伊斯兰教、奴隶制和种族主义:伊斯兰教、奴隶制和种族主义:追求人权的策略运用》(1987 年)* 。

Q3 Arts and Humanities American Journal of Islam and Society Pub Date : 2024-02-05 DOI:10.35632/ajis.v41i1.3423
Fadel Abdallah
{"title":"伊斯兰教、奴隶制和种族主义:伊斯兰教、奴隶制和种族主义:追求人权的策略运用》(1987 年)* 。","authors":"Fadel Abdallah","doi":"10.35632/ajis.v41i1.3423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Slavery is one of the most controversial and arresting topics in humanhistory. The question of Islam in relation to slavery has been an issue ofconcern among scholars for a long time. It became a question in which manyOrientalists found a convenient gap to pass through in their attacks againstthe system of governance and justice in Islam. This self-righteous criticismagainst the attitude of Islam towards slavery is part of a long Western traditionof scholarship based on stereotyping, overstating, and selectivity of Islamin particular and the Orient in general. Most of the time, the statements ofthese scholars are presented in a sugar-coated style of language that is moredangerous than if they were presented in a critical, open, and direct language.Thomas Carlyle, Renan, Goldziher, Macdonald, von Grunebaum, Gibb andBernard Lewis are good examples and representatives of this tradition.\n*This article was first published in the American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences 4, no. 1 (1987): 31-50","PeriodicalId":34866,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Islam and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Islam, Slavery, and Racism: The Use of Strategy in the Pursuit of Human Rights (1987)*\",\"authors\":\"Fadel Abdallah\",\"doi\":\"10.35632/ajis.v41i1.3423\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Slavery is one of the most controversial and arresting topics in humanhistory. The question of Islam in relation to slavery has been an issue ofconcern among scholars for a long time. It became a question in which manyOrientalists found a convenient gap to pass through in their attacks againstthe system of governance and justice in Islam. This self-righteous criticismagainst the attitude of Islam towards slavery is part of a long Western traditionof scholarship based on stereotyping, overstating, and selectivity of Islamin particular and the Orient in general. Most of the time, the statements ofthese scholars are presented in a sugar-coated style of language that is moredangerous than if they were presented in a critical, open, and direct language.Thomas Carlyle, Renan, Goldziher, Macdonald, von Grunebaum, Gibb andBernard Lewis are good examples and representatives of this tradition.\\n*This article was first published in the American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences 4, no. 1 (1987): 31-50\",\"PeriodicalId\":34866,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Islam and Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Islam and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35632/ajis.v41i1.3423\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Islam and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35632/ajis.v41i1.3423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

奴隶制是人类历史上最具争议性和最吸引人的话题之一。伊斯兰教与奴隶制的关系问题长期以来一直是学者们关注的问题。在这个问题上,许多东方学者找到了一个方便的缺口,借以攻击伊斯兰教的管理和正义制度。这种自以为是地批评伊斯兰教对奴隶制的态度,是西方悠久的学术传统的一部分,其基础是对伊斯兰教和整个东方的刻板印象、夸大其词和选择性。Thomas Carlyle、Renan、Goldziher、Macdonald、von Grunebaum、Gibb 和 Bernard Lewis 就是这一传统的典范和代表:31-50
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Islam, Slavery, and Racism: The Use of Strategy in the Pursuit of Human Rights (1987)*
Slavery is one of the most controversial and arresting topics in humanhistory. The question of Islam in relation to slavery has been an issue ofconcern among scholars for a long time. It became a question in which manyOrientalists found a convenient gap to pass through in their attacks againstthe system of governance and justice in Islam. This self-righteous criticismagainst the attitude of Islam towards slavery is part of a long Western traditionof scholarship based on stereotyping, overstating, and selectivity of Islamin particular and the Orient in general. Most of the time, the statements ofthese scholars are presented in a sugar-coated style of language that is moredangerous than if they were presented in a critical, open, and direct language.Thomas Carlyle, Renan, Goldziher, Macdonald, von Grunebaum, Gibb andBernard Lewis are good examples and representatives of this tradition. *This article was first published in the American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences 4, no. 1 (1987): 31-50
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Bir Modern Zamanlar Alimi Olarak Şeyh Google: İnternet, Geleneksel Ulema ve Kendi Kendine Öğrenme Egemenlik öncesi İslami Meşrutiyetçilik: 1861 Tunus Anayasası’nın İki Müdafaası Düşüncenin Sınır Taşları Ötesinde TANRI İslâmi İktisat Analizinin Yeni Bir Çerçevesine Doğru İslam ve Toplum Araştırmaları, Amerika Dergisi (AJIS) Hakkında
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1