监测降水分布不均情况下高粱和玉米的抗旱机制

IF 2.1 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY International Journal of Plant Production Pub Date : 2024-02-13 DOI:10.1007/s42106-023-00278-9
Nicole Frantová, Michal Rábek, Lenka Porčová, Ivana Jovanović, Petr Širůček, Vojtěch Lukas, Josef Hájek, Petr Elzner, Ludmila Holková, Pavlína Smutná, Vladimír Smutný, Tomáš Středa, Radim Cerkal
{"title":"监测降水分布不均情况下高粱和玉米的抗旱机制","authors":"Nicole Frantová, Michal Rábek, Lenka Porčová, Ivana Jovanović, Petr Širůček, Vojtěch Lukas, Josef Hájek, Petr Elzner, Ludmila Holková, Pavlína Smutná, Vladimír Smutný, Tomáš Středa, Radim Cerkal","doi":"10.1007/s42106-023-00278-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The study examines the morpho-physiological differences in leaf characteristics between two species of C4 plants: sorghum and maize. The research was conducted in field conditions where plants were rainfed. Both species different varieties were cultivated at two distinct sites that exhibited variations in soil texture and drought stress incidence according to the vegetation condition index (VCI). Samples were collected during various growth stages to analyze the relative water content (RWC), proline levels, and stomatal density. Sorghum plants displayed higher RWC, proline levels, and stomatal density than maize plants. In sorghum, the biochemical traits, such as the proline content, may play a more critical role in withstanding water-limited conditions than in maize in our experiment. Under the same water restriction period, sorghum showed higher RWC levels. Sorghum plants reduced stomatal density under more water-limited conditions, which proves its plasticity. Additionally, early maturation played a crucial role in both species. The early sorghum variety KWS Kallisto and maize variety Walterinio KWS had a more stable yield at both sites. Nevertheless, the highest yields were found in the later varieties, KWS Hannibal and KWS Inteligens. The higher proline levels and the relative water content are drought-tolerant mechanisms and may be used to indicate drought intensity in field conditions. Our findings spotlight the influence of genetic diversity and genotype-environment interactions in determining crop responses to drought stress, providing valuable information for future breeding programs to enhance drought tolerance in crops.</p>","PeriodicalId":54947,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Plant Production","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monitoring Drought Tolerance Mechanisms of Sorghum and Maize Under Unevenly Distributed Precipitation\",\"authors\":\"Nicole Frantová, Michal Rábek, Lenka Porčová, Ivana Jovanović, Petr Širůček, Vojtěch Lukas, Josef Hájek, Petr Elzner, Ludmila Holková, Pavlína Smutná, Vladimír Smutný, Tomáš Středa, Radim Cerkal\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s42106-023-00278-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The study examines the morpho-physiological differences in leaf characteristics between two species of C4 plants: sorghum and maize. The research was conducted in field conditions where plants were rainfed. Both species different varieties were cultivated at two distinct sites that exhibited variations in soil texture and drought stress incidence according to the vegetation condition index (VCI). Samples were collected during various growth stages to analyze the relative water content (RWC), proline levels, and stomatal density. Sorghum plants displayed higher RWC, proline levels, and stomatal density than maize plants. In sorghum, the biochemical traits, such as the proline content, may play a more critical role in withstanding water-limited conditions than in maize in our experiment. Under the same water restriction period, sorghum showed higher RWC levels. Sorghum plants reduced stomatal density under more water-limited conditions, which proves its plasticity. Additionally, early maturation played a crucial role in both species. The early sorghum variety KWS Kallisto and maize variety Walterinio KWS had a more stable yield at both sites. Nevertheless, the highest yields were found in the later varieties, KWS Hannibal and KWS Inteligens. The higher proline levels and the relative water content are drought-tolerant mechanisms and may be used to indicate drought intensity in field conditions. Our findings spotlight the influence of genetic diversity and genotype-environment interactions in determining crop responses to drought stress, providing valuable information for future breeding programs to enhance drought tolerance in crops.