与助听器纵向使用模式相关的因素

Grace Gahlon, Emmanuel E. Garcia Morales, Lama Assi, Nicholas S Reed
{"title":"与助听器纵向使用模式相关的因素","authors":"Grace Gahlon, Emmanuel E. Garcia Morales, Lama Assi, Nicholas S Reed","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igae011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n The objectives of this study are to identify patterns of hearing aid usage among U.S. National Health & Aging Trends Study (NHATS) participants and to examine users’ characteristics associated with each pattern.\n \n \n \n Using data from 666 adults ages 65 and above from NHATS, we analyzed individuals’ self-reported hearing aid use from eight waves of data, 2011 to 2018, using group-based trajectory modelling to identify clusters of individuals with similar utilization patterns of use over time. Potential risk factors associated with membership to a specific group included baseline sociodemographic characteristics, problems with activities of daily living (ADLs), presence of a caregiver, and experiencing problems with their hearing aid. We compute and analyze the odds ratios between individuals’ baseline characteristics and group membership.\n \n \n \n We identified three utilization group patterns: continued use (n = 510, 76.6%), interrupted use (n = 121, 18.2%), and ceased use (n = 35, 5.2%). Individuals with an income under the poverty line had 2.9 (95% CI: [1.09, 7.75]) and 2.7 times (95% CI: [1.38, 5.27]) the odds of being in the interrupted and ceased use group, respectively, compared to the continued use group. Other risk factors for interrupted and ceased use included lower education and having a caregiver.\n \n \n \n Nearly a quarter of hearing aid users experience interrupted or ceased use of hearing aids. Socioeconomic factors, such as age, income, and education, may be relevant for how individuals use assistive medical devices over time and could inform policymakers to support maintained use of hearing aids.\n","PeriodicalId":507173,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":" 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors associated with longitudinal patterns of hearing aid use\",\"authors\":\"Grace Gahlon, Emmanuel E. Garcia Morales, Lama Assi, Nicholas S Reed\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/geroni/igae011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n The objectives of this study are to identify patterns of hearing aid usage among U.S. National Health & Aging Trends Study (NHATS) participants and to examine users’ characteristics associated with each pattern.\\n \\n \\n \\n Using data from 666 adults ages 65 and above from NHATS, we analyzed individuals’ self-reported hearing aid use from eight waves of data, 2011 to 2018, using group-based trajectory modelling to identify clusters of individuals with similar utilization patterns of use over time. Potential risk factors associated with membership to a specific group included baseline sociodemographic characteristics, problems with activities of daily living (ADLs), presence of a caregiver, and experiencing problems with their hearing aid. We compute and analyze the odds ratios between individuals’ baseline characteristics and group membership.\\n \\n \\n \\n We identified three utilization group patterns: continued use (n = 510, 76.6%), interrupted use (n = 121, 18.2%), and ceased use (n = 35, 5.2%). Individuals with an income under the poverty line had 2.9 (95% CI: [1.09, 7.75]) and 2.7 times (95% CI: [1.38, 5.27]) the odds of being in the interrupted and ceased use group, respectively, compared to the continued use group. Other risk factors for interrupted and ceased use included lower education and having a caregiver.\\n \\n \\n \\n Nearly a quarter of hearing aid users experience interrupted or ceased use of hearing aids. Socioeconomic factors, such as age, income, and education, may be relevant for how individuals use assistive medical devices over time and could inform policymakers to support maintained use of hearing aids.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":507173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovation in Aging\",\"volume\":\" 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovation in Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在确定美国国家健康与老龄化趋势研究(NHATS)参与者使用助听器的模式,并研究与每种模式相关的用户特征。 利用来自 NHATS 的 666 名 65 岁及以上成年人的数据,我们分析了 2011 年至 2018 年八次波次数据中个人自我报告的助听器使用情况,并使用基于群体的轨迹建模来识别随着时间推移具有相似使用模式的个人集群。与特定群体成员相关的潜在风险因素包括基线社会人口学特征、日常生活活动(ADLs)问题、是否有照顾者以及助听器是否出现问题。我们计算并分析了个人基线特征与群体成员资格之间的几率比。 我们确定了三种使用群体模式:持续使用(510 人,占 76.6%)、中断使用(121 人,占 18.2%)和停止使用(35 人,占 5.2%)。与继续使用组相比,收入低于贫困线的个人成为中断和停止使用组的几率分别是后者的 2.9 倍(95% CI:[1.09, 7.75])和 2.7 倍(95% CI:[1.38, 5.27])。中断和停止使用助听器的其他风险因素包括教育程度较低和有照顾者。 近四分之一的助听器使用者曾中断或停止使用助听器。年龄、收入和教育程度等社会经济因素可能与个人如何长期使用辅助医疗设备有关,可为政策制定者提供信息,以支持人们继续使用助听器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Factors associated with longitudinal patterns of hearing aid use
The objectives of this study are to identify patterns of hearing aid usage among U.S. National Health & Aging Trends Study (NHATS) participants and to examine users’ characteristics associated with each pattern. Using data from 666 adults ages 65 and above from NHATS, we analyzed individuals’ self-reported hearing aid use from eight waves of data, 2011 to 2018, using group-based trajectory modelling to identify clusters of individuals with similar utilization patterns of use over time. Potential risk factors associated with membership to a specific group included baseline sociodemographic characteristics, problems with activities of daily living (ADLs), presence of a caregiver, and experiencing problems with their hearing aid. We compute and analyze the odds ratios between individuals’ baseline characteristics and group membership. We identified three utilization group patterns: continued use (n = 510, 76.6%), interrupted use (n = 121, 18.2%), and ceased use (n = 35, 5.2%). Individuals with an income under the poverty line had 2.9 (95% CI: [1.09, 7.75]) and 2.7 times (95% CI: [1.38, 5.27]) the odds of being in the interrupted and ceased use group, respectively, compared to the continued use group. Other risk factors for interrupted and ceased use included lower education and having a caregiver. Nearly a quarter of hearing aid users experience interrupted or ceased use of hearing aids. Socioeconomic factors, such as age, income, and education, may be relevant for how individuals use assistive medical devices over time and could inform policymakers to support maintained use of hearing aids.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Racial/Ethnic Differences in Loneliness among Older Adults: The Role of Income and Education as Mediators Feeling younger on active summer days? On the interplay of behavioral and environmental factors with day-to-day variability in subjective age Mechanical Property, Efficacy, and User Experience of An Innovative Wearable Device in Preventing Fall-Induced Injuries Physical frailty and the risk of degenerative valvular heart disease The Efficacy of a Home-Based Functional Skills Training Program for Older Adults With and Without a Cognitive Impairment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1