大剂量维生素 D 对重症监护病房 COVID-19 患者死亡率和住院时间的影响:随机临床试验

MohammadHosein Zamanian, Zohreh Javadfar, Yahay Salimi, Mer Ali Rahimi, Elham Rabieenia, Akram Rahimi
{"title":"大剂量维生素 D 对重症监护病房 COVID-19 患者死亡率和住院时间的影响:随机临床试验","authors":"MohammadHosein Zamanian, Zohreh Javadfar, Yahay Salimi, Mer Ali Rahimi, Elham Rabieenia, Akram Rahimi","doi":"10.5812/jkums-140510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Evidence indicating the effect of vitamin D supplementation on improving the clinical outcomes of COVID-19 is limited. Objectives: This study aimed to examine the effect of high-dose vitamin D on mortality and hospital length of stay in ICU patients with COVID-19. Methods: A single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial study was conducted on 61 patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 hospitalized in the ICU of Golestan Hospital, Kermanshah, Iran. Participants were randomly divided to receive a single dose of 300 000 IU vitamin D3 intramuscularly (n = 31) or placebo (n = 30). The primary outcomes were the length of hospital stay and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were the length of stay in the ICU, the number of patients requiring mechanical ventilation, and the serum level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D. Results: Out of 61 randomized patients, 44 patients with a mean age of 53.49 ± 13.2 years, body mass index of 29.80 ± 5.0 kg/m2, and serum vitamin D level of 24.36 ± 4.47 mg/dL were included in the study for primary analysis, of whom 31 (70.5%) cases were men. Median (interquartile range), the length of hospital stay between the vitamin D group (5.0 [6.0 - 11.0] days), placebo group (11.0 [6.0 - 17.0] days) (log-rank P = 0.23; unadjusted hazard ratio [HR] for hospital discharge, 3.4 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4 - 28.05]; P = 0.25; adjusted HR, 0.04 [95%CI, 11.52 - 0.0001]; P = 0.27) and mortality (unadjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.63 [95% CI,0.09 - 4.21]; P = 0.63; adjusted OR, 0.46 [95%CI, 0.03 - 6.55]; P = 0.57) showed no significant difference between the two groups before and after the adjustment of confounding factors. No significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding the need for mechanical ventilation (unadjusted OR for intubation = 2.1 [95% CI, 0.17 - 25.01]; P = 0.55), adjusted OR = 1.16 [95%CI, 0.04 - 27.57]; P = 0.92), and the length of stay in ICUs (log-rank = 2.49, P = 0.114; unadjusted HR for ICU discharge, 6.28 [95%CI, 0.5 - 78.42]; P = 0.15; adjusted HR = 21.48 [95%CI, 0.12 - 3677.48]; P = 0.24). Conclusions: Based on the results, A high dose of vitamin D did not significantly reduce mortality and hospital length of stay in ICU patients with COVID-19.","PeriodicalId":507382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences","volume":"19 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of High-Dose Vitamin D on Mortality and Hospital Length of Stay in ICU Patients with COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial\",\"authors\":\"MohammadHosein Zamanian, Zohreh Javadfar, Yahay Salimi, Mer Ali Rahimi, Elham Rabieenia, Akram Rahimi\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/jkums-140510\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Evidence indicating the effect of vitamin D supplementation on improving the clinical outcomes of COVID-19 is limited. Objectives: This study aimed to examine the effect of high-dose vitamin D on mortality and hospital length of stay in ICU patients with COVID-19. Methods: A single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial study was conducted on 61 patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 hospitalized in the ICU of Golestan Hospital, Kermanshah, Iran. Participants were randomly divided to receive a single dose of 300 000 IU vitamin D3 intramuscularly (n = 31) or placebo (n = 30). The primary outcomes were the length of hospital stay and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were the length of stay in the ICU, the number of patients requiring mechanical ventilation, and the serum level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D. Results: Out of 61 randomized patients, 44 patients with a mean age of 53.49 ± 13.2 years, body mass index of 29.80 ± 5.0 kg/m2, and serum vitamin D level of 24.36 ± 4.47 mg/dL were included in the study for primary analysis, of whom 31 (70.5%) cases were men. Median (interquartile range), the length of hospital stay between the vitamin D group (5.0 [6.0 - 11.0] days), placebo group (11.0 [6.0 - 17.0] days) (log-rank P = 0.23; unadjusted hazard ratio [HR] for hospital discharge, 3.4 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4 - 28.05]; P = 0.25; adjusted HR, 0.04 [95%CI, 11.52 - 0.0001]; P = 0.27) and mortality (unadjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.63 [95% CI,0.09 - 4.21]; P = 0.63; adjusted OR, 0.46 [95%CI, 0.03 - 6.55]; P = 0.57) showed no significant difference between the two groups before and after the adjustment of confounding factors. No significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding the need for mechanical ventilation (unadjusted OR for intubation = 2.1 [95% CI, 0.17 - 25.01]; P = 0.55), adjusted OR = 1.16 [95%CI, 0.04 - 27.57]; P = 0.92), and the length of stay in ICUs (log-rank = 2.49, P = 0.114; unadjusted HR for ICU discharge, 6.28 [95%CI, 0.5 - 78.42]; P = 0.15; adjusted HR = 21.48 [95%CI, 0.12 - 3677.48]; P = 0.24). Conclusions: Based on the results, A high dose of vitamin D did not significantly reduce mortality and hospital length of stay in ICU patients with COVID-19.