Sabrina Köchli, Isabel Casso, Caroline Whyatt, Stefan Schmid, Marietta Ungerer, Yvonne Delevoye-Turrell, Dawn Rose
{"title":"帕金森氏症患者的功能活动能力评估:试点可行性研究和新方法论","authors":"Sabrina Köchli, Isabel Casso, Caroline Whyatt, Stefan Schmid, Marietta Ungerer, Yvonne Delevoye-Turrell, Dawn Rose","doi":"10.36950/2024.2ciss055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background \nParkinson’s disease (PD) is associated with motor impairments that negatively impact functional mobility (Armstrong & Okun, 2020). Functional mobility is “a person’s ability to move to accomplish activities of daily living” (Bouça-Machado et al., 2020). Whilst several assessment scales exist to evaluate PD, many focus on symptom severity or use speed as a proxy for quality of movement (e.g. Timed Up and Go; Buckley et al., 2019; Mirelman et al., 2019). Here we share the development of an integrated motion capture and pressure-sensitive gait mat sequence to assess functional mobility. \nDesign/Methods \nTo capture aspects of functional mobility accurately, we developed a new assessment protocol (FMA-P) to measure which aspects of movement differed between people with (n = 12) and without (n = 12) PD. The sequence involved rising from a chair, locomotion, turning, bending, picking up and placing an object (keys), and returning to sit down on the chair (mean of three trials). \nResults \nThe mean age of our participants was 65.25 ± 7.8 years, 46% females. We found significant differences in locomotion such as a lower step ratio (p = 0.023), stride length (p < 0.001), and stride velocity (p = 0.019), as well as a higher double support time (p = 0.004), and stride length variability (p = 0.004) in people with PD (PwP) compared to aged-matched healthy participants. PwP showed a lower toe-off set angle (p = 0.042), lower foot height (p = 0.007), and a lower heel strike angle (p = 0.006) during locomotion. Further, a lower shoulder-elbow arm swing angular velocity (p=0.042), and a higher elbow-wrist arm swing angular velocity (p = 0.054) were observed in PwP compared to controls. Getting up from a chair was associated with a lower inclination amplitude in PwP compared to healthy controls (p = 0.047). In the turning section, we found a later onset of pelvis rotation in PwP (p = 0.034). More time was required for PwP to pick the keys up from the floor compared to controls (p = 0.002). \nDiscussion \nThe new measurement protocol could contribute to early diagnosis of PD, offering a quantitative evaluation of functional mobility. For example, reduced toe and heel offset angles may be early determinants of developing shuffling in later disease stages. Moreover, our findings provide objective and precise information about a variety of qualitative aspects of functional mobility. This approach can therefore be used to evaluate change over time thereby improving the evidence base of outcome variables for intervention studies. The FMA-P is of high clinical relevance to aid in the quantitative evaluation of clinical measures of motor impairment. \nReferences \nArmstrong, M. J., & Okun, M. S. (2019). Diagnosis and treatment of Parkinson disease. A review. JAMA, 232(6), 548-560. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.22360 \nBouça-Machado, R., Duarte, G. S., Patriarca, M., Castro Caldas, A., Alarcão, J., Fernandes, R. M., Mestre, T. A.,, Matias, R., & Ferreira, J. J. (2020). Measurement instruments to assess functional mobility in Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review. Movement Disorders Clinical Practice, 7(2), 129-139. https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.12874 \nBuckely, C., Alcock, L., McArdle, R., Rana Zia Ur Rehman, R. Z. U., Del Din, S., Mazzà, C., Yarnall, A.J., & Rochester, L. (2019). The role of movement analysis in diagnosing and monitoring neurodegenerative conditions: Insights from gait and postural control. Brain Sciences, 9(2), Article 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci9020034 \nMirelman, A., Bonato, P., Cmicioli, R., Ellis, T. D., Giladi, N., Hamilton, J. L., Hass, C. J., Hausdorff, J. M., Pelosin, E., & Almeida Q. J. (2019). Gait impairments in Parkinson’s disease. The Lancet Neurology, 18(7), 697-708. