电影政策中的文化多样性和包容性论述:佛兰德斯案例(2002-2022 年)

Alexander De Man, Gertjan Willems, Daniel Biltereyst
{"title":"电影政策中的文化多样性和包容性论述:佛兰德斯案例(2002-2022 年)","authors":"Alexander De Man, Gertjan Willems, Daniel Biltereyst","doi":"10.1177/13675494241228937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines how Flemish film policy actors and industry stakeholders have conceptualized, framed and operationalized cultural diversity and inclusion over the past two decades (2002–2022). Drawing on critical discourse and interpretive policy analysis of policy documents and a series of in-depth expert interviews, we investigate how discourses of diversity in cultural policymaking are consistently shaped by (neo-)liberal continuations of deregulation, state neutrality and marketization. This article identifies three discursive shifts over the years, highlighting their complex tensions with the persistent, liberal-egalitarian principle of difference-blind universalism. Framing these tensions as a major obstacle in achieving a paradigmatic policy shift toward the inclusion of ethnic/diasporic minorities in Flemish cinema, we advance a more comprehensive way of understanding why media diversity policies have, so far, proven inadequate.","PeriodicalId":502446,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cultural Studies","volume":"30 33","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discourses of cultural diversity and inclusion in film policy: The case of Flanders (2002–2022)\",\"authors\":\"Alexander De Man, Gertjan Willems, Daniel Biltereyst\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13675494241228937\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines how Flemish film policy actors and industry stakeholders have conceptualized, framed and operationalized cultural diversity and inclusion over the past two decades (2002–2022). Drawing on critical discourse and interpretive policy analysis of policy documents and a series of in-depth expert interviews, we investigate how discourses of diversity in cultural policymaking are consistently shaped by (neo-)liberal continuations of deregulation, state neutrality and marketization. This article identifies three discursive shifts over the years, highlighting their complex tensions with the persistent, liberal-egalitarian principle of difference-blind universalism. Framing these tensions as a major obstacle in achieving a paradigmatic policy shift toward the inclusion of ethnic/diasporic minorities in Flemish cinema, we advance a more comprehensive way of understanding why media diversity policies have, so far, proven inadequate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":502446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Cultural Studies\",\"volume\":\"30 33\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Cultural Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13675494241228937\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13675494241228937","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了弗拉芒电影政策参与者和产业利益相关者在过去二十年(2002-2022 年)中是如何将文化多样性和包容性概念化、框架化和操作化的。通过对政策文件的批判性话语和解释性政策分析以及一系列深入的专家访谈,我们研究了文化政策制定中的多样性话语是如何被放松管制、国家中立和市场化的(新)自由主义延续所塑造的。本文指出了多年来的三种话语转变,强调了它们与自由主义--平等主义的 "差异-盲目-普遍 "原则之间的复杂矛盾。我们将这些紧张关系视为实现政策范式转变的主要障碍,以实现佛兰德斯电影对少数民族/散居少数民族的包容,从而以一种更全面的方式来理解为什么媒体多样性政策迄今为止仍被证明是不够的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Discourses of cultural diversity and inclusion in film policy: The case of Flanders (2002–2022)
This article examines how Flemish film policy actors and industry stakeholders have conceptualized, framed and operationalized cultural diversity and inclusion over the past two decades (2002–2022). Drawing on critical discourse and interpretive policy analysis of policy documents and a series of in-depth expert interviews, we investigate how discourses of diversity in cultural policymaking are consistently shaped by (neo-)liberal continuations of deregulation, state neutrality and marketization. This article identifies three discursive shifts over the years, highlighting their complex tensions with the persistent, liberal-egalitarian principle of difference-blind universalism. Framing these tensions as a major obstacle in achieving a paradigmatic policy shift toward the inclusion of ethnic/diasporic minorities in Flemish cinema, we advance a more comprehensive way of understanding why media diversity policies have, so far, proven inadequate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The transgender space invader: Out of time and out of affect Representation of climate change and global warming in comics: From apocalyptic fiction to educational tool Challengers: A cultural studies commentary on the fire and ice of filmic desires ‘I think it takes balls, girl balls, to challenge those stereotypes’: Women’s perceptions of board game culture ‘The small girl with the huge dildo is what we needed’: The politics of sex toy in Cocks Not Glocks protest
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1