激进投资者如何评估目标公司:对冲基金报告的证据

IF 0.9 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance Pub Date : 2024-02-09 DOI:10.1002/jcaf.22689
Maximilian Pfirrmann, Korbinian Eichner
{"title":"激进投资者如何评估目标公司:对冲基金报告的证据","authors":"Maximilian Pfirrmann,&nbsp;Korbinian Eichner","doi":"10.1002/jcaf.22689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This research study provides insights on how activist hedge funds perform valuation analyses of target firms. Relevant data was hand-collected from a sample of activist hedge fund presentations. Based on the hedge funds’ valuation analyses, the undervaluation of the target firms amounts to approximately 30%, compared to the targets’ current share price. Besides, activist investors derive a value enhancement potential from their proposed strategies of approximately 70% to the targets’ current share price. These valuation results rely predominately on trading multiples. The dominant multiples are Enterprise value/EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) and Price/Earnings (P/E). Further, applied multiples are mainly forward-looking, and the predicted performance measures are primarily consensus estimates. Besides, hedge funds sometimes adjust multiples arbitrarily to increase the comparability. Our results confirm that short-term investors rely predominately on pricing analyses in their valuations.</p>","PeriodicalId":44561,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcaf.22689","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How activist investors value target firms: Evidence from hedge fund presentations\",\"authors\":\"Maximilian Pfirrmann,&nbsp;Korbinian Eichner\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jcaf.22689\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This research study provides insights on how activist hedge funds perform valuation analyses of target firms. Relevant data was hand-collected from a sample of activist hedge fund presentations. Based on the hedge funds’ valuation analyses, the undervaluation of the target firms amounts to approximately 30%, compared to the targets’ current share price. Besides, activist investors derive a value enhancement potential from their proposed strategies of approximately 70% to the targets’ current share price. These valuation results rely predominately on trading multiples. The dominant multiples are Enterprise value/EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) and Price/Earnings (P/E). Further, applied multiples are mainly forward-looking, and the predicted performance measures are primarily consensus estimates. Besides, hedge funds sometimes adjust multiples arbitrarily to increase the comparability. Our results confirm that short-term investors rely predominately on pricing analyses in their valuations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44561,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcaf.22689\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcaf.22689\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcaf.22689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究就激进对冲基金如何对目标公司进行估值分析提供了见解。相关数据是从激进对冲基金的演示样本中手工收集的。根据对冲基金的估值分析,与目标公司目前的股价相比,目标公司的估值被低估了约 30%。此外,激进投资者从其提出的战略中获得的价值提升潜力约为目标公司当前股价的 70%。这些估值结果主要依赖于交易倍数。最主要的倍数是企业价值/EBITDA(EV/EBITDA)和市盈率(P/E)。此外,应用的乘数主要是前瞻性的,预测的业绩指标主要是共识估计值。此外,对冲基金有时会任意调整倍数,以增加可比性。我们的研究结果证实,短期投资者在估值时主要依赖定价分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How activist investors value target firms: Evidence from hedge fund presentations

This research study provides insights on how activist hedge funds perform valuation analyses of target firms. Relevant data was hand-collected from a sample of activist hedge fund presentations. Based on the hedge funds’ valuation analyses, the undervaluation of the target firms amounts to approximately 30%, compared to the targets’ current share price. Besides, activist investors derive a value enhancement potential from their proposed strategies of approximately 70% to the targets’ current share price. These valuation results rely predominately on trading multiples. The dominant multiples are Enterprise value/EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) and Price/Earnings (P/E). Further, applied multiples are mainly forward-looking, and the predicted performance measures are primarily consensus estimates. Besides, hedge funds sometimes adjust multiples arbitrarily to increase the comparability. Our results confirm that short-term investors rely predominately on pricing analyses in their valuations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
69
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Does corporate governance affect investment efficiency of Indian firms? Panel evidence from new governance indices Issue Information Retraction: International expansion and audit opinion shopping: A signaling perspective Costs and benefits of the LIFO-FIFO choice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1