社区对森林的依赖:以印度东部的经验证据重新审视既定思想

IF 2.6 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY European Journal of Forest Research Pub Date : 2024-02-17 DOI:10.1007/s10342-024-01659-z
Somnath Ghosal, Tarun Goswami
{"title":"社区对森林的依赖:以印度东部的经验证据重新审视既定思想","authors":"Somnath Ghosal, Tarun Goswami","doi":"10.1007/s10342-024-01659-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The distance between forest and forest villages as a factor has specific importance in designing the interface of forest dependency. Scholars have widely adopted the forest dependency model, which, by indirectly utilising the distance decay principle, can interpret the distance impact on forest dependency. The present empirical study thus attempted to understand how, in the case of Indian forestry, community dependency altered in relation to its distance from the forest. What are the associated elements that shaped such differences, and finally, is it possible for the existing forest dependency model to explain this distance interference using the distance decay principle? In achieving these goals using multiple linear regression, the study tried to understand the impact of distance along with other factors of forest dependency in an Indian protected forest region. Further, using bivariate logistic regression, it identified the differential pattern of dependency in the forest core and fringe villages in association with their purposes and the nature of the collection. Finally, the overall findings revealed a different kind of distance and forest dependency interrelation based on the differential purposes and nature of collections that denied the acceptance of the above-mentioned model and principle in the setting of forest dependency in rural India.</p>","PeriodicalId":11996,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Forest Research","volume":"264 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Community forest dependency: re-examining established thoughts with empirical evidence from Eastern India\",\"authors\":\"Somnath Ghosal, Tarun Goswami\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10342-024-01659-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The distance between forest and forest villages as a factor has specific importance in designing the interface of forest dependency. Scholars have widely adopted the forest dependency model, which, by indirectly utilising the distance decay principle, can interpret the distance impact on forest dependency. The present empirical study thus attempted to understand how, in the case of Indian forestry, community dependency altered in relation to its distance from the forest. What are the associated elements that shaped such differences, and finally, is it possible for the existing forest dependency model to explain this distance interference using the distance decay principle? In achieving these goals using multiple linear regression, the study tried to understand the impact of distance along with other factors of forest dependency in an Indian protected forest region. Further, using bivariate logistic regression, it identified the differential pattern of dependency in the forest core and fringe villages in association with their purposes and the nature of the collection. Finally, the overall findings revealed a different kind of distance and forest dependency interrelation based on the differential purposes and nature of collections that denied the acceptance of the above-mentioned model and principle in the setting of forest dependency in rural India.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Forest Research\",\"volume\":\"264 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Forest Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-024-01659-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Forest Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-024-01659-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

森林与森林村庄之间的距离作为一个因素,在设计森林依存度界面时具有特殊的重要性。学者们广泛采用了森林依存度模型,该模型通过间接利用距离衰减原理,可以解释距离对森林依存度的影响。因此,本实证研究试图了解在印度林业中,社区依存度是如何随其与森林的距离而改变的。形成这种差异的相关因素是什么?最后,现有的森林依赖性模型是否有可能利用距离衰减原理来解释这种距离干扰?为了实现这些目标,本研究使用多元线性回归法,试图了解距离以及其他因素对印度保护林区森林依赖性的影响。此外,研究还利用二元逻辑回归法,确定了森林核心村和边缘村依赖性的不同模式,并将其与采集目的和采集性质联系起来。最后,总体研究结果表明,由于采集的目的和性质不同,距离和森林依赖性之间的相互关系也不同,这就否定了上述模式和原则在印度农村森林依赖性环境中的可接受性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Community forest dependency: re-examining established thoughts with empirical evidence from Eastern India

The distance between forest and forest villages as a factor has specific importance in designing the interface of forest dependency. Scholars have widely adopted the forest dependency model, which, by indirectly utilising the distance decay principle, can interpret the distance impact on forest dependency. The present empirical study thus attempted to understand how, in the case of Indian forestry, community dependency altered in relation to its distance from the forest. What are the associated elements that shaped such differences, and finally, is it possible for the existing forest dependency model to explain this distance interference using the distance decay principle? In achieving these goals using multiple linear regression, the study tried to understand the impact of distance along with other factors of forest dependency in an Indian protected forest region. Further, using bivariate logistic regression, it identified the differential pattern of dependency in the forest core and fringe villages in association with their purposes and the nature of the collection. Finally, the overall findings revealed a different kind of distance and forest dependency interrelation based on the differential purposes and nature of collections that denied the acceptance of the above-mentioned model and principle in the setting of forest dependency in rural India.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6-16 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Forest Research focuses on publishing innovative results of empirical or model-oriented studies which contribute to the development of broad principles underlying forest ecosystems, their functions and services. Papers which exclusively report methods, models, techniques or case studies are beyond the scope of the journal, while papers on studies at the molecular or cellular level will be considered where they address the relevance of their results to the understanding of ecosystem structure and function. Papers relating to forest operations and forest engineering will be considered if they are tailored within a forest ecosystem context.
期刊最新文献
Allometric equations for biomass and carbon pool estimation in short rotation Pinus radiata stands of the Western Cape, South Africa Effect of bedrock, tree size and time on growth and climate sensitivity of Norway spruce in the High Tatras Pure and mixed Scots pine forests showed divergent responses to climate variation and increased intrinsic water use efficiency across a European-wide climate gradient Preliminary validation of automated production analysis of feller buncher operations: integration of onboard computer data with LiDAR inventory Variability in fine root decomposition after forest thinning: effects of harvest intensity and root size
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1