基于人工智能的遴选工具:考虑对残疾申请人的影响

IF 3.1 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Organizational Dynamics Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2024.101036
Sandra L. Fisher , Silvia Bonaccio , Catherine E. Connelly
{"title":"基于人工智能的遴选工具:考虑对残疾申请人的影响","authors":"Sandra L. Fisher ,&nbsp;Silvia Bonaccio ,&nbsp;Catherine E. Connelly","doi":"10.1016/j.orgdyn.2024.101036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Selection tools employing artificial intelligence (AI), such as automated video interviews (AVIs), chatbots, and assessment games, have become popular ways for organizations to deal with large numbers of job applicants. Vendors frequently claim that these technologies are unbiased. However, the impact of these tools on applicants with disabilities is rarely addressed. We explain how these tools may have both positive and negative impacts on applicants with disabilities. In doing so, we consider fundamental principles of selection: the reliability and validity of these tools as well as the applicant experience. We end by offering recommendations to organizations that are considering incorporating AI-based tools into their selection processes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48061,"journal":{"name":"Organizational Dynamics","volume":"53 1","pages":"Article 101036"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090261624000093/pdfft?md5=742455d148a7116ddea460e55be4e69a&pid=1-s2.0-S0090261624000093-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AI-based tools in selection: Considering the impact on applicants with disabilities\",\"authors\":\"Sandra L. Fisher ,&nbsp;Silvia Bonaccio ,&nbsp;Catherine E. Connelly\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.orgdyn.2024.101036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Selection tools employing artificial intelligence (AI), such as automated video interviews (AVIs), chatbots, and assessment games, have become popular ways for organizations to deal with large numbers of job applicants. Vendors frequently claim that these technologies are unbiased. However, the impact of these tools on applicants with disabilities is rarely addressed. We explain how these tools may have both positive and negative impacts on applicants with disabilities. In doing so, we consider fundamental principles of selection: the reliability and validity of these tools as well as the applicant experience. We end by offering recommendations to organizations that are considering incorporating AI-based tools into their selection processes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Organizational Dynamics\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 101036\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090261624000093/pdfft?md5=742455d148a7116ddea460e55be4e69a&pid=1-s2.0-S0090261624000093-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Organizational Dynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090261624000093\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organizational Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090261624000093","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

采用人工智能(AI)的选拔工具,如自动视频面试(AVI)、聊天机器人和测评游戏,已成为企业应对大量求职者的常用方法。供应商经常声称这些技术不带偏见。然而,这些工具对残疾求职者的影响却很少被提及。我们将解释这些工具如何对残疾求职者产生积极和消极的影响。在此过程中,我们会考虑遴选的基本原则:这些工具的可靠性和有效性以及申请人的体验。最后,我们向正在考虑将人工智能工具纳入其选拔流程的组织提出建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
AI-based tools in selection: Considering the impact on applicants with disabilities

Selection tools employing artificial intelligence (AI), such as automated video interviews (AVIs), chatbots, and assessment games, have become popular ways for organizations to deal with large numbers of job applicants. Vendors frequently claim that these technologies are unbiased. However, the impact of these tools on applicants with disabilities is rarely addressed. We explain how these tools may have both positive and negative impacts on applicants with disabilities. In doing so, we consider fundamental principles of selection: the reliability and validity of these tools as well as the applicant experience. We end by offering recommendations to organizations that are considering incorporating AI-based tools into their selection processes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Organizational Dynamics domain is primarily organizational behavior and development and secondarily, HRM and strategic management. The objective is to link leading-edge thought and research with management practice. Organizational Dynamics publishes articles that embody both theoretical and practical content, showing how research findings can help deal more effectively with the dynamics of organizational life.
期刊最新文献
Trio of human, old and new copilots: Collaborative accountability of human, manuals/standards, and artificial intelligence (AI) Positive mindset: PsyCap’s roles in PERMA+4 and positive organizational psychology, behavior, and scholarship 2.0 Design thinking: Executing your organization's commitment to customer centricity Editorial Board Often wrong, never in doubt: Mitigating leadership overconfidence in decision-making
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1