{"title":"约旦和巴勒斯坦银行信贷的决定因素:比较分析","authors":"Ruba Dirani, Mohammad Khataibeh, Ghassan Omet","doi":"10.17261/pressacademia.2023.1856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose- This paper analyzes the determinants of the annual changes in conventional banks’ credit in Jordan and Palestine. In addition, the paper examines whether the differences in the determinants of bank credit in both economies are due to country or bank-specific factors. As one might expect, the argument behind this paper rests on the fact that the Israeli occupation of Palestine makes the political and economic environments of the two countries very different.\nMethodology- A panel of data of all thirteen (13) Jordanian conventional banks and 12 Palestinian conventional banks are used in the econometric analyses (2010 – 2021). For each set of banks, the annual percentage changes in credit are regresed on the percentage annual change in bank deposits, equity is equity capital, bank size, and bank income diversification level. Following this exercise, the differences in of both sets of coefficients are examined using the F-test. If different, one can argue that the difference can be due to the differential effects of either bank-level differences or country-level differences. To examine this issue, we re-estimate tha main model by controlling for the presence of fixed effects in the bank credit relationship and re-estimate the F-test. If the F test is significant, this implies that the differences in the magnitude of the relationshisp are due to country factors and not to bank-specific factors.\nFindings- Based on the estimated results, several interesting observations are noted. First, there are differences in the determinants of the annual change in bank credit between banks in Jordan and in Palestinian in terms of the signs of the independent variables and their values. Second, the significant differences in the determinants of the annual change in bank credit between banks in Jordan and in Palestinian are due to country-specific factors and not the bank-specific factors. Finally, given the differences in the political and economic environments in which banks in Jordan and Palestine operate, one should not be surprised of the main finding of this thesis.\nConclusion- It would be informative to examine the performance of both sets of banks in terms of other issue including the determinants of cost of intermediation, stability, bank discipline, and bank competition.\n\nKeywords: Jordan, Palestine, banks, credit growth, equity capital, seemingly-unrelated regression.\nJEL Codes: G20, G21, G24\n","PeriodicalId":517141,"journal":{"name":"Pressacademia","volume":"246 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determinants of bank credit in Jordan and Palestine: a comparative analysis\",\"authors\":\"Ruba Dirani, Mohammad Khataibeh, Ghassan Omet\",\"doi\":\"10.17261/pressacademia.2023.1856\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose- This paper analyzes the determinants of the annual changes in conventional banks’ credit in Jordan and Palestine. In addition, the paper examines whether the differences in the determinants of bank credit in both economies are due to country or bank-specific factors. As one might expect, the argument behind this paper rests on the fact that the Israeli occupation of Palestine makes the political and economic environments of the two countries very different.\\nMethodology- A panel of data of all thirteen (13) Jordanian conventional banks and 12 Palestinian conventional banks are used in the econometric analyses (2010 – 2021). For each set of banks, the annual percentage changes in credit are regresed on the percentage annual change in bank deposits, equity is equity capital, bank size, and bank income diversification level. Following this exercise, the differences in of both sets of coefficients are examined using the F-test. If different, one can argue that the difference can be due to the differential effects of either bank-level differences or country-level differences. To examine this issue, we re-estimate tha main model by controlling for the presence of fixed effects in the bank credit relationship and re-estimate the F-test. If the F test is significant, this implies that the differences in the magnitude of the relationshisp are due to country factors and not to bank-specific factors.