解剖型全肩关节置换术后肩袖撕裂和无菌性关节盂松弛的风险因素

Q4 Medicine Seminars in Arthroplasty Pub Date : 2024-02-05 DOI:10.1053/j.sart.2024.01.002
Stephen A. Parada MD , Chris Peach FRCS (Tr & Orth), MD , Wen Fan MS , Josie Elwell PhD , Pierre-Henri Flurin MD , Thomas W. Wright MD , Joseph D. Zuckerman MD , Christopher P. Roche MSE, MBA
{"title":"解剖型全肩关节置换术后肩袖撕裂和无菌性关节盂松弛的风险因素","authors":"Stephen A. Parada MD ,&nbsp;Chris Peach FRCS (Tr & Orth), MD ,&nbsp;Wen Fan MS ,&nbsp;Josie Elwell PhD ,&nbsp;Pierre-Henri Flurin MD ,&nbsp;Thomas W. Wright MD ,&nbsp;Joseph D. Zuckerman MD ,&nbsp;Christopher P. Roche MSE, MBA","doi":"10.1053/j.sart.2024.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The purpose of this study is to retrospectively analyze all primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) patients within a multicenter international database of a single prosthesis to identify risk factors for patients with rotator cuff tear (RCT) and aseptic glenoid loosening.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>To investigate the risk factors for RCT and aseptic glenoid loosening, we retrospectively analyzed all aTSA patients with 2-year minimum follow-up from a multicenter international database of a single platform shoulder system, only excluding patients with a history of revision arthroplasty, infections, and humeral fractures. A univariate/multivariate analysis was conducted to compare primary aTSA patients who had report of: 1) a RCT and/or subscapularis failure and 2) aseptic glenoid loosening/cage glenoid dissociations, to identify the differences in (i) intrinsic patient demographics and comorbidities and (ii) implant and operative parameters. Finally, to adapt our statistical analysis for prospective identification of patients most at-risk for RCT and aseptic glenoid loosening, we stratified the dataset by multiple risk factor combinations and calculated the odds ratio (OR) to determine the impact of accumulating risk factors on the incidence rate of each complication.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>122 aTSA shoulders had a RCT for a rate of 3.2% and 123 aTSA shoulders had aseptic glenoid loosening for a rate of 3.3%. The multivariate analysis identified that aTSA patients with RCT were more likely to have previous shoulder surgery (<em>P</em> &lt; .001) and small size glenoids (<em>P</em> = .002). Additionally, the multivariate analysis identified that aTSA patients with aseptic glenoid loosening were more likely to be younger (≤62 years at the time of surgery, <em>P</em> = .001), have small size glenoids (<em>P</em> = .033) and have a nonhybrid glenoids (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). Stratifying patients with multiple risk factors identified multiple aTSA cohorts with ORs &gt;2 for RCT or aseptic glenoid loosening.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>This analysis of 2699 primary aTSA identified risk factors for the two most common postoperative complications: RCTs and aseptic glenoid loosening. Using these risk factors, we calculated ORs for patient cohorts with multiple risk factors to identify the patients with the greatest risk for each complication. This information is useful to guide the surgeon in their preoperative counseling and potentially mitigate the occurrence of these complications, by indicating patients with these risk-factors for alternative treatment strategies, like rTSA, instead of aTSA.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39885,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","volume":"34 2","pages":"Pages 406-415"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk factors for rotator cuff tears and aseptic glenoid loosening after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty\",\"authors\":\"Stephen A. Parada MD ,&nbsp;Chris Peach FRCS (Tr & Orth), MD ,&nbsp;Wen Fan MS ,&nbsp;Josie Elwell PhD ,&nbsp;Pierre-Henri Flurin MD ,&nbsp;Thomas W. Wright MD ,&nbsp;Joseph D. Zuckerman MD ,&nbsp;Christopher P. Roche MSE, MBA\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.sart.2024.01.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The purpose of this study is to retrospectively analyze all primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) patients within a multicenter international database of a single prosthesis to identify risk factors for patients with rotator cuff tear (RCT) and aseptic glenoid loosening.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>To investigate the risk factors for RCT and aseptic glenoid loosening, we retrospectively analyzed all aTSA patients with 2-year minimum follow-up from a multicenter international database of a single platform shoulder system, only excluding patients with a history of revision arthroplasty, infections, and humeral fractures. A univariate/multivariate analysis was conducted to compare primary aTSA patients who had report of: 1) a RCT and/or subscapularis failure and 2) aseptic glenoid loosening/cage glenoid dissociations, to identify the differences in (i) intrinsic patient demographics and comorbidities and (ii) implant and operative parameters. Finally, to adapt our statistical analysis for prospective identification of patients most at-risk for RCT and aseptic glenoid loosening, we stratified the dataset by multiple risk factor combinations and calculated the odds ratio (OR) to determine the impact of accumulating risk factors on the incidence rate of each complication.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>122 aTSA shoulders had a RCT for a rate of 3.2% and 123 aTSA shoulders had aseptic glenoid loosening for a rate of 3.3%. The multivariate analysis identified that aTSA patients with RCT were more likely to have previous shoulder surgery (<em>P</em> &lt; .001) and small size glenoids (<em>P</em> = .002). Additionally, the multivariate analysis identified that aTSA patients with aseptic glenoid loosening were more likely to be younger (≤62 years at the time of surgery, <em>P</em> = .001), have small size glenoids (<em>P</em> = .033) and have a nonhybrid glenoids (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). Stratifying patients with multiple risk factors identified multiple aTSA cohorts with ORs &gt;2 for RCT or aseptic glenoid loosening.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>This analysis of 2699 primary aTSA identified risk factors for the two most common postoperative complications: RCTs and aseptic glenoid loosening. Using these risk factors, we calculated ORs for patient cohorts with multiple risk factors to identify the patients with the greatest risk for each complication. This information is useful to guide the surgeon in their preoperative counseling and potentially mitigate the occurrence of these complications, by indicating patients with these risk-factors for alternative treatment strategies, like rTSA, instead of aTSA.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Arthroplasty\",\"volume\":\"34 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 406-415\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Arthroplasty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045452724000130\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045452724000130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:本研究的目的是回顾性分析一个多中心国际数据库中单个假体的所有原发性解剖型全肩关节置换术(aTSA)患者,以确定肩袖撕裂(RCT)和无菌性盂骨松动患者,从而确定这些并发症的发生率。此外,我们还试图将这些并发症的患者群与未出现这些并发症的患者群进行比较,以确定每种并发症类型的风险因素。方法:aTSA 患者被前瞻性地纳入了单平台肩关节系统(Equinoxe; Exactech Inc, Gainesville, FL)的多中心国际数据库。数据收集工作在美国和欧洲的 37 个不同临床研究机构进行,根据 IRB 批准的方案使用标准化表格收集数据。每位患者都经过了同意,所有数据都是在每个地点收集的,并直接上传到安全的 IBM 中央数据库。这些标准化表格收集了人口统计学数据、诊断、合并症、植入物大小/类型、术前活动范围、术前放射学检查结果和术前临床结果指标评分。为了研究RCT的风险因素以及无菌性盂骨松动的风险因素,我们回顾性分析了该数据库中所有aTSA患者的数据,仅排除了有翻修关节成形术史和肱骨骨折的患者。我们进行了单变量统计分析,以比较有以下报告的原发性 aTSA 患者:1)有 RCT 和/或亚临床研究报告的患者:1)RCT和/或肩胛下肌失败;2)无菌性盂骨松动的初治 aTSA 患者与
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk factors for rotator cuff tears and aseptic glenoid loosening after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty

