心脏手术患者围手术期使用沙库比妥/缬沙坦的相关临床疗效:系统性综述

Q4 Medicine REC: CardioClinics Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rccl.2024.01.004
{"title":"心脏手术患者围手术期使用沙库比妥/缬沙坦的相关临床疗效:系统性综述","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.rccl.2024.01.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><p>Sacubitril/valsartan (SV) is recommended in patients with heart failure, especially in reduced ejection fraction. So far, the safety of its use in perioperative cardiac surgery is uncertain but given its mechanism of action and possible blood pressure lowering effect, some guidelines recommend discontinuation, without clear evidence. This systematic review aims to assess clinical outcomes of use SV in the perioperative period compared with never having used it or its withdrawal.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Systematic literature review in MedLine, Cochrane, EMBASE and LILACs of studies published in English and Spanish. We included randomized clinical trials and non-randomized studies evaluating adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery that compared the use of SV up to the day of surgery versus stopping or not starting it prior to the procedure. In-hospital and 30-day mortality, length of stay in general ward and intensive care unit stay, orotracheal intubation, postoperative vasoplegia and need for renal replacement therapy were assessed. Quality was assessed using the ROBINS tool.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Three non-randomized studies were included, one single-arm. There were fewer cases of in-hospital and 30-day mortality in the group in which SV was not discontinued, with no statistically significant difference. There was no difference in length of hospital or intensive care unit stay, orotracheal intubation, need for renal replacement therapy, or frequency of postoperative vasoplegia (OR, 0.77; 95%CI, 0.23–2.98).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The current evidence is scarce and of low quality so a recommendation regarding the use of SV prior to cardiac surgery cannot be generated, further studies are required.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36870,"journal":{"name":"REC: CardioClinics","volume":"59 3","pages":"Pages 169-176"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical outcomes associated with the use of sacubitril/valsartan in the perioperative period of patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a systematic review\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rccl.2024.01.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><p>Sacubitril/valsartan (SV) is recommended in patients with heart failure, especially in reduced ejection fraction. So far, the safety of its use in perioperative cardiac surgery is uncertain but given its mechanism of action and possible blood pressure lowering effect, some guidelines recommend discontinuation, without clear evidence. This systematic review aims to assess clinical outcomes of use SV in the perioperative period compared with never having used it or its withdrawal.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Systematic literature review in MedLine, Cochrane, EMBASE and LILACs of studies published in English and Spanish. We included randomized clinical trials and non-randomized studies evaluating adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery that compared the use of SV up to the day of surgery versus stopping or not starting it prior to the procedure. In-hospital and 30-day mortality, length of stay in general ward and intensive care unit stay, orotracheal intubation, postoperative vasoplegia and need for renal replacement therapy were assessed. Quality was assessed using the ROBINS tool.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Three non-randomized studies were included, one single-arm. There were fewer cases of in-hospital and 30-day mortality in the group in which SV was not discontinued, with no statistically significant difference. There was no difference in length of hospital or intensive care unit stay, orotracheal intubation, need for renal replacement therapy, or frequency of postoperative vasoplegia (OR, 0.77; 95%CI, 0.23–2.98).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The current evidence is scarce and of low quality so a recommendation regarding the use of SV prior to cardiac surgery cannot be generated, further studies are required.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36870,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"REC: CardioClinics\",\"volume\":\"59 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 169-176\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"REC: CardioClinics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2605153224000062\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REC: CardioClinics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2605153224000062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言和目的心力衰竭患者,尤其是射血分数降低的患者,建议使用沙奎利/缬沙坦(SV)。迄今为止,在心脏手术围手术期使用该药物的安全性尚不确定,但考虑到其作用机制和可能的降压效果,一些指南在没有明确证据的情况下建议停用该药物。本系统性综述旨在评估围术期使用 SV 与从未使用或停用 SV 的临床效果。方法在 MedLine、Cochrane、EMBASE 和 LILACs 中对用英语和西班牙语发表的研究进行系统性文献综述。我们纳入了对接受心脏手术的成年患者进行评估的随机临床试验和非随机研究,这些研究比较了在手术当天使用 SV 与在手术前停止或不使用 SV 的情况。对住院和 30 天死亡率、普通病房和重症监护室住院时间、气管插管、术后血管麻痹和肾脏替代疗法需求进行了评估。结果纳入了三项非随机研究,其中一项为单臂研究。未停止 SV 治疗组的院内死亡率和 30 天死亡率较低,差异无统计学意义。在住院时间或重症监护室停留时间、气管插管、肾脏替代疗法需求或术后血管痉挛发生频率方面没有差异(OR,0.77;95%CI,0.23-2.98)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical outcomes associated with the use of sacubitril/valsartan in the perioperative period of patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a systematic review

Introduction and objectives

Sacubitril/valsartan (SV) is recommended in patients with heart failure, especially in reduced ejection fraction. So far, the safety of its use in perioperative cardiac surgery is uncertain but given its mechanism of action and possible blood pressure lowering effect, some guidelines recommend discontinuation, without clear evidence. This systematic review aims to assess clinical outcomes of use SV in the perioperative period compared with never having used it or its withdrawal.

Methods

Systematic literature review in MedLine, Cochrane, EMBASE and LILACs of studies published in English and Spanish. We included randomized clinical trials and non-randomized studies evaluating adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery that compared the use of SV up to the day of surgery versus stopping or not starting it prior to the procedure. In-hospital and 30-day mortality, length of stay in general ward and intensive care unit stay, orotracheal intubation, postoperative vasoplegia and need for renal replacement therapy were assessed. Quality was assessed using the ROBINS tool.

Results

Three non-randomized studies were included, one single-arm. There were fewer cases of in-hospital and 30-day mortality in the group in which SV was not discontinued, with no statistically significant difference. There was no difference in length of hospital or intensive care unit stay, orotracheal intubation, need for renal replacement therapy, or frequency of postoperative vasoplegia (OR, 0.77; 95%CI, 0.23–2.98).

Conclusions

The current evidence is scarce and of low quality so a recommendation regarding the use of SV prior to cardiac surgery cannot be generated, further studies are required.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
REC: CardioClinics
REC: CardioClinics Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
33 days
期刊最新文献
Origen anómalo de la arteria pulmonar derecha en un adulto Characterizing the “iceberg peak” in valvular heart disease: Outcomes and costs of in-hospital procedures in Spain Non-invasive multiparametric assessment of intracardiac tumor Fibroelastoma papilar aórtico e ictus: un caso ilustrativo Underuse of systemic thrombolysis in pulmonary embolism: A single center retrospective observational study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1