拉格朗日室内颗粒物迁移模拟的质量控制:粒子数、通风策略和采样量的影响

IF 3.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Journal of Aerosol Science Pub Date : 2024-02-15 DOI:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2024.106346
Ye Seul Eom, Donghyun Rim
{"title":"拉格朗日室内颗粒物迁移模拟的质量控制:粒子数、通风策略和采样量的影响","authors":"Ye Seul Eom,&nbsp;Donghyun Rim","doi":"10.1016/j.jaerosci.2024.106346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Airborne particle transport in indoor environments plays an important role in occupant exposure to aerosols and public health problems. Several studies have examined indoor airflow and particle transport using computational fluid dynamics models. For the Lagrangian particle tracking model, the minimum particle concentration necessary for accurate prediction may vary with the airflow regime and sampling volume. Nonetheless, only a few studies have systematically quantified suitable particle numbers and sampling volumes, according to indoor airflow and ventilation conditions. This study addresses this gap by exploring quality control strategies for a Lagrangian particle tracking model to reliably predict indoor particle transport. Based on transient simulations, we analyzed the spatiotemporal distributions of indoor particle trajectories while varying the number of particles, sampling volume, and ventilation strategy. The results indicate that in general a sampling volume of 5 L can predict the normalized mean concentrations better than a 1 L sampling volume, particularly when dealing with a smaller number of particles. Furthermore, the required particle number concentrations vary significantly depending on the chosen ventilation strategy. For instance, under the conditions of a 5 L sampling volume and an air exchange rate of 2.7 h<sup>−1</sup>, the minimum particle number concentrations for achieving reliable modeling predictions were observed to be 0.0075 cm<sup>−3</sup> for displacement ventilation and 0.015 cm<sup>−3</sup> for mixing ventilation. These results highlight the crucial role of the number of simulated particle trajectories in Lagrangian particle tracking models in determining prediction quality. The study findings suggest that quality control measures should acknowledge the significant variability in required particle numbers, which can often differ by an order of magnitude, contingent upon the specific combination of ventilation strategy and sampling volume.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14880,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aerosol Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality control of Lagrangian indoor particle transport simulation: Effects of particle numbers, ventilation strategy, and sampling volume\",\"authors\":\"Ye Seul Eom,&nbsp;Donghyun Rim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaerosci.2024.106346\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Airborne particle transport in indoor environments plays an important role in occupant exposure to aerosols and public health problems. Several studies have examined indoor airflow and particle transport using computational fluid dynamics models. For the Lagrangian particle tracking model, the minimum particle concentration necessary for accurate prediction may vary with the airflow regime and sampling volume. Nonetheless, only a few studies have systematically quantified suitable particle numbers and sampling volumes, according to indoor airflow and ventilation conditions. This study addresses this gap by exploring quality control strategies for a Lagrangian particle tracking model to reliably predict indoor particle transport. Based on transient simulations, we analyzed the spatiotemporal distributions of indoor particle trajectories while varying the number of particles, sampling volume, and ventilation strategy. The results indicate that in general a sampling volume of 5 L can predict the normalized mean concentrations better than a 1 L sampling volume, particularly when dealing with a smaller number of particles. Furthermore, the required particle number concentrations vary significantly depending on the chosen ventilation strategy. For instance, under the conditions of a 5 L sampling volume and an air exchange rate of 2.7 h<sup>−1</sup>, the minimum particle number concentrations for achieving reliable modeling predictions were observed to be 0.0075 cm<sup>−3</sup> for displacement ventilation and 0.015 cm<sup>−3</sup> for mixing ventilation. These results highlight the crucial role of the number of simulated particle trajectories in Lagrangian particle tracking models in determining prediction quality. The study findings suggest that quality control measures should acknowledge the significant variability in required particle numbers, which can often differ by an order of magnitude, contingent upon the specific combination of ventilation strategy and sampling volume.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Aerosol Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Aerosol Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021850224000132\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aerosol Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021850224000132","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

