conceptual insights spanning all areas of transportation research are invited and of particular interest.