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"19 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/jkums-140510\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/jkums-140510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:有关补充维生素 D 对改善 COVID-19 临床疗效的证据有限。研究目的本研究旨在探讨大剂量维生素 D 对 COVID-19 ICU 患者死亡率和住院时间的影响。研究方法在伊朗克尔曼沙阿市戈勒斯坦医院重症监护室住院的 61 名中重度 COVID-19 患者中开展了一项单中心、双盲、安慰剂对照、随机临床试验研究。参与者被随机分为肌肉注射单剂量 300 000 IU 维生素 D3(31 人)或安慰剂(30 人)。主要结果是住院时间和院内死亡率。次要结果是重症监护室的住院时间、需要机械通气的患者人数以及血清中 25- 羟维生素 D 的水平:在 61 名随机患者中,44 名患者的平均年龄为(53.49 ± 13.2)岁,体重指数为(29.80 ± 5.0)kg/m2,血清维生素 D 水平为(24.36 ± 4.47)mg/dL,其中 31 例(70.5%)为男性。维生素 D 组(5.0 [6.0 - 11.0] 天)、安慰剂组(11.0 [6.0 - 17.0] 天)的住院时间中位数(四分位数间距)(对数秩 P = 0.23;未调整出院危险比 [HR],3.4 [95% 置信区间 [CI],0.4 - 28.05];P = 0.25;调整后 HR,0.04 [95%CI,11.52 - 0.0001];P = 0.27)和死亡率(未调整的几率比[OR],0.63 [95% CI,0.09 - 4.21];P = 0.63;调整后的 OR,0.46 [95%CI,0.03 - 6.55];P = 0.57)显示两组在调整混杂因素前后无显著差异。两组在机械通气需求方面无明显差异(未调整插管 OR = 2.1 [95%CI, 0.17 - 25.01]; P = 0.55),调整后 OR = 1.16 [95%CI, 0.04 - 27.57]; P = 0.92),以及在 ICU 的住院时间(对数秩 = 2.49,P = 0.114;ICU 出院的未调整 HR,6.28 [95%CI, 0.5 - 78.42]; P = 0.15;调整 HR = 21.48 [95%CI, 0.12 - 3677.48]; P = 0.24)。结论根据研究结果,大剂量维生素 D 并不能显著降低 COVID-19 ICU 患者的死亡率和住院时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of High-Dose Vitamin D on Mortality and Hospital Length of Stay in ICU Patients with COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Background: Evidence indicating the effect of vitamin D supplementation on improving the clinical outcomes of COVID-19 is limited. Objectives: This study aimed to examine the effect of high-dose vitamin D on mortality and hospital length of stay in ICU patients with COVID-19. Methods: A single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial study was conducted on 61 patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 hospitalized in the ICU of Golestan Hospital, Kermanshah, Iran. Participants were randomly divided to receive a single dose of 300 000 IU vitamin D3 intramuscularly (n = 31) or placebo (n = 30). The primary outcomes were the length of hospital stay and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were the length of stay in the ICU, the number of patients requiring mechanical ventilation, and the serum level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D. Results: Out of 61 randomized patients, 44 patients with a mean age of 53.49 ± 13.2 years, body mass index of 29.80 ± 5.0 kg/m2, and serum vitamin D level of 24.36 ± 4.47 mg/dL were included in the study for primary analysis, of whom 31 (70.5%) cases were men. Median (interquartile range), the length of hospital stay between the vitamin D group (5.0 [6.0 - 11.0] days), placebo group (11.0 [6.0 - 17.0] days) (log-rank P = 0.23; unadjusted hazard ratio [HR] for hospital discharge, 3.4 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4 - 28.05]; P = 0.25; adjusted HR, 0.04 [95%CI, 11.52 - 0.0001]; P = 0.27) and mortality (unadjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.63 [95% CI,0.09 - 4.21]; P = 0.63; adjusted OR, 0.46 [95%CI, 0.03 - 6.55]; P = 0.57) showed no significant difference between the two groups before and after the adjustment of confounding factors. No significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding the need for mechanical ventilation (unadjusted OR for intubation = 2.1 [95% CI, 0.17 - 25.01]; P = 0.55), adjusted OR = 1.16 [95%CI, 0.04 - 27.57]; P = 0.92), and the length of stay in ICUs (log-rank = 2.49, P = 0.114; unadjusted HR for ICU discharge, 6.28 [95%CI, 0.5 - 78.42]; P = 0.15; adjusted HR = 21.48 [95%CI, 0.12 - 3677.48]; P = 0.24). Conclusions: Based on the results, A high dose of vitamin D did not significantly reduce mortality and hospital length of stay in ICU patients with COVID-19.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Gene Variants of Vitamin D Receptor (TaqI T > C (rs731236) and BsmI G > A (rs1544410) in Urolithiasis Prevalence of Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Bacterial Isolates in Iran: A Systematic Review Assessment of Occupational Hazards and Health Status Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern of Nosocomial and Community-Acquired Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Isfahan: A Prospective Multicenter Study Factors Affecting Sleep Problems Among Young People During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Report from Western Iran
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1