机器学习对人员甄选的影响

IF 3.1 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Organizational Dynamics Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2024.101035
Emily D. Campion , Michael A. Campion
{"title":"机器学习对人员甄选的影响","authors":"Emily D. Campion ,&nbsp;Michael A. Campion","doi":"10.1016/j.orgdyn.2024.101035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The purpose of this article is to describe the impact of artificial intelligence (AI), and specifically Machine Learning (ML) and Natural Language Processing<span> (NLP), on personnel selection<span> in terms of potential uses, challenges for practice, and recommendations based on the most recent advances in the science. We argue that ML will likely have as big of an influence on hiring procedures as the equal employment laws did in the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s. We start by describing why personnel selection is an obvious application of ML, followed by a brief definition of the types of ML and key terms. In the first section, we describe the most common currently known uses of ML in personnel selection, along with a brief summary of the scientific evidence supporting the uses and potential pros and cons. In the second section, we describe the challenges and issues managers will face in using ML in selection and provide some preliminary advice as to how to address them. Challenges include the influence on adverse impact against diversity subgroups of candidates, explainability of the algorithms, validation and legal defensibility, new emerging state laws governing AI, the potential use of AI tools by candidates, likely future developments, and whether to make or buy should organizations decide to pursue ML for selection. We end with a set of recommendations for managers, concluding that the choice is probably when, rather than if, to adopt ML in personnel selection.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48061,"journal":{"name":"Organizational Dynamics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of machine learning on personnel selection\",\"authors\":\"Emily D. Campion ,&nbsp;Michael A. Campion\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.orgdyn.2024.101035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The purpose of this article is to describe the impact of artificial intelligence (AI), and specifically Machine Learning (ML) and Natural Language Processing<span> (NLP), on personnel selection<span> in terms of potential uses, challenges for practice, and recommendations based on the most recent advances in the science. We argue that ML will likely have as big of an influence on hiring procedures as the equal employment laws did in the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s. We start by describing why personnel selection is an obvious application of ML, followed by a brief definition of the types of ML and key terms. In the first section, we describe the most common currently known uses of ML in personnel selection, along with a brief summary of the scientific evidence supporting the uses and potential pros and cons. In the second section, we describe the challenges and issues managers will face in using ML in selection and provide some preliminary advice as to how to address them. Challenges include the influence on adverse impact against diversity subgroups of candidates, explainability of the algorithms, validation and legal defensibility, new emerging state laws governing AI, the potential use of AI tools by candidates, likely future developments, and whether to make or buy should organizations decide to pursue ML for selection. We end with a set of recommendations for managers, concluding that the choice is probably when, rather than if, to adopt ML in personnel selection.</span></span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Organizational Dynamics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Organizational Dynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090261624000081\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organizational Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090261624000081","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在描述人工智能(AI),特别是机器学习(ML)和自然语言处理(NLP)对人员甄选的影响,包括潜在用途、实践挑战以及基于最新科学进展的建议。我们认为,ML 对招聘程序的影响可能不亚于 20 世纪 60、70 和 80 年代的平等就业法。首先,我们介绍了为什么人事选拔是人工智能的一个明显应用,然后简要定义了人工智能的类型和关键术语。在第一部分中,我们将介绍目前已知的最常见的人事甄选中使用的人工合成方法,并简要概述支持这些方法的科学证据以及潜在的利弊。在第二部分中,我们将介绍管理人员在使用 ML 进行选拔时将面临的挑战和问题,并就如何应对这些挑战和问题提供一些初步建议。这些挑战包括对候选人多样性子群的不利影响、算法的可解释性、验证和法律辩护、新出现的国家人工智能法律、候选人对人工智能工具的潜在使用、未来可能的发展,以及如果组织决定使用人工智能进行选拔,是制造还是购买。最后,我们为管理者提出了一系列建议,并得出结论:在人事选拔中采用人工智能的选择可能是何时,而不是是否。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of machine learning on personnel selection

The purpose of this article is to describe the impact of artificial intelligence (AI), and specifically Machine Learning (ML) and Natural Language Processing (NLP), on personnel selection in terms of potential uses, challenges for practice, and recommendations based on the most recent advances in the science. We argue that ML will likely have as big of an influence on hiring procedures as the equal employment laws did in the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s. We start by describing why personnel selection is an obvious application of ML, followed by a brief definition of the types of ML and key terms. In the first section, we describe the most common currently known uses of ML in personnel selection, along with a brief summary of the scientific evidence supporting the uses and potential pros and cons. In the second section, we describe the challenges and issues managers will face in using ML in selection and provide some preliminary advice as to how to address them. Challenges include the influence on adverse impact against diversity subgroups of candidates, explainability of the algorithms, validation and legal defensibility, new emerging state laws governing AI, the potential use of AI tools by candidates, likely future developments, and whether to make or buy should organizations decide to pursue ML for selection. We end with a set of recommendations for managers, concluding that the choice is probably when, rather than if, to adopt ML in personnel selection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Organizational Dynamics domain is primarily organizational behavior and development and secondarily, HRM and strategic management. The objective is to link leading-edge thought and research with management practice. Organizational Dynamics publishes articles that embody both theoretical and practical content, showing how research findings can help deal more effectively with the dynamics of organizational life.
期刊最新文献
Trio of human, old and new copilots: Collaborative accountability of human, manuals/standards, and artificial intelligence (AI) Positive mindset: PsyCap’s roles in PERMA+4 and positive organizational psychology, behavior, and scholarship 2.0 Design thinking: Executing your organization's commitment to customer centricity Editorial Board Often wrong, never in doubt: Mitigating leadership overconfidence in decision-making
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1