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Plant Production\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Plant Production\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42106-023-00278-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Plant Production","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42106-023-00278-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该研究探讨了高粱和玉米这两种 C4 植物叶片特征的形态生理学差异。研究在雨水灌溉的田间条件下进行。根据植被状况指数(VCI),这两种植物的不同品种在土壤质地和干旱胁迫发生率不同的两个不同地点种植。在不同的生长阶段采集样本,分析相对含水量(RWC)、脯氨酸水平和气孔密度。高粱植株的相对含水量、脯氨酸含量和气孔密度均高于玉米植株。在我们的实验中,高粱的生化性状(如脯氨酸含量)在抵御水分限制条件方面可能比玉米发挥着更关键的作用。在相同的水分限制条件下,高粱的 RWC 水平更高。在更多的水分限制条件下,高粱植株降低了气孔密度,这证明了它的可塑性。此外,早熟在这两个品种中都起到了至关重要的作用。早熟高粱品种 KWS Kallisto 和玉米品种 Walterinio KWS 在两地的产量都比较稳定。不过,产量最高的还是晚熟品种 KWS Hannibal 和 KWS Inteligens。较高的脯氨酸水平和相对含水量是抗旱机制,可用于指示田间条件下的干旱强度。我们的研究结果凸显了遗传多样性和基因型-环境相互作用在决定作物对干旱胁迫反应方面的影响,为未来提高作物耐旱性的育种计划提供了宝贵的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Monitoring Drought Tolerance Mechanisms of Sorghum and Maize Under Unevenly Distributed Precipitation

The study examines the morpho-physiological differences in leaf characteristics between two species of C4 plants: sorghum and maize. The research was conducted in field conditions where plants were rainfed. Both species different varieties were cultivated at two distinct sites that exhibited variations in soil texture and drought stress incidence according to the vegetation condition index (VCI). Samples were collected during various growth stages to analyze the relative water content (RWC), proline levels, and stomatal density. Sorghum plants displayed higher RWC, proline levels, and stomatal density than maize plants. In sorghum, the biochemical traits, such as the proline content, may play a more critical role in withstanding water-limited conditions than in maize in our experiment. Under the same water restriction period, sorghum showed higher RWC levels. Sorghum plants reduced stomatal density under more water-limited conditions, which proves its plasticity. Additionally, early maturation played a crucial role in both species. The early sorghum variety KWS Kallisto and maize variety Walterinio KWS had a more stable yield at both sites. Nevertheless, the highest yields were found in the later varieties, KWS Hannibal and KWS Inteligens. The higher proline levels and the relative water content are drought-tolerant mechanisms and may be used to indicate drought intensity in field conditions. Our findings spotlight the influence of genetic diversity and genotype-environment interactions in determining crop responses to drought stress, providing valuable information for future breeding programs to enhance drought tolerance in crops.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: IJPP publishes original research papers and review papers related to physiology, ecology and production of field crops and forages at field, farm and landscape level. Preferred topics are: (1) yield gap in cropping systems: estimation, causes and closing measures, (2) ecological intensification of plant production, (3) improvement of water and nutrients management in plant production systems, (4) environmental impact of plant production, (5) climate change and plant production, and (6) responses of plant communities to extreme weather conditions. Please note that IJPP does not publish papers with a background in genetics and plant breeding, plant molecular biology, plant biotechnology, as well as soil science, meteorology, product process and post-harvest management unless they are strongly related to plant production under field conditions. Papers based on limited data or of local importance, and results from routine experiments will not normally be considered for publication. Field experiments should include at least two years and/or two environments. Papers on plants other than field crops and forages, and papers based on controlled-environment experiments will not be considered.
期刊最新文献
Prediction of the Climatically Suitable Areas of Rice in China Based on Optimized MaxEnt Model Conservation Tillage Enhances Energy Efficiency and Mitigates Carbon Footprint and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Long-Term Wheat Production Trials in the Western Indo-Gangetic Plain of India Seed Priming Boosts Plant Growth, Yield Attributes, Seed Chemical and Antioxidant Composition in Lentil under Low-Phosphorus Field Conditions Conservation Tillage and In-Situ Rice Residue Driven soil Temperature Moderation and Wheat Productivity under Terminal Heat Stress in North-Western Indo Gangetic Plains of India Integrating Nano-Fertilizers with Mineral-Based Nutrients for Growth, Energy Efficiency, Economics, and Environmental Sustainability in Wheat crop
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1