利用地理信息系统技术和遥感数据,整合多标准决策分析和统计模型,绘制阿尔及尔省(阿尔及利亚)西部滑坡易发区地图

IF 2.3 Q2 REMOTE SENSING Applied Geomatics Pub Date : 2024-02-15 DOI:10.1007/s12518-024-00548-9
Safia Mokadem, Ghani Cheikh Lounis, Djamel Machane, Abdeldjalil Goumrasa
{"title":"利用地理信息系统技术和遥感数据,整合多标准决策分析和统计模型,绘制阿尔及尔省(阿尔及利亚)西部滑坡易发区地图","authors":"Safia Mokadem,&nbsp;Ghani Cheikh Lounis,&nbsp;Djamel Machane,&nbsp;Abdeldjalil Goumrasa","doi":"10.1007/s12518-024-00548-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Landslide susceptibility assessment and prediction are among the main processing for disaster management and land use planning activities. Therefore, the general purpose of this research was to evaluate GIS-based spatial modeling of landslides in the western Algiers Province using five models, namely, frequency ratio (FR), weights of evidence (WoE), evidential belief function (EBF), logistic regression (LR), and analytical hierarchy process (AHP), and then compare their performances. At first, a landslide inventory map was prepared according to Google Earth satellite images, historical records, and extensive field surveys. The recorded landslides were divided into two groups (70% and 30%) to establish the training and validation models. In the next step, GIS techniques and remote sensing data were used, to prepare a spatial database containing 13 landslide conditioning factors: lithology, distance to lithological boundaries, permeability, slope, exposure, altitude, profile curvature, plan curvature, precipitation, distance to rivers, topographic wetness index, normalized difference vegetation index, and distance to roads. Finally, the landslide susceptibility maps were produced using the five models and validated by the areas under the relative operative characteristic curve (AUC). The AUC results showed a significant improvement in susceptibility map accuracy; the FR model has the best performance in the training and prediction process (90%), followed by LR (88%, 89%), WoE (88%, 87%), EBF (86%,86%), and AHP (76%,75%), respectively. The produced maps in the current study could be useful for land use planning and hazard mitigation purposes in western Algiers Province.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46286,"journal":{"name":"Applied Geomatics","volume":"16 1","pages":"235 - 280"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integration of multi-criteria decision analysis and statistical models for landslide susceptibility mapping in the western Algiers Province (Algeria) using GIS techniques and remote sensing data\",\"authors\":\"Safia Mokadem,&nbsp;Ghani Cheikh Lounis,&nbsp;Djamel Machane,&nbsp;Abdeldjalil Goumrasa\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12518-024-00548-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Landslide susceptibility assessment and prediction are among the main processing for disaster management and land use planning activities. Therefore, the general purpose of this research was to evaluate GIS-based spatial modeling of landslides in the western Algiers Province using five models, namely, frequency ratio (FR), weights of evidence (WoE), evidential belief function (EBF), logistic regression (LR), and analytical hierarchy process (AHP), and then compare their performances. At first, a landslide inventory map was prepared according to Google Earth satellite images, historical records, and extensive field surveys. The recorded landslides were divided into two groups (70% and 30%) to establish the training and validation models. In the next step, GIS techniques and remote sensing data were used, to prepare a spatial database containing 13 landslide conditioning factors: lithology, distance to lithological boundaries, permeability, slope, exposure, altitude, profile curvature, plan curvature, precipitation, distance to rivers, topographic wetness index, normalized difference vegetation index, and distance to roads. Finally, the landslide susceptibility maps were produced using the five models and validated by the areas under the relative operative characteristic curve (AUC). The AUC results showed a significant improvement in susceptibility map accuracy; the FR model has the best performance in the training and prediction process (90%), followed by LR (88%, 89%), WoE (88%, 87%), EBF (86%,86%), and AHP (76%,75%), respectively. The produced maps in the current study could be useful for land use planning and hazard mitigation purposes in western Algiers Province.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Geomatics\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"235 - 280\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Geomatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12518-024-00548-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REMOTE SENSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Geomatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12518-024-00548-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REMOTE SENSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

