MohammadHosein Zamanian, Zohreh Javadfar, Yahay Salimi, Mer Ali Rahimi, Elham Rabieenia, Akram Rahimi
{"title":"大剂量维生素 D 对重症监护病房 COVID-19 患者死亡率和住院时间的影响:随机临床试验","authors":"MohammadHosein Zamanian, Zohreh Javadfar, Yahay Salimi, Mer Ali Rahimi, Elham Rabieenia, Akram Rahimi","doi":"10.5812/jkums-140510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Evidence indicating the effect of vitamin D supplementation on improving the clinical outcomes of COVID-19 is limited. Objectives: This study aimed to examine the effect of high-dose vitamin D on mortality and hospital length of stay in ICU patients with COVID-19. Methods: A single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial study was conducted on 61 patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 hospitalized in the ICU of Golestan Hospital, Kermanshah, Iran. Participants were randomly divided to receive a single dose of 300 000 IU vitamin D3 intramuscularly (n = 31) or placebo (n = 30). The primary outcomes were the length of hospital stay and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were the length of stay in the ICU, the number of patients requiring mechanical ventilation, and the serum level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D. Results: Out of 61 randomized patients, 44 patients with a mean age of 53.49 ± 13.2 years, body mass index of 29.80 ± 5.0 kg/m2, and serum vitamin D level of 24.36 ± 4.47 mg/dL were included in the study for primary analysis, of whom 31 (70.5%) cases were men. Median (interquartile range), the length of hospital stay between the vitamin D group (5.0 [6.0 - 11.0] days), placebo group (11.0 [6.0 - 17.0] days) (log-rank P = 0.23; unadjusted hazard ratio [HR] for hospital discharge, 3.4 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4 - 28.05]; P = 0.25; adjusted HR, 0.04 [95%CI, 11.52 - 0.0001]; P = 0.27) and mortality (unadjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.63 [95% CI,0.09 - 4.21]; P = 0.63; adjusted OR, 0.46 [95%CI, 0.03 - 6.55]; P = 0.57) showed no significant difference between the two groups before and after the adjustment of confounding factors. No significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding the need for mechanical ventilation (unadjusted OR for intubation = 2.1 [95% CI, 0.17 - 25.01]; P = 0.55), adjusted OR = 1.16 [95%CI, 0.04 - 27.57]; P = 0.92), and the length of stay in ICUs (log-rank = 2.49, P = 0.114; unadjusted HR for ICU discharge, 6.28 [95%CI, 0.5 - 78.42]; P = 0.15; adjusted HR = 21.48 [95%CI, 0.12 - 3677.48]; P = 0.24). Conclusions: Based on the results, A high dose of vitamin D did not significantly reduce mortality and hospital length of stay in ICU patients with COVID-19.","PeriodicalId":507382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences","volume":"75 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of High-Dose Vitamin D on Mortality and Hospital Length of Stay in ICU Patients with COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial\",\"authors\":\"MohammadHosein Zamanian, Zohreh Javadfar, Yahay Salimi, Mer Ali Rahimi, Elham Rabieenia, Akram Rahimi\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/jkums-140510\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Evidence indicating the effect of vitamin D supplementation on improving the clinical outcomes of COVID-19 is limited. Objectives: This study aimed to examine the effect of high-dose vitamin D on mortality and hospital length of stay in ICU patients with COVID-19. Methods: A single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial study was conducted on 61 patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 hospitalized in the ICU of Golestan Hospital, Kermanshah, Iran. Participants were randomly divided to receive a single dose of 300 000 IU vitamin D3 intramuscularly (n = 31) or placebo (n = 30). The primary outcomes were the length of hospital stay and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were the length of stay in the ICU, the number of patients requiring mechanical ventilation, and the serum level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D. Results: Out of 61 randomized patients, 44 patients with a mean age of 53.49 ± 13.2 years, body mass index of 29.80 ± 5.0 kg/m2, and serum vitamin D level of 24.36 ± 4.47 mg/dL were included in the study for primary analysis, of whom 31 (70.5%) cases were men. Median (interquartile range), the length of hospital stay between the vitamin D group (5.0 [6.0 - 11.0] days), placebo group (11.0 [6.0 - 17.0] days) (log-rank P = 0.23; unadjusted hazard ratio [HR] for hospital discharge, 3.4 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4 - 28.05]; P = 0.25; adjusted HR, 0.04 [95%CI, 11.52 - 0.0001]; P = 0.27) and mortality (unadjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.63 [95% CI,0.09 - 4.21]; P = 0.63; adjusted OR, 0.46 [95%CI, 0.03 - 6.55]; P = 0.57) showed no significant difference between the two groups before and after the adjustment of confounding factors. No significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding the need for mechanical ventilation (unadjusted OR for intubation = 2.1 [95% CI, 0.17 - 25.01]; P = 0.55), adjusted OR = 1.16 [95%CI, 0.04 - 27.57]; P = 0.92), and the length of stay in ICUs (log-rank = 2.49, P = 0.114; unadjusted HR for ICU discharge, 6.28 [95%CI, 0.5 - 78.42]; P = 0.15; adjusted HR = 21.48 [95%CI, 0.12 - 3677.48]; P = 0.24). Conclusions: Based on the results, A high dose of vitamin D did not significantly reduce mortality and hospital length of stay in ICU patients with COVID-19.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"75 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/jkums-140510\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/jkums-140510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:有关补充维生素 D 对改善 COVID-19 临床疗效的证据有限。研究目的本研究旨在探讨大剂量维生素 D 对 COVID-19 ICU 患者死亡率和住院时间的影响。研究方法在伊朗克尔曼沙阿市戈勒斯坦医院重症监护室住院的 61 名中重度 COVID-19 患者中开展了一项单中心、双盲、安慰剂对照、随机临床试验研究。参与者被随机分为肌肉注射单剂量 300 000 IU 维生素 D3(31 人)或安慰剂(30 人)。主要结果是住院时间和院内死亡率。次要结果是重症监护室的住院时间、需要机械通气的患者人数以及血清中 25- 羟维生素 D 的水平:在 61 名随机患者中,44 名患者的平均年龄为(53.49 ± 13.2)岁,体重指数为(29.80 ± 5.0)kg/m2,血清维生素 D 水平为(24.36 ± 4.47)mg/dL,其中 31 例(70.5%)为男性。维生素 D 组(5.0 [6.0 - 11.0] 天)、安慰剂组(11.0 [6.0 - 17.0] 天)的住院时间中位数(四分位数间距)(对数秩 P = 0.23;未调整出院危险比 [HR],3.4 [95% 置信区间 [CI],0.4 - 28.05];P = 0.25;调整后 HR,0.04 [95%CI,11.52 - 0.0001];P = 0.27)和死亡率(未调整的几率比[OR],0.63 [95% CI,0.09 - 4.21];P = 0.63;调整后的 OR,0.46 [95%CI,0.03 - 6.55];P = 0.57)显示两组在调整混杂因素前后无显著差异。两组在机械通气需求方面无明显差异(未调整插管 OR = 2.1 [95%CI, 0.17 - 25.01]; P = 0.55),调整后 OR = 1.16 [95%CI, 0.04 - 27.57]; P = 0.92),以及在 ICU 的住院时间(对数秩 = 2.49,P = 0.114;ICU 出院的未调整 HR,6.28 [95%CI, 0.5 - 78.42]; P = 0.15;调整 HR = 21.48 [95%CI, 0.12 - 3677.48]; P = 0.24)。结论根据研究结果,大剂量维生素 D 并不能显著降低 COVID-19 ICU 患者的死亡率和住院时间。
Effect of High-Dose Vitamin D on Mortality and Hospital Length of Stay in ICU Patients with COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Background: Evidence indicating the effect of vitamin D supplementation on improving the clinical outcomes of COVID-19 is limited. Objectives: This study aimed to examine the effect of high-dose vitamin D on mortality and hospital length of stay in ICU patients with COVID-19. Methods: A single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial study was conducted on 61 patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 hospitalized in the ICU of Golestan Hospital, Kermanshah, Iran. Participants were randomly divided to receive a single dose of 300 000 IU vitamin D3 intramuscularly (n = 31) or placebo (n = 30). The primary outcomes were the length of hospital stay and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were the length of stay in the ICU, the number of patients requiring mechanical ventilation, and the serum level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D. Results: Out of 61 randomized patients, 44 patients with a mean age of 53.49 ± 13.2 years, body mass index of 29.80 ± 5.0 kg/m2, and serum vitamin D level of 24.36 ± 4.47 mg/dL were included in the study for primary analysis, of whom 31 (70.5%) cases were men. Median (interquartile range), the length of hospital stay between the vitamin D group (5.0 [6.0 - 11.0] days), placebo group (11.0 [6.0 - 17.0] days) (log-rank P = 0.23; unadjusted hazard ratio [HR] for hospital discharge, 3.4 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4 - 28.05]; P = 0.25; adjusted HR, 0.04 [95%CI, 11.52 - 0.0001]; P = 0.27) and mortality (unadjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.63 [95% CI,0.09 - 4.21]; P = 0.63; adjusted OR, 0.46 [95%CI, 0.03 - 6.55]; P = 0.57) showed no significant difference between the two groups before and after the adjustment of confounding factors. No significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding the need for mechanical ventilation (unadjusted OR for intubation = 2.1 [95% CI, 0.17 - 25.01]; P = 0.55), adjusted OR = 1.16 [95%CI, 0.04 - 27.57]; P = 0.92), and the length of stay in ICUs (log-rank = 2.49, P = 0.114; unadjusted HR for ICU discharge, 6.28 [95%CI, 0.5 - 78.42]; P = 0.15; adjusted HR = 21.48 [95%CI, 0.12 - 3677.48]; P = 0.24). Conclusions: Based on the results, A high dose of vitamin D did not significantly reduce mortality and hospital length of stay in ICU patients with COVID-19.