从视网膜成像中提取的老化生物标志物:范围综述

Michaela Joan Grimbly, Sheri-Michelle Koopowitz, Alice Ruiye Chen, Zihan Sun, Paul J Foster, Mingguang He, Dan J Stein, Jonathan C Ipser, Lisa Zhuoting Zhu
{"title":"从视网膜成像中提取的老化生物标志物:范围综述","authors":"Michaela Joan Grimbly, Sheri-Michelle Koopowitz, Alice Ruiye Chen, Zihan Sun, Paul J Foster, Mingguang He, Dan J Stein, Jonathan C Ipser, Lisa Zhuoting Zhu","doi":"10.1101/2024.02.13.24302673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background/Aims: The emerging concept of retinal age, a biomarker derived from retinal images, holds promise in estimating biological age. The retinal age gap (RAG) represents the difference between retinal age and chronological age which serves as an indicator of deviations from normal ageing. This scoping review aims to collate studies on retinal age to determine its potential clinical utility and to identify knowledge gaps for future research. Methods: Using the PRISMA checklist, eligible non-review, human studies were identified, selected, and appraised. Pubmed, Scopus, SciELO, PsycINFO, Google Scholar, Cochrane, CINAHL, Africa Wide EBSCO, MedRxiv, and BioRxiv databases were searched to identify literature pertaining to retinal age, the RAG, and their associations. No restrictions were imposed on publication date. Results: Thirteen articles published between 2022 and 2023 were analysed, revealing four models capable of determining biological age from retinal images. Three models, Retinal Age, EyeAge and a convolutional network-based model, achieved comparable mean absolute errors (MAE): 3.55, 3.30 and 3.97 respectively. A fourth model, RetiAGE, predicting the probability of being older than 65 years, also demonstrated strong predictive ability with respect to clinical outcomes. In the models identified, a higher predicted RAG demonstrated an association with negative occurrences, notably mortality and cardiovascular health outcomes. Conclusion: This review highlights the potential clinical application of retinal age and RAG, emphasising the need for further research to establish their generalisability for clinical use, particularly in neuropsychiatry. The identified models showcase promising accuracy in estimating biological age, suggesting its viability for evaluating health status.","PeriodicalId":501390,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ageing Biomarkers Derived From Retinal Imaging: A Scoping Review\",\"authors\":\"Michaela Joan Grimbly, Sheri-Michelle Koopowitz, Alice Ruiye Chen, Zihan Sun, Paul J Foster, Mingguang He, Dan J Stein, Jonathan C Ipser, Lisa Zhuoting Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.02.13.24302673\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background/Aims: The emerging concept of retinal age, a biomarker derived from retinal images, holds promise in estimating biological age. The retinal age gap (RAG) represents the difference between retinal age and chronological age which serves as an indicator of deviations from normal ageing. This scoping review aims to collate studies on retinal age to determine its potential clinical utility and to identify knowledge gaps for future research. Methods: Using the PRISMA checklist, eligible non-review, human studies were identified, selected, and appraised. Pubmed, Scopus, SciELO, PsycINFO, Google Scholar, Cochrane, CINAHL, Africa Wide EBSCO, MedRxiv, and BioRxiv databases were searched to identify literature pertaining to retinal age, the RAG, and their associations. No restrictions were imposed on publication date. Results: Thirteen articles published between 2022 and 2023 were analysed, revealing four models capable of determining biological age from retinal images. Three models, Retinal Age, EyeAge and a convolutional network-based model, achieved comparable mean absolute errors (MAE): 3.55, 3.30 and 3.97 respectively. A fourth model, RetiAGE, predicting the probability of being older than 65 years, also demonstrated strong predictive ability with respect to clinical outcomes. In the models identified, a higher predicted RAG demonstrated an association with negative occurrences, notably mortality and cardiovascular health outcomes. Conclusion: This review highlights the potential clinical application of retinal age and RAG, emphasising the need for further research to establish their generalisability for clinical use, particularly in neuropsychiatry. The identified models showcase promising accuracy in estimating biological age, suggesting its viability for evaluating health status.