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(19)30044-4","PeriodicalId":415194,"journal":{"name":"Current Issues in Sport Science (CISS)","volume":"52 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Functional mobility assessment in Parkinson’s: A pilot feasibility study and a new methodological approach\",\"authors\":\"Sabrina Köchli, Isabel Casso, Caroline Whyatt, Stefan Schmid, Marietta Ungerer, Yvonne Delevoye-Turrell, Dawn Rose\",\"doi\":\"10.36950/2024.2ciss055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background \\nParkinson’s disease (PD) is associated with motor impairments that negatively impact functional mobility (Armstrong & Okun, 2020). Functional mobility is “a person’s ability to move to accomplish activities of daily living” (Bouça-Machado et al., 2020). Whilst several assessment scales exist to evaluate PD, many focus on symptom severity or use speed as a proxy for quality of movement (e.g. Timed Up and Go; Buckley et al., 2019; Mirelman et al., 2019). Here we share the development of an integrated motion capture and pressure-sensitive gait mat sequence to assess functional mobility. \\nDesign/Methods \\nTo capture aspects of functional mobility accurately, we developed a new assessment protocol (FMA-P) to measure which aspects of movement differed between people with (n = 12) and without (n = 12) PD. The sequence involved rising from a chair, locomotion, turning, bending, picking up and placing an object (keys), and returning to sit down on the chair (mean of three trials). \\nResults \\nThe mean age of our participants was 65.25 ± 7.8 years, 46% females. We found significant differences in locomotion such as a lower step ratio (p = 0.023), stride length (p < 0.001), and stride velocity (p = 0.019), as well as a higher double support time (p = 0.004), and stride length variability (p = 0.004) in people with PD (PwP) compared to aged-matched healthy participants. PwP showed a lower toe-off set angle (p = 0.042), lower foot height (p = 0.007), and a lower heel strike angle (p = 0.006) during locomotion. Further, a lower shoulder-elbow arm swing angular velocity (p=0.042), and a higher elbow-wrist arm swing angular velocity (p = 0.054) were observed in PwP compared to controls. Getting up from a chair was associated with a lower inclination amplitude in PwP compared to healthy controls (p = 0.047). In the turning section, we found a later onset of pelvis rotation in PwP (p = 0.034). More time was required for PwP to pick the keys up from the floor compared to controls (p = 0.002). \\nDiscussion \\nThe new measurement protocol could contribute to early diagnosis of PD, offering a quantitative evaluation of functional mobility. For example, reduced toe and heel offset angles may be early determinants of developing shuffling in later disease stages. Moreover, our findings provide objective and precise information about a variety of qualitative aspects of functional mobility. This approach can therefore be used to evaluate change over time thereby improving the evidence base of outcome variables for intervention studies. The FMA-P is of high clinical relevance to aid in the quantitative evaluation of clinical measures of motor impairment. \\nReferences \\nArmstrong, M. J., & Okun, M. S. (2019). Diagnosis and treatment of Parkinson disease. A review. JAMA, 232(6), 548-560. