声波方程显式有限差分解法频散分析计算策略概述

IF 6 1区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS Petroleum Science Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.petsci.2024.02.003
{"title":"声波方程显式有限差分解法频散分析计算策略概述","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.petsci.2024.02.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Finite-difference (FD) method is the most extensively employed numerical modeling technique. Nevertheless, when using the FD method to simulate the seismic wave propagation, the large spatial or temporal sampling interval can lead to dispersion errors and numerical instability. In the FD scheme, the key factor in determining both dispersion errors and stability is the selection of the FD weights. Thus, How to obtain appropriate FD weights to guarantee a stable numerical modeling process with minimum dispersion error is critical. The FD weights computation strategies can be classified into three types based on different computational ideologies, window function strategy, optimization strategy, and Taylor expansion strategy. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive overview of these three strategies by presenting their fundamental theories. We conduct a set of comparative analyses of their strengths and weaknesses through various analysis tests and numerical modelings. According to these comparisons, we provide two potential research directions of this field: Firstly, the development of a computational strategy for FD weights that enhances stability; Secondly, obtaining FD weights that exhibit a wide bandwidth while minimizing dispersion errors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19938,"journal":{"name":"Petroleum Science","volume":"21 4","pages":"Pages 2311-2328"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1995822624000396/pdfft?md5=b83e2b723ecfee24aa4bf76004b8903a&pid=1-s2.0-S1995822624000396-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Overview of computation strategies on the dispersion analysis for explicit finite difference solution of acoustic wave equation\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.petsci.2024.02.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Finite-difference (FD) method is the most extensively employed numerical modeling technique. Nevertheless, when using the FD method to simulate the seismic wave propagation, the large spatial or temporal sampling interval can lead to dispersion errors and numerical instability. In the FD scheme, the key factor in determining both dispersion errors and stability is the selection of the FD weights. Thus, How to obtain appropriate FD weights to guarantee a stable numerical modeling process with minimum dispersion error is critical. The FD weights computation strategies can be classified into three types based on different computational ideologies, window function strategy, optimization strategy, and Taylor expansion strategy. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive overview of these three strategies by presenting their fundamental theories. We conduct a set of comparative analyses of their strengths and weaknesses through various analysis tests and numerical modelings. According to these comparisons, we provide two potential research directions of this field: Firstly, the development of a computational strategy for FD weights that enhances stability; Secondly, obtaining FD weights that exhibit a wide bandwidth while minimizing dispersion errors.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Petroleum Science\",\"volume\":\"21 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 2311-2328\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1995822624000396/pdfft?md5=b83e2b723ecfee24aa4bf76004b8903a&pid=1-s2.0-S1995822624000396-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Petroleum Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1995822624000396\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Petroleum Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1995822624000396","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有限差分法(FD)是应用最广泛的数值建模技术。然而,在使用有限差分法模拟地震波传播时,较大的空间或时间采样间隔可能会导致频散误差和数值不稳定性。在 FD 方案中,决定频散误差和稳定性的关键因素是 FD 权重的选择。因此,如何获得合适的 FD 权重,以保证数值建模过程稳定且离散误差最小至关重要。根据计算思想的不同,FD 权重计算策略可分为三类:窗函数策略、优化策略和泰勒展开策略。本文通过介绍这三种策略的基本理论,对其进行了全面概述。我们通过各种分析测试和数值建模对它们的优缺点进行了比较分析。根据这些比较,我们提出了该领域的两个潜在研究方向:首先,开发一种能增强稳定性的 FD 权重计算策略;其次,获得既能展现宽带宽又能最大限度减少分散误差的 FD 权重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Overview of computation strategies on the dispersion analysis for explicit finite difference solution of acoustic wave equation

Finite-difference (FD) method is the most extensively employed numerical modeling technique. Nevertheless, when using the FD method to simulate the seismic wave propagation, the large spatial or temporal sampling interval can lead to dispersion errors and numerical instability. In the FD scheme, the key factor in determining both dispersion errors and stability is the selection of the FD weights. Thus, How to obtain appropriate FD weights to guarantee a stable numerical modeling process with minimum dispersion error is critical. The FD weights computation strategies can be classified into three types based on different computational ideologies, window function strategy, optimization strategy, and Taylor expansion strategy. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive overview of these three strategies by presenting their fundamental theories. We conduct a set of comparative analyses of their strengths and weaknesses through various analysis tests and numerical modelings. According to these comparisons, we provide two potential research directions of this field: Firstly, the development of a computational strategy for FD weights that enhances stability; Secondly, obtaining FD weights that exhibit a wide bandwidth while minimizing dispersion errors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Petroleum Science
Petroleum Science 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
16.10%
发文量
311
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Petroleum Science is the only English journal in China on petroleum science and technology that is intended for professionals engaged in petroleum science research and technical applications all over the world, as well as the managerial personnel of oil companies. It covers petroleum geology, petroleum geophysics, petroleum engineering, petrochemistry & chemical engineering, petroleum mechanics, and economic management. It aims to introduce the latest results in oil industry research in China, promote cooperation in petroleum science research between China and the rest of the world, and build a bridge for scientific communication between China and the world.
期刊最新文献
Characterization of chemical composition of high viscosity heavy oils: Macroscopic properties, and semi-quantitative analysis of molecular composition using high-resolution mass spectrometry The impact of industrial transformation on green economic efficiency: New evidence based on energy use Morphological complexity and azimuthal disorder of evolving pore space in low-maturity oil shale during in-situ thermal upgrading and impacts on permeability Influence of the mechanical properties of materials on the ultimate pressure-bearing capability of a pressure-preserving controller 3D rock physics template-based probabilistic estimation of tight sandstone reservoir properties
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1