\\nFindings- Based on the estimated results, several interesting observations are noted. First, there are differences in the determinants of the annual change in bank credit between banks in Jordan and in Palestinian in terms of the signs of the independent variables and their values. Second, the significant differences in the determinants of the annual change in bank credit between banks in Jordan and in Palestinian are due to country-specific factors and not the bank-specific factors. Finally, given the differences in the political and economic environments in which banks in Jordan and Palestine operate, one should not be surprised of the main finding of this thesis.\\nConclusion- It would be informative to examine the performance of both sets of banks in terms of other issue including the determinants of cost of intermediation, stability, bank discipline, and bank competition.\\n\\nKeywords: Jordan, Palestine, banks, credit growth, equity capital, seemingly-unrelated regression.\\nJEL Codes: G20, G21, G24\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":517141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pressacademia\",\"volume\":\"246 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pressacademia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17261/pressacademia.2023.1856\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pressacademia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17261/pressacademia.2023.1856","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文分析了约旦和巴勒斯坦常规银行信贷年度变化的决定因素。此外,本文还研究了这两个经济体银行信贷决定因素的差异是由国家因素还是银行特有因素造成的。正如人们所预料的那样,本文的论点是基于以色列对巴勒斯坦的占领使得两国的政治和经济环境大不相同这一事实。对于每一组银行,信贷的年度百分比变化与银行存款的年度百分比变化、股本、银行规模和银行收入多样化水平进行回归。之后,使用 F 检验法检验两组系数的差异。如果存在差异,则可以认为差异可能是由于银行层面的差异或国家层面的差异造成的。为了检验这个问题,我们通过控制银行信贷关系中固定效应的存在来重新估计主模型,并重新进行 F 检验。如果 F 检验是显著的,这就意味着这种关系大小的差异是由国家因素而非银行特定因素造成的。首先,约旦银行和巴勒斯坦银行的银行信贷年度变化的决定因素在自变量的符号和数值方面存在差异。其次,约旦银行和巴勒斯坦银行在银行信贷年度变化决定因素上的显著差异是由特定国家因素而非特定银行因素造成的。最后,鉴于约旦和巴勒斯坦银行所处的政治和经济环境不同,我们不应对本论文的主要结论感到惊讶。结论--从其他问题(包括中介成本的决定因素、稳定性、银行纪律和银行竞争)的角度来研究这两组银行的表现将会很有启发:约旦、巴勒斯坦、银行、信贷增长、股权资本、似非相关回归:G20, G21, G24
Determinants of bank credit in Jordan and Palestine: a comparative analysis
Purpose- This paper analyzes the determinants of the annual changes in conventional banks’ credit in Jordan and Palestine. In addition, the paper examines whether the differences in the determinants of bank credit in both economies are due to country or bank-specific factors. As one might expect, the argument behind this paper rests on the fact that the Israeli occupation of Palestine makes the political and economic environments of the two countries very different.
Methodology- A panel of data of all thirteen (13) Jordanian conventional banks and 12 Palestinian conventional banks are used in the econometric analyses (2010 – 2021). For each set of banks, the annual percentage changes in credit are regresed on the percentage annual change in bank deposits, equity is equity capital, bank size, and bank income diversification level. Following this exercise, the differences in of both sets of coefficients are examined using the F-test. If different, one can argue that the difference can be due to the differential effects of either bank-level differences or country-level differences. To examine this issue, we re-estimate tha main model by controlling for the presence of fixed effects in the bank credit relationship and re-estimate the F-test. If the F test is significant, this implies that the differences in the magnitude of the relationshisp are due to country factors and not to bank-specific factors.
Findings- Based on the estimated results, several interesting observations are noted. First, there are differences in the determinants of the annual change in bank credit between banks in Jordan and in Palestinian in terms of the signs of the independent variables and their values. Second, the significant differences in the determinants of the annual change in bank credit between banks in Jordan and in Palestinian are due to country-specific factors and not the bank-specific factors. Finally, given the differences in the political and economic environments in which banks in Jordan and Palestine operate, one should not be surprised of the main finding of this thesis.
Conclusion- It would be informative to examine the performance of both sets of banks in terms of other issue including the determinants of cost of intermediation, stability, bank discipline, and bank competition.
Keywords: Jordan, Palestine, banks, credit growth, equity capital, seemingly-unrelated regression.
JEL Codes: G20, G21, G24