{"title":"疫苗时代肯尼亚西部的宫颈癌预防工作","authors":"Hillary Mabeya","doi":"10.59692/jogeca.v36i1.289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a sexually transmitted virus found in virtually all cases ofcervical cancer that kills 275,000 women every year and is the biggest contributor to years of life lostfrom cancer among women in the developing world.Objectives: To determine barriers to HPV vaccination and cervical cancer prevention at the healthpersonnel level in low-resource settings. To evaluate the performance of cervical cancer secondaryprevention tools. To identify barriers and facilitators associated with the administration of the full HPVvaccination regimen.Methods: 150 HIV-infected women underwent conventional Papanicolaou (Pap) smear, visual inspectionwith acetic acid (VIA), colposcopy, and biopsy. Region under curve analysis was conducted to comparethe accuracies between VIA and Pap smear. 9600 doses of GARDASIL vaccines were administered togirls in Western Kenya targeting girls aged 9-14 years. A cross-sectional survey of health care providerswas also conducted.Results: VIA had a sensitivity of 69.6% (CI=55.1–81.0%), specificity of 51.0% (CI=41.5–60.4%), positivepredictive value (PPV) of 38.6% (CI=28.8–49.3%), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 79.1%(CI=67.8–87.2%). For conventional Pap smear, sensitivity was 52.5% (CI=42.1–71.5%), specificity 66.3%(CI=52.0–71.2%), PPV 39.7% (CI=27.6–51.8%), and NPV 76.8% (CI=67.0–85.6%). 1933 of 3026(63.8%) girls received a second HPV dose, whereas 1182 of 3026 (39.1%) received a third dose. 71.8%of girls had a female guardian and 28.1% had a male guardian. The median time lapse between the firstand third doses was 175 days (IQR: 168-182). High level of divergence between knowledge of HPVinfection and vaccines with a mean score of 2.27 indicating a negative attitude among health careworkers. 36.8% expressed concern that the HPV vaccine may result in promiscuity.Conclusions: Lack of proximity to vaccination centers requires an innovative vaccine delivery strategy.More education of caregivers undergoing cytological screening to raise awareness of the importance ofHPV vaccination.","PeriodicalId":517202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of Eastern and Central Africa","volume":"468 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cervical cancer prevention in Western Kenya in the vaccine era\",\"authors\":\"Hillary Mabeya\",\"doi\":\"10.59692/jogeca.v36i1.289\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a sexually transmitted virus found in virtually all cases ofcervical cancer that kills 275,000 women every year and is the biggest contributor to years of life lostfrom cancer among women in the developing world.Objectives: To determine barriers to HPV vaccination and cervical cancer prevention at the healthpersonnel level in low-resource settings. To evaluate the performance of cervical cancer secondaryprevention tools. To identify barriers and facilitators associated with the administration of the full HPVvaccination regimen.Methods: 150 HIV-infected women underwent conventional Papanicolaou (Pap) smear, visual inspectionwith acetic acid (VIA), colposcopy, and biopsy. Region under curve analysis was conducted to comparethe accuracies between VIA and Pap smear. 9600 doses of GARDASIL vaccines were administered togirls in Western Kenya targeting girls aged 9-14 years. A cross-sectional survey of health care providerswas also conducted.Results: VIA had a sensitivity of 69.6% (CI=55.1–81.0%), specificity of 51.0% (CI=41.5–60.4%), positivepredictive value (PPV) of 38.6% (CI=28.8–49.3%), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 79.1%(CI=67.8–87.2%). For conventional Pap smear, sensitivity was 52.5% (CI=42.1–71.5%), specificity 66.3%(CI=52.0–71.2%), PPV 39.7% (CI=27.6–51.8%), and NPV 76.8% (CI=67.0–85.6%). 1933 of 3026(63.8%) girls received a second HPV dose, whereas 1182 of 3026 (39.1%) received a third dose. 71.8%of girls had a female guardian and 28.1% had a male guardian. The median time lapse between the firstand third doses was 175 days (IQR: 168-182). High level of divergence between knowledge of HPVinfection and vaccines with a mean score of 2.27 indicating a negative attitude among health careworkers. 36.8% expressed concern that the HPV vaccine may result in promiscuity.Conclusions: Lack of proximity to vaccination centers requires an innovative vaccine delivery strategy.More education of caregivers undergoing cytological screening to raise awareness of the importance ofHPV vaccination.\",\"PeriodicalId\":517202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of Eastern and Central Africa\",\"volume\":\"468 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of Eastern and Central Africa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59692/jogeca.v36i1.289\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of Eastern and Central Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59692/jogeca.v36i1.289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cervical cancer prevention in Western Kenya in the vaccine era
Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a sexually transmitted virus found in virtually all cases ofcervical cancer that kills 275,000 women every year and is the biggest contributor to years of life lostfrom cancer among women in the developing world.Objectives: To determine barriers to HPV vaccination and cervical cancer prevention at the healthpersonnel level in low-resource settings. To evaluate the performance of cervical cancer secondaryprevention tools. To identify barriers and facilitators associated with the administration of the full HPVvaccination regimen.Methods: 150 HIV-infected women underwent conventional Papanicolaou (Pap) smear, visual inspectionwith acetic acid (VIA), colposcopy, and biopsy. Region under curve analysis was conducted to comparethe accuracies between VIA and Pap smear. 9600 doses of GARDASIL vaccines were administered togirls in Western Kenya targeting girls aged 9-14 years. A cross-sectional survey of health care providerswas also conducted.Results: VIA had a sensitivity of 69.6% (CI=55.1–81.0%), specificity of 51.0% (CI=41.5–60.4%), positivepredictive value (PPV) of 38.6% (CI=28.8–49.3%), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 79.1%(CI=67.8–87.2%). For conventional Pap smear, sensitivity was 52.5% (CI=42.1–71.5%), specificity 66.3%(CI=52.0–71.2%), PPV 39.7% (CI=27.6–51.8%), and NPV 76.8% (CI=67.0–85.6%). 1933 of 3026(63.8%) girls received a second HPV dose, whereas 1182 of 3026 (39.1%) received a third dose. 71.8%of girls had a female guardian and 28.1% had a male guardian. The median time lapse between the firstand third doses was 175 days (IQR: 168-182). High level of divergence between knowledge of HPVinfection and vaccines with a mean score of 2.27 indicating a negative attitude among health careworkers. 36.8% expressed concern that the HPV vaccine may result in promiscuity.Conclusions: Lack of proximity to vaccination centers requires an innovative vaccine delivery strategy.More education of caregivers undergoing cytological screening to raise awareness of the importance ofHPV vaccination.