Background

The purpose of this study is to retrospectively analyze all primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) patients within a multicenter international database of a single prosthesis to identify risk factors for patients with rotator cuff tear (RCT) and aseptic glenoid loosening.

Methods

To investigate the risk factors for RCT and aseptic glenoid loosening, we retrospectively analyzed all aTSA patients with 2-year minimum follow-up from a multicenter international database of a single platform shoulder system, only excluding patients with a history of revision arthroplasty, infections, and humeral fractures. A univariate/multivariate analysis was conducted to compare primary aTSA patients who had report of: 1) a RCT and/or subscapularis failure and 2) aseptic glenoid loosening/cage glenoid dissociations, to identify the differences in (i) intrinsic patient demographics and comorbidities and (ii) implant and operative parameters. Finally, to adapt our statistical analysis for prospective identification of patients most at-risk for RCT and aseptic glenoid loosening, we stratified the dataset by multiple risk factor combinations and calculated the odds ratio (OR) to determine the impact of accumulating risk factors on the incidence rate of each complication.

Results

122 aTSA shoulders had a RCT for a rate of 3.2% and 123 aTSA shoulders had aseptic glenoid loosening for a rate of 3.3%. The multivariate analysis identified that aTSA patients with RCT were more likely to have previous shoulder surgery (P < .001) and small size glenoids (P = .002). Additionally, the multivariate analysis identified that aTSA patients with aseptic glenoid loosening were more likely to be younger (≤62 years at the time of surgery, P = .001), have small size glenoids (P = .033) and have a nonhybrid glenoids (P < .001). Stratifying patients with multiple risk factors identified multiple aTSA cohorts with ORs >2 for RCT or aseptic glenoid loosening.

Discussion

This analysis of 2699 primary aTSA identified risk factors for the two most common postoperative complications: RCTs and aseptic glenoid loosening. Using these risk factors, we calculated ORs for patient cohorts with multiple risk factors to identify the patients with the greatest risk for each complication. This information is useful to guide the surgeon in their preoperative counseling and potentially mitigate the occurrence of these complications, by indicating patients with these risk-factors for alternative treatment strategies, like rTSA, instead of aTSA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Arthroplasty
Seminars in Arthroplasty Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
期刊介绍: Each issue of Seminars in Arthroplasty provides a comprehensive, current overview of a single topic in arthroplasty. The journal addresses orthopedic surgeons, providing authoritative reviews with emphasis on new developments relevant to their practice.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Comparing comorbidity burden between patients undergoing ambulatory rotator cuff repair vs. inpatient anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty Reaching MCID, SCB, and PASS for ASES, SANE, SST, and VAS following shoulder arthroplasty does not correlate with patient satisfaction Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty using hybrid glenoid fixation with a porous-coated titanium post. Two- to ten-year follow-up of 256 cases with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1