叙述者的流动性有多大?观察古代、中世纪和文艺复兴时期的场景变化

Poetica Pub Date : 2024-02-02 DOI:10.30965/25890530-05434001
Thomas Kuhn-Treichel
{"title":"叙述者的流动性有多大?观察古代、中世纪和文艺复兴时期的场景变化","authors":"Thomas Kuhn-Treichel","doi":"10.30965/25890530-05434001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nIn a type of metalepsis common from antiquity to modern times, the narrator puts himself in direct contact with the narrated world by visualising the change of scene as a movement between two places or (groups of) characters. This article concentrates on the spatial aspect of this contact and investigates the question to what extent the narrator claims mobility in the narrated space. As the examples discussed show, there are striking differences between the epochs, which are significant for a historicised understanding of storytelling in general. While ancient (i.e., Greek and Latin) narrators sometimes transfer themselves to specific places, medieval vernacular scene shift formulae usually refer to characters, who are envisaged in a performative co-presence with the narrator and the addressees. This situation changes in the Italian Renaissance (Boccaccio, Ariosto), when narrators start to emphasise their mobility again, which they simultaneously enrich with new implications.","PeriodicalId":517184,"journal":{"name":"Poetica","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wie mobil ist der Erzähler? Beobachtungen zu metaleptischen Szenenwechseln in Antike, Mittelalter und Renaissance\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Kuhn-Treichel\",\"doi\":\"10.30965/25890530-05434001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nIn a type of metalepsis common from antiquity to modern times, the narrator puts himself in direct contact with the narrated world by visualising the change of scene as a movement between two places or (groups of) characters. This article concentrates on the spatial aspect of this contact and investigates the question to what extent the narrator claims mobility in the narrated space. As the examples discussed show, there are striking differences between the epochs, which are significant for a historicised understanding of storytelling in general. While ancient (i.e., Greek and Latin) narrators sometimes transfer themselves to specific places, medieval vernacular scene shift formulae usually refer to characters, who are envisaged in a performative co-presence with the narrator and the addressees. This situation changes in the Italian Renaissance (Boccaccio, Ariosto), when narrators start to emphasise their mobility again, which they simultaneously enrich with new implications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":517184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Poetica\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Poetica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30965/25890530-05434001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Poetica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30965/25890530-05434001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在一种从古代到现代都很常见的 "金属视角"(metalepsis)中,叙述者将场景的变化想象为两个地方或(一组)人物之间的移动,从而使自己与所叙述的世界直接接触。本文集中探讨这种接触的空间方面,并研究叙述者在多大程度上声称自己在叙述空间中具有流动性这一问题。正如所讨论的例子所示,不同时代之间存在着显著的差异,这对于从历史角度理解一般的故事讲述具有重要意义。古代(即希腊语和拉丁语)的叙事者有时会将自己转移到特定地点,而中世纪的白话场景转换公式通常指的是人物,他们与叙事者和被叙述者处于表演性的共同在场状态。到了意大利文艺复兴时期(薄伽丘、阿里奥斯托),这种情况发生了变化,叙述者开始再次强调自己的流动性,并同时赋予其新的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Wie mobil ist der Erzähler? Beobachtungen zu metaleptischen Szenenwechseln in Antike, Mittelalter und Renaissance
In a type of metalepsis common from antiquity to modern times, the narrator puts himself in direct contact with the narrated world by visualising the change of scene as a movement between two places or (groups of) characters. This article concentrates on the spatial aspect of this contact and investigates the question to what extent the narrator claims mobility in the narrated space. As the examples discussed show, there are striking differences between the epochs, which are significant for a historicised understanding of storytelling in general. While ancient (i.e., Greek and Latin) narrators sometimes transfer themselves to specific places, medieval vernacular scene shift formulae usually refer to characters, who are envisaged in a performative co-presence with the narrator and the addressees. This situation changes in the Italian Renaissance (Boccaccio, Ariosto), when narrators start to emphasise their mobility again, which they simultaneously enrich with new implications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Die Verflüssigung des Realismus Die praxis der Übersetzung Die Verflüssigung des Realismus Wie mobil ist der Erzähler? Beobachtungen zu metaleptischen Szenenwechseln in Antike, Mittelalter und Renaissance Poetik der Visualität
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1