前十字韧带损伤手术和保守治疗三个月后的创伤后骨水肿及其与疼痛的相关性:IODA 试点研究的探索性分析

R. Ulenaers, F. Ghafelzadeh, A. Smeets, P. Geens, K. Peers
{"title":"前十字韧带损伤手术和保守治疗三个月后的创伤后骨水肿及其与疼痛的相关性:IODA 试点研究的探索性分析","authors":"R. Ulenaers, F. Ghafelzadeh, A. Smeets, P. Geens, K. Peers","doi":"10.47671/tvg.79.23.119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Posttraumatic bone edema three months after anterior cruciate ligament injury and correlation with pain, a comparison between operatively and conservatively treated patients: an exploratory analysis of the IODA pilot trial\n\n \n\nBackground/Purpose: Recent years have seen a surge of research comparing conservative treatment with immediate surgery for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, with some studies reporting comparable clinical outcomes between both approaches. In this study, we aim to compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in both treatment groups, in particular bone edema.\n\n \n\nMethods: This randomized controlled trial involved 25 patients with an acute ACL injury who were assigned to 1) immediate ACL reconstruction or 2) conservative treatment with optional delayed surgery. (1) Two MRI scans were conducted, at the time of injury and after three months, and scored using the Anterior Cruciate Ligament OsteoArthritis Score (ACLOAS). Pain was assessed using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). A multivariate linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of both treatments on bone edema evolution; while a bivariate correlation analysis was conducted to examine the possible relationship between bone edema and pain.\n\n \n\nResults: Type of treatment had a significant influence on the amount of bone edema after three months, after correcting for bone edema at diagnosis, with higher scores in the operative group. No significant correlation was observed between bone edema and pain at the time of injury (r=0,183, p=0,403) or after three months (r=0,161, p=0,499).\n\n \n\nConclusion: Our findings suggest that ACL reconstruction may have an adverse effect on the amount of bone edema at three months, although no significant correlation was seen between bone edema and pain. Further analysis with larger sample size are planned (IODA trial).","PeriodicalId":507632,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Posttraumatisch botoedeem drie maanden na operatieve en conservatieve behandeling van een voorste kruisbandletsel en de correlatie met pijn: een exploratieve analyse van de IODA piloot studi\",\"authors\":\"R. Ulenaers, F. Ghafelzadeh, A. Smeets, P. Geens, K. Peers\",\"doi\":\"10.47671/tvg.79.23.119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Posttraumatic bone edema three months after anterior cruciate ligament injury and correlation with pain, a comparison between operatively and conservatively treated patients: an exploratory analysis of the IODA pilot trial\\n\\n \\n\\nBackground/Purpose: Recent years have seen a surge of research comparing conservative treatment with immediate surgery for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, with some studies reporting comparable clinical outcomes between both approaches. In this study, we aim to compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in both treatment groups, in particular bone edema.\\n\\n \\n\\nMethods: This randomized controlled trial involved 25 patients with an acute ACL injury who were assigned to 1) immediate ACL reconstruction or 2) conservative treatment with optional delayed surgery. (1) Two MRI scans were conducted, at the time of injury and after three months, and scored using the Anterior Cruciate Ligament OsteoArthritis Score (ACLOAS). Pain was assessed using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). A multivariate linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of both treatments on bone edema evolution; while a bivariate correlation analysis was conducted to examine the possible relationship between bone edema and pain.\\n\\n \\n\\nResults: Type of treatment had a significant influence on the amount of bone edema after three months, after correcting for bone edema at diagnosis, with higher scores in the operative group. No significant correlation was observed between bone edema and pain at the time of injury (r=0,183, p=0,403) or after three months (r=0,161, p=0,499).\\n\\n \\n\\nConclusion: Our findings suggest that ACL reconstruction may have an adverse effect on the amount of bone edema at three months, although no significant correlation was seen between bone edema and pain. Further analysis with larger sample size are planned (IODA trial).\",\"PeriodicalId\":507632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47671/tvg.79.23.119\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47671/tvg.79.23.119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前十字韧带损伤三个月后创伤后骨水肿及与疼痛的相关性:手术治疗与保守治疗患者的比较:IODA 试验的探索性分析 背景/目的:近年来,对前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤的保守治疗和立即手术治疗进行比较的研究激增,一些研究报告两种方法的临床效果相当。在本研究中,我们旨在比较两种治疗组的磁共振成像(MRI)结果,尤其是骨水肿。方法:这项随机对照试验涉及 25 名急性前交叉韧带损伤患者,他们被分配到:1)立即进行前交叉韧带重建;2)保守治疗,可选择延迟手术。(1)分别在受伤时和三个月后进行两次核磁共振扫描,并使用前十字韧带骨性关节炎评分(ACLOAS)进行评分。疼痛采用膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分(KOOS)进行评估。为了评估两种治疗方法对骨水肿演变的影响,进行了多变量线性回归分析;为了研究骨水肿与疼痛之间可能存在的关系,进行了双变量相关分析。结果显示在校正诊断时的骨水肿后,治疗类型对三个月后的骨水肿量有显著影响,手术组的评分更高。受伤时(r=0,183,p=0,403)或三个月后(r=0,161,p=0,499),骨水肿与疼痛之间均无明显相关性。结论:我们的研究结果表明,前交叉韧带重建可能会对三个月后的骨水肿量产生不利影响,尽管骨水肿与疼痛之间没有明显的相关性。我们计划进行样本量更大的进一步分析(IODA 试验)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Posttraumatisch botoedeem drie maanden na operatieve en conservatieve behandeling van een voorste kruisbandletsel en de correlatie met pijn: een exploratieve analyse van de IODA piloot studi
Posttraumatic bone edema three months after anterior cruciate ligament injury and correlation with pain, a comparison between operatively and conservatively treated patients: an exploratory analysis of the IODA pilot trial Background/Purpose: Recent years have seen a surge of research comparing conservative treatment with immediate surgery for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, with some studies reporting comparable clinical outcomes between both approaches. In this study, we aim to compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in both treatment groups, in particular bone edema. Methods: This randomized controlled trial involved 25 patients with an acute ACL injury who were assigned to 1) immediate ACL reconstruction or 2) conservative treatment with optional delayed surgery. (1) Two MRI scans were conducted, at the time of injury and after three months, and scored using the Anterior Cruciate Ligament OsteoArthritis Score (ACLOAS). Pain was assessed using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). A multivariate linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of both treatments on bone edema evolution; while a bivariate correlation analysis was conducted to examine the possible relationship between bone edema and pain. Results: Type of treatment had a significant influence on the amount of bone edema after three months, after correcting for bone edema at diagnosis, with higher scores in the operative group. No significant correlation was observed between bone edema and pain at the time of injury (r=0,183, p=0,403) or after three months (r=0,161, p=0,499). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that ACL reconstruction may have an adverse effect on the amount of bone edema at three months, although no significant correlation was seen between bone edema and pain. Further analysis with larger sample size are planned (IODA trial).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cerebrale ischemie als oorzaak van verminderd bewustzijn: het Percheron-infarct E-book: Antibiotica(resistentie) – Uitgave 2024 QTc-verlenging door antipsychoticagebruik binnen de kinder- en jeugdpsychiatrie: een systematische literatuurstudie Transmediastinale migratie van een Kirschner-pin na fixatie van een proximale humerusfractuur: een casus MCT bij ouderen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1