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.13.24302673\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.13.24302673","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:视网膜年龄是一种从视网膜图像中提取的生物标志物,这一新兴概念为估算生物年龄带来了希望。视网膜年龄差距(RAG)代表视网膜年龄与实际年龄之间的差异,可作为偏离正常年龄的指标。本范围综述旨在整理有关视网膜年龄的研究,以确定其潜在的临床用途,并找出未来研究的知识差距。方法:采用 PRISMA 检查表,对符合条件的非综述性人类研究进行鉴定、筛选和评估。检索了 Pubmed、Scopus、SciELO、PsycINFO、Google Scholar、Cochrane、CINAHL、Africa Wide EBSCO、MedRxiv 和 BioRxiv 数据库,以确定与视网膜年龄、RAG 及其关联相关的文献。对发表日期未作限制。结果:分析了 2022 年至 2023 年间发表的 13 篇文章,发现有四种模型能够通过视网膜图像确定生物年龄。视网膜年龄、EyeAge 和基于卷积网络的模型这三种模型的平均绝对误差(MAE)相当:分别为 3.55、3.30 和 3.97。第四个模型 RetiAGE 预测年龄超过 65 岁的概率,也对临床结果表现出很强的预测能力。在已确定的模型中,预测的 RAG 越高,表明与负面结果的发生有关,尤其是死亡率和心血管健康结果。结论本综述强调了视网膜年龄和 RAG 的潜在临床应用,强调需要进一步研究以确定其临床应用的通用性,尤其是在神经精神病学方面。已确定的模型在估算生物年龄方面显示出良好的准确性,表明其在评估健康状况方面的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ageing Biomarkers Derived From Retinal Imaging: A Scoping Review
Background/Aims: The emerging concept of retinal age, a biomarker derived from retinal images, holds promise in estimating biological age. The retinal age gap (RAG) represents the difference between retinal age and chronological age which serves as an indicator of deviations from normal ageing. This scoping review aims to collate studies on retinal age to determine its potential clinical utility and to identify knowledge gaps for future research. Methods: Using the PRISMA checklist, eligible non-review, human studies were identified, selected, and appraised. Pubmed, Scopus, SciELO, PsycINFO, Google Scholar, Cochrane, CINAHL, Africa Wide EBSCO, MedRxiv, and BioRxiv databases were searched to identify literature pertaining to retinal age, the RAG, and their associations. No restrictions were imposed on publication date. Results: Thirteen articles published between 2022 and 2023 were analysed, revealing four models capable of determining biological age from retinal images. Three models, Retinal Age, EyeAge and a convolutional network-based model, achieved comparable mean absolute errors (MAE): 3.55, 3.30 and 3.97 respectively. A fourth model, RetiAGE, predicting the probability of being older than 65 years, also demonstrated strong predictive ability with respect to clinical outcomes. In the models identified, a higher predicted RAG demonstrated an association with negative occurrences, notably mortality and cardiovascular health outcomes. Conclusion: This review highlights the potential clinical application of retinal age and RAG, emphasising the need for further research to establish their generalisability for clinical use, particularly in neuropsychiatry. The identified models showcase promising accuracy in estimating biological age, suggesting its viability for evaluating health status.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prediction of the ectasia screening index from raw Casia2 volume data for keratoconus identification by using convolutional neural networks Utilizing AI-Generated Plain Language Summaries to Enhance Interdisciplinary Understanding of Ophthalmology Notes: A Randomized Trial Deep Learning-Based Detection of Reticular Pseudodrusen in Age-Related Macular Degeneration on Optical Coherence Tomography Photoreceptor outer segment reflectivity with ultrahigh resolution visible light optical coherence tomography in systemic hydroxychloroquine use Comparison of visual function analysis of people with low vision using three different models of augmented reality devices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1