室内环境中的气载粒子传输在居住者暴露于气溶胶和公共健康问题中起着重要作用。一些研究利用计算流体动力学模型对室内气流和粒子传输进行了研究。对于拉格朗日粒子跟踪模型来说,准确预测所需的最小粒子浓度可能会随着气流机制和采样体积的变化而变化。然而,只有少数研究根据室内气流和通风条件系统地量化了合适的粒子数量和采样体积。本研究通过探索拉格朗日粒子跟踪模型的质量控制策略来填补这一空白,从而可靠地预测室内粒子传输。在瞬态模拟的基础上,我们分析了室内颗粒轨迹的时空分布,同时改变了颗粒数量、采样体积和通风策略。结果表明,一般来说,5 升的采样体积比 1 升的采样体积更能预测归一化平均浓度,尤其是在处理较少数量的粒子时。此外,根据所选通风策略的不同,所需的颗粒数浓度也有很大差异。例如,在 5 L 采样体积和 2.7 h-1 的空气交换率条件下,为实现可靠的模型预测,观察到置换通风的最小颗粒数浓度为 0.0075 cm-3,而混合通风的最小颗粒数浓度为 0.015 cm-3。这些结果凸显了拉格朗日粒子跟踪模型中模拟粒子轨迹的数量在决定预测质量方面的关键作用。研究结果表明,质量控制措施应考虑到所需粒子数的巨大差异,根据通风策略和取样量的具体组合,粒子数通常会相差一个数量级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quality control of Lagrangian indoor particle transport simulation: Effects of particle numbers, ventilation strategy, and sampling volume

Airborne particle transport in indoor environments plays an important role in occupant exposure to aerosols and public health problems. Several studies have examined indoor airflow and particle transport using computational fluid dynamics models. For the Lagrangian particle tracking model, the minimum particle concentration necessary for accurate prediction may vary with the airflow regime and sampling volume. Nonetheless, only a few studies have systematically quantified suitable particle numbers and sampling volumes, according to indoor airflow and ventilation conditions. This study addresses this gap by exploring quality control strategies for a Lagrangian particle tracking model to reliably predict indoor particle transport. Based on transient simulations, we analyzed the spatiotemporal distributions of indoor particle trajectories while varying the number of particles, sampling volume, and ventilation strategy. The results indicate that in general a sampling volume of 5 L can predict the normalized mean concentrations better than a 1 L sampling volume, particularly when dealing with a smaller number of particles. Furthermore, the required particle number concentrations vary significantly depending on the chosen ventilation strategy. For instance, under the conditions of a 5 L sampling volume and an air exchange rate of 2.7 h−1, the minimum particle number concentrations for achieving reliable modeling predictions were observed to be 0.0075 cm−3 for displacement ventilation and 0.015 cm−3 for mixing ventilation. These results highlight the crucial role of the number of simulated particle trajectories in Lagrangian particle tracking models in determining prediction quality. The study findings suggest that quality control measures should acknowledge the significant variability in required particle numbers, which can often differ by an order of magnitude, contingent upon the specific combination of ventilation strategy and sampling volume.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Aerosol Science
Journal of Aerosol Science 环境科学-工程:化工
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
8.90%
发文量
127
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Founded in 1970, the Journal of Aerosol Science considers itself the prime vehicle for the publication of original work as well as reviews related to fundamental and applied aerosol research, as well as aerosol instrumentation. Its content is directed at scientists working in engineering disciplines, as well as physics, chemistry, and environmental sciences. The editors welcome submissions of papers describing recent experimental, numerical, and theoretical research related to the following topics: 1. Fundamental Aerosol Science. 2. Applied Aerosol Science. 3. Instrumentation & Measurement Methods.
期刊最新文献
Non-linear optics for an online probing of the specific surface area of nanoparticles in the aerosol phase Computational and experimental investigation of an aerosol extraction device for use in dentistry Collision frequencies across collision regimes in two-component systems Enhanced organic aerosol formation induced by inorganic aerosol formed in laboratory photochemical experiments Development of a source-term migration model for a large bubble formed in a core disruptive accident
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1