滑坡易发性评估和预测是灾害管理和土地利用规划活动的主要处理方式之一。因此,本研究的总体目标是使用频率比(FR)、证据权重(WoE)、证据信念函数(EBF)、逻辑回归(LR)和分析层次过程(AHP)这五种模型对阿尔及尔省西部基于地理信息系统的滑坡空间建模进行评估,然后比较它们的性能。首先,根据谷歌地球卫星图像、历史记录和广泛的实地调查绘制了滑坡目录图。记录的滑坡分为两组(70% 和 30%),以建立训练模型和验证模型。下一步,利用地理信息系统技术和遥感数据,编制了包含 13 个滑坡条件因子的空间数据库:岩性、岩性边界距离、渗透性、坡度、暴露程度、海拔高度、剖面曲率、平面曲率、降水量、河流距离、地形湿润指数、归一化差异植被指数和道路距离。最后,利用这五种模型绘制了滑坡易发性图,并通过相对作用特征曲线下面积(AUC)进行了验证。AUC 结果显示,易损性地图的准确性有了显著提高;FR 模型在训练和预测过程中表现最佳(90%),其次分别是 LR(88%,89%)、WoE(88%,87%)、EBF(86%,86%)和 AHP(76%,75%)。本次研究绘制的地图可用于阿尔及尔省西部的土地利用规划和减灾目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Integration of multi-criteria decision analysis and statistical models for landslide susceptibility mapping in the western Algiers Province (Algeria) using GIS techniques and remote sensing data

Landslide susceptibility assessment and prediction are among the main processing for disaster management and land use planning activities. Therefore, the general purpose of this research was to evaluate GIS-based spatial modeling of landslides in the western Algiers Province using five models, namely, frequency ratio (FR), weights of evidence (WoE), evidential belief function (EBF), logistic regression (LR), and analytical hierarchy process (AHP), and then compare their performances. At first, a landslide inventory map was prepared according to Google Earth satellite images, historical records, and extensive field surveys. The recorded landslides were divided into two groups (70% and 30%) to establish the training and validation models. In the next step, GIS techniques and remote sensing data were used, to prepare a spatial database containing 13 landslide conditioning factors: lithology, distance to lithological boundaries, permeability, slope, exposure, altitude, profile curvature, plan curvature, precipitation, distance to rivers, topographic wetness index, normalized difference vegetation index, and distance to roads. Finally, the landslide susceptibility maps were produced using the five models and validated by the areas under the relative operative characteristic curve (AUC). The AUC results showed a significant improvement in susceptibility map accuracy; the FR model has the best performance in the training and prediction process (90%), followed by LR (88%, 89%), WoE (88%, 87%), EBF (86%,86%), and AHP (76%,75%), respectively. The produced maps in the current study could be useful for land use planning and hazard mitigation purposes in western Algiers Province.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Geomatics
Applied Geomatics REMOTE SENSING-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Applied Geomatics (AGMJ) is the official journal of SIFET the Italian Society of Photogrammetry and Topography and covers all aspects and information on scientific and technical advances in the geomatics sciences. The Journal publishes innovative contributions in geomatics applications ranging from the integration of instruments, methodologies and technologies and their use in the environmental sciences, engineering and other natural sciences. The areas of interest include many research fields such as: remote sensing, close range and videometric photogrammetry, image analysis, digital mapping, land and geographic information systems, geographic information science, integrated geodesy, spatial data analysis, heritage recording; network adjustment and numerical processes. Furthermore, Applied Geomatics is open to articles from all areas of deformation measurements and analysis, structural engineering, mechanical engineering and all trends in earth and planetary survey science and space technology. The Journal also contains notices of conferences and international workshops, industry news, and information on new products. It provides a useful forum for professional and academic scientists involved in geomatics science and technology. Information on Open Research Funding and Support may be found here: https://www.springernature.com/gp/open-research/institutional-agreements
期刊最新文献
Interphase modeling of sedimentation rate using the GIS-based modified universal soil loss equation Circle-circle intersection. A universal method for solving typical surveying problems Drainage analysis of the Karanja River basin, Karnataka, India using Geo-informatics Predicting the spatiotemporal changes of an agriculturally vulnerable region of Bangladesh A new fuzzy location-based approach for fire station site selection in Tehran
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1