九年级德语和英语能力与学业成功之间的纵向联系

Christoph Jindra, Stefan Schipolowski, Karoline A. Sachse, Petra Stanat
{"title":"九年级德语和英语能力与学业成功之间的纵向联系","authors":"Christoph Jindra, Stefan Schipolowski, Karoline A. Sachse, Petra Stanat","doi":"10.1024/1010-0652/a000375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Standards-based monitoring of student achievement assumes that the assessments measure relevant competencies and skills for educational success. Students who reach proficiency levels in the assessments designed to represent the standards should be more successful in their schooling career than students reaching lower proficiency levels. However, empirical evidence for the predictive validity of test results and, specifically, proficiency levels used in educational monitoring is scarce. We report associations between proficiency levels reached in a German large-scale educational monitoring study ( N = 1183, Mage = 15.5 and 49% female) based on National Educational Standards for German and English and two indicators of school success observed afterwards. First, we describe the relation between proficiency levels and the highest achieved degree in secondary education. Second, we describe the relation between proficiency levels and grades in English and German exams, taken at the end of secondary level I as part of the central exit examination (Grade 10). Using ordered logistic regressions, we find a strong relation between proficiency levels measured by the tests and both outcomes. Results indicate, for example, that students who failed the minimum standard for the first secondary school-leaving certificate in German reading have twice the probability of leaving school without a degree compared to students who just passed the minimum standard. Our findings show that proficiencies assessed in the large-scale educational monitoring study have substantial predictive power for students' educational careers.","PeriodicalId":504854,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Longitudinal associations between German and English language competencies in Grade 9 and educational success\",\"authors\":\"Christoph Jindra, Stefan Schipolowski, Karoline A. Sachse, Petra Stanat\",\"doi\":\"10.1024/1010-0652/a000375\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: Standards-based monitoring of student achievement assumes that the assessments measure relevant competencies and skills for educational success. Students who reach proficiency levels in the assessments designed to represent the standards should be more successful in their schooling career than students reaching lower proficiency levels. However, empirical evidence for the predictive validity of test results and, specifically, proficiency levels used in educational monitoring is scarce. We report associations between proficiency levels reached in a German large-scale educational monitoring study ( N = 1183, Mage = 15.5 and 49% female) based on National Educational Standards for German and English and two indicators of school success observed afterwards. First, we describe the relation between proficiency levels and the highest achieved degree in secondary education. Second, we describe the relation between proficiency levels and grades in English and German exams, taken at the end of secondary level I as part of the central exit examination (Grade 10). Using ordered logistic regressions, we find a strong relation between proficiency levels measured by the tests and both outcomes. Results indicate, for example, that students who failed the minimum standard for the first secondary school-leaving certificate in German reading have twice the probability of leaving school without a degree compared to students who just passed the minimum standard. Our findings show that proficiencies assessed in the large-scale educational monitoring study have substantial predictive power for students' educational careers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":504854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652/a000375\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652/a000375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:基于标准的学生成绩监测假定,评估衡量的是教育成功所需的相关能力和技能。在代表标准的评估中达到熟练水平的学生应该比达到较低熟练水平的学生在学习生涯中更成功。然而,有关测试结果,特别是教育监测中使用的能力水平的预测有效性的经验证据却很少。我们报告了一项德国大规模教育监测研究(N = 1183,Mage = 15.5,49% 为女性)中根据《德语和英语国家教育标准》达到的能力水平与之后观察到的两项学校成功指标之间的关系。首先,我们描述了能力水平与中学教育最高学历之间的关系。其次,我们描述了能力水平与英语和德语考试成绩之间的关系,英语和德语考试是在中学一级结束时进行的,也是集中毕业考试(10 年级)的一部分。通过有序逻辑回归,我们发现考试所衡量的能力水平与这两个结果之间存在密切关系。例如,结果表明,与刚刚通过最低标准的学生相比,未达到第一级中学毕业证书德语阅读最低标准的学生离校时未获得学位的概率是后者的两倍。我们的研究结果表明,大规模教育监测研究中评估的能力对学生的教育生涯有很大的预测作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Longitudinal associations between German and English language competencies in Grade 9 and educational success
Abstract: Standards-based monitoring of student achievement assumes that the assessments measure relevant competencies and skills for educational success. Students who reach proficiency levels in the assessments designed to represent the standards should be more successful in their schooling career than students reaching lower proficiency levels. However, empirical evidence for the predictive validity of test results and, specifically, proficiency levels used in educational monitoring is scarce. We report associations between proficiency levels reached in a German large-scale educational monitoring study ( N = 1183, Mage = 15.5 and 49% female) based on National Educational Standards for German and English and two indicators of school success observed afterwards. First, we describe the relation between proficiency levels and the highest achieved degree in secondary education. Second, we describe the relation between proficiency levels and grades in English and German exams, taken at the end of secondary level I as part of the central exit examination (Grade 10). Using ordered logistic regressions, we find a strong relation between proficiency levels measured by the tests and both outcomes. Results indicate, for example, that students who failed the minimum standard for the first secondary school-leaving certificate in German reading have twice the probability of leaving school without a degree compared to students who just passed the minimum standard. Our findings show that proficiencies assessed in the large-scale educational monitoring study have substantial predictive power for students' educational careers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ressourcenorientiert Testen? Effekte des Instruktionsdesigns auf die Testleistung Longitudinal associations between German and English language competencies in Grade 9 and educational success Longitudinal associations between German and English language competencies in Grade 9 and educational success Durch ein Online-Self-Assessment angeregte Selbstreflexion von Lernerfahrungen im Praktikum Durch ein Online-Self-Assessment angeregte Selbstreflexion von Lernerfahrungen im Praktikum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1