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.22360 \\nBouça-Machado, R., Duarte, G. S., Patriarca, M., Castro Caldas, A., Alarcão, J., Fernandes, R. M., Mestre, T. A.,, Matias, R., & Ferreira, J. J. (2020). Measurement instruments to assess functional mobility in Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review. Movement Disorders Clinical Practice, 7(2), 129-139. https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.12874 \\nBuckely, C., Alcock, L., McArdle, R., Rana Zia Ur Rehman, R. Z. U., Del Din, S., Mazzà, C., Yarnall, A.J., & Rochester, L. (2019). The role of movement analysis in diagnosing and monitoring neurodegenerative conditions: Insights from gait and postural control. Brain Sciences, 9(2), Article 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci9020034 \\nMirelman, A., Bonato, P., Cmicioli, R., Ellis, T. D., Giladi, N., Hamilton, J. L., Hass, C. J., Hausdorff, J. M., Pelosin, E., & Almeida Q. J. (2019). Gait impairments in Parkinson’s disease. The Lancet Neurology, 18(7), 697-708. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(19)30044-4\",\"PeriodicalId\":415194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Issues in Sport Science (CISS)\",\"volume\":\"52 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Issues in Sport Science (CISS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36950/2024.2ciss055\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Issues in Sport Science (CISS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36950/2024.2ciss055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景 帕金森病(Parkinson's disease,PD)与运动障碍有关,运动障碍会对功能性活动能力产生负面影响(Armstrong & Okun,2020)。功能性移动能力是 "一个人完成日常生活活动的移动能力"(Bouça-Machado 等人,2020 年)。虽然有几种评估量表可用于评估帕金森病,但许多量表侧重于症状的严重程度,或使用速度作为运动质量的替代指标(例如,定时起床和走动;Buckley 等人,2019 年;Mirelman 等人,2019 年)。在此,我们分享了综合运动捕捉和压敏步态垫序列的开发过程,以评估功能移动性。设计/方法 为了准确捕捉功能移动性的各个方面,我们开发了一种新的评估方案(FMA-P),以测量有(n = 12)和无(n = 12)帕金森病患者在运动的哪些方面存在差异。评估顺序包括从椅子上站起来、移动、转身、弯腰、拿起并放置一个物品(钥匙),然后回到椅子上坐下(三次试验的平均值)。结果 参与者的平均年龄为 65.25 ± 7.8 岁,46% 为女性。我们发现,与年龄匹配的健康参与者相比,帕金森氏症患者(PwP)在运动方面存在明显差异,如步幅比(p = 0.023)、步长(p < 0.001)和步速(p = 0.019)较低,双支撑时间(p = 0.004)和步长变异性(p = 0.004)较高。在运动过程中,帕金森氏症患者表现出较低的脚尖起立角度(p = 0.042)、较低的脚高(p = 0.007)和较低的脚跟着地角度(p = 0.006)。此外,与对照组相比,患者的肩-肘手臂摆动角速度较低(p=0.042),肘-腕手臂摆动角速度较高(p=0.054)。与健康对照组相比,残疾人从椅子上站起来时的倾斜幅度较低(p = 0.047)。在翻身部分,我们发现残疾人骨盆旋转的开始时间较晚(p = 0.034)。与对照组相比,肢体残疾者从地上捡起钥匙所需的时间更长(p = 0.002)。讨论 新的测量方案可对功能活动度进行定量评估,有助于早期诊断帕金森病。例如,脚趾和脚跟偏移角度的减小可能是疾病晚期出现洗地动作的早期决定因素。此外,我们的研究结果还提供了有关功能活动度各种定性方面的客观而精确的信息。因此,这种方法可用于评估随时间推移而发生的变化,从而改善干预研究结果变量的证据基础。FMA-P具有很高的临床相关性,有助于对运动障碍的临床测量进行定量评估。参考文献 Armstrong, M. J., & Okun, M. S. (2019).帕金森病的诊断和治疗。综述。https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.22360 Bouça-Machado, R., Duarte, G. S., Patriarca, M., Castro Caldas, A., Alarcão, J., Fernandes, R. M., Mestre, T. A.,, Matias, R., & Ferreira, J. J. (2020)。评估帕金森病患者功能活动能力的测量工具:系统综述。https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.12874 Buckely, C., Alcock, L., McArdle, R., Rana Zia Ur Rehman, R. Z. U., Del Din, S., Mazzà, C., Yarnall, A.J., & Rochester, L. (2019)。运动分析在诊断和监测神经退行性疾病中的作用:步态和姿势控制的启示。https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci9020034 Mirelman, A., Bonato, P., Cmicioli, R., Ellis, T. D., Giladi, N., Hamilton, J. L., Hass, C. J., Hausdorff, J. M., Pelosin, E., & Almeida Q. J. (2019).帕金森病的步态障碍。柳叶刀神经学》,18(7),697-708。https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(19)30044-4
Functional mobility assessment in Parkinson’s: A pilot feasibility study and a new methodological approach
Background
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is associated with motor impairments that negatively impact functional mobility (Armstrong & Okun, 2020). Functional mobility is “a person’s ability to move to accomplish activities of daily living” (Bouça-Machado et al., 2020). Whilst several assessment scales exist to evaluate PD, many focus on symptom severity or use speed as a proxy for quality of movement (e.g. Timed Up and Go; Buckley et al., 2019; Mirelman et al., 2019). Here we share the development of an integrated motion capture and pressure-sensitive gait mat sequence to assess functional mobility.
