人工神经网络、循环神经网络和长短期记忆在预测极端气候变化方面的性能比较

Nanda Try Luchia, Ena Tasia, Indah Ramadhani, Akhas Rahmadeyan, Raudiatul Zahra
{"title":"人工神经网络、循环神经网络和长短期记忆在预测极端气候变化方面的性能比较","authors":"Nanda Try Luchia, Ena Tasia, Indah Ramadhani, Akhas Rahmadeyan, Raudiatul Zahra","doi":"10.57152/predatecs.v1i2.864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Extreme climate change is the most common problem in Indonesia. Extreme climate change for months can cause various natural disasters. Therefore, it is necessary to make predictions about climate change that will occur in order to avoid the risk of future conflicts. This study uses the Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) and Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) algorithms by comparing the performance of the three using Mean Squared Error (MSE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) evaluations. The results of this study indicate that RNN is better at predicting temperature in Indonesia compared to ANN and LSTM. This is evidenced by the MAPE value generated by the RNN which is smaller than the ANN and LSTM, which is 1.852 %, the RMSE value is 1,870, and the MSE value is 3,497.","PeriodicalId":516904,"journal":{"name":"Public Research Journal of Engineering, Data Technology and Computer Science","volume":"4 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Comparison Between Artificial Neural Network, Recurrent Neural Network and Long Short-Term Memory for Prediction of Extreme Climate Change\",\"authors\":\"Nanda Try Luchia, Ena Tasia, Indah Ramadhani, Akhas Rahmadeyan, Raudiatul Zahra\",\"doi\":\"10.57152/predatecs.v1i2.864\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Extreme climate change is the most common problem in Indonesia. Extreme climate change for months can cause various natural disasters. Therefore, it is necessary to make predictions about climate change that will occur in order to avoid the risk of future conflicts. This study uses the Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) and Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) algorithms by comparing the performance of the three using Mean Squared Error (MSE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) evaluations. The results of this study indicate that RNN is better at predicting temperature in Indonesia compared to ANN and LSTM. This is evidenced by the MAPE value generated by the RNN which is smaller than the ANN and LSTM, which is 1.852 %, the RMSE value is 1,870, and the MSE value is 3,497.\",\"PeriodicalId\":516904,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Research Journal of Engineering, Data Technology and Computer Science\",\"volume\":\"4 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Research Journal of Engineering, Data Technology and Computer Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.57152/predatecs.v1i2.864\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Research Journal of Engineering, Data Technology and Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57152/predatecs.v1i2.864","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

极端气候变化是印度尼西亚最常见的问题。长达数月的极端气候变化会引发各种自然灾害。因此,有必要对即将发生的气候变化进行预测,以避免未来冲突的风险。本研究使用人工神经网络 (ANN)、循环神经网络 (RNN) 和长短期记忆 (LSTM) 算法,通过平均平方误差 (MSE)、均方根误差 (RMSE) 和平均绝对百分比误差 (MAPE) 评估来比较这三种算法的性能。研究结果表明,与 ANN 和 LSTM 相比,RNN 更擅长预测印度尼西亚的气温。RNN 产生的 MAPE 值(1.852 %)、RMSE 值(1,870)和 MSE 值(3,497)均小于 ANN 和 LSTM,证明了这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance Comparison Between Artificial Neural Network, Recurrent Neural Network and Long Short-Term Memory for Prediction of Extreme Climate Change
Extreme climate change is the most common problem in Indonesia. Extreme climate change for months can cause various natural disasters. Therefore, it is necessary to make predictions about climate change that will occur in order to avoid the risk of future conflicts. This study uses the Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) and Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) algorithms by comparing the performance of the three using Mean Squared Error (MSE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) evaluations. The results of this study indicate that RNN is better at predicting temperature in Indonesia compared to ANN and LSTM. This is evidenced by the MAPE value generated by the RNN which is smaller than the ANN and LSTM, which is 1.852 %, the RMSE value is 1,870, and the MSE value is 3,497.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Application of Recurrent Neural Network Bi-Long Short-Term Memory, Gated Recurrent Unit and Bi-Gated Recurrent Unit for Forecasting Rupiah Against Dollar (USD) Exchange Rate Application of The Fuzzy Mamdani Method in Determining KIP-Kuliah Recipients for New Students Classifications of Offline Shopping Trends and Patterns with Machine Learning Algorithms Classification of Diabetes Mellitus Sufferers Eating Patterns Using K-Nearest Neighbors, Naïve Bayes and Decission Tree Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Neural Network Models for Analyzing Customer Review Sentiments on Marketplace
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1