Design/Methods
To capture aspects of functional mobility accurately, we developed a new assessment protocol (FMA-P) to measure which aspects of movement differed between people with (n = 12) and without (n = 12) PD. The sequence involved rising from a chair, locomotion, turning, bending, picking up and placing an object (keys), and returning to sit down on the chair (mean of three trials).
Results
The mean age of our participants was 65.25 ± 7.8 years, 46% females. We found significant differences in locomotion such as a lower step ratio (p = 0.023), stride length (p < 0.001), and stride velocity (p = 0.019), as well as a higher double support time (p = 0.004), and stride length variability (p = 0.004) in people with PD (PwP) compared to aged-matched healthy participants. PwP showed a lower toe-off set angle (p = 0.042), lower foot height (p = 0.007), and a lower heel strike angle (p = 0.006) during locomotion. Further, a lower shoulder-elbow arm swing angular velocity (p=0.042), and a higher elbow-wrist arm swing angular velocity (p = 0.054) were observed in PwP compared to controls. Getting up from a chair was associated with a lower inclination amplitude in PwP compared to healthy controls (p = 0.047). In the turning section, we found a later onset of pelvis rotation in PwP (p = 0.034). More time was required for PwP to pick the keys up from the floor compared to controls (p = 0.002).
Discussion
The new measurement protocol could contribute to early diagnosis of PD, offering a quantitative evaluation of functional mobility. For example, reduced toe and heel offset angles may be early determinants of developing shuffling in later disease stages. Moreover, our findings provide objective and precise information about a variety of qualitative aspects of functional mobility. This approach can therefore be used to evaluate change over time thereby improving the evidence base of outcome variables for intervention studies. The FMA-P is of high clinical relevance to aid in the quantitative evaluation of clinical measures of motor impairment.
References
Armstrong, M. J., & Okun, M. S. (2019). Diagnosis and treatment of Parkinson disease. A review. JAMA, 232(6), 548-560. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.22360
Bouça-Machado, R., Duarte, G. S., Patriarca, M., Castro Caldas, A., Alarcão, J., Fernandes, R. M., Mestre, T. A.,, Matias, R., & Ferreira, J. J. (2020). Measurement instruments to assess functional mobility in Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review. Movement Disorders Clinical Practice, 7(2), 129-139. https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.12874
Buckely, C., Alcock, L., McArdle, R., Rana Zia Ur Rehman, R. Z. U., Del Din, S., Mazzà, C., Yarnall, A.J., & Rochester, L. (2019). The role of movement analysis in diagnosing and monitoring neurodegenerative conditions: Insights from gait and postural control. Brain Sciences, 9(2), Article 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci9020034
Mirelman, A., Bonato, P., Cmicioli, R., Ellis, T. D., Giladi, N., Hamilton, J. L., Hass, C. J., Hausdorff, J. M., Pelosin, E., & Almeida Q. J. (2019). Gait impairments in Parkinson’s disease. The Lancet Neurology, 18(7), 697-708. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(19)30044-4