放射学出版物中的宣传用语:越来越多地使用 "优秀"、"良好"、"有前途"、"稳健 "和 "独特 "等词语。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Rofo-fortschritte Auf Dem Gebiet Der Rontgenstrahlen Und Der Bildgebenden Verfahren Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-19 DOI:10.1055/a-2224-9357
Thomas Christian Kwee, Robert Michael Kwee
{"title":"放射学出版物中的宣传用语:越来越多地使用 \"优秀\"、\"良好\"、\"有前途\"、\"稳健 \"和 \"独特 \"等词语。","authors":"Thomas Christian Kwee, Robert Michael Kwee","doi":"10.1055/a-2224-9357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong> To investigate if radiology researchers are increasingly promoting their scientific findings by more frequently using positive words in their publications.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong> This study included all articles that were published in 14 general radiology journals between 2003 and 2022. The title and abstract of each article were assessed for the presence of positive, negative, neutral, and random words, according to predefined sets of words for each category. Usage of positive, negative, neutral, and random words was calculated for each year and corrected for the total number of articles in each year. Temporal trends between 2002 and 2023 and the relationship between positive word usage and journal impact factor (IF) were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Positive word usage (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.895, P< 0.001) and neutral word usage (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.463, P = 0.005) showed significant upward temporal trends. Negative word usage and random word usage did not show any significant temporal trends. Five positive words showed significantly increased usage over time and were present in more than 1 % of titles/abstracts in at least one year: \"excellent\" (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.800, P< 0.001), \"favorable\" (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.547, P< 0.001), \"promising\" (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.607, P< 0.001), \"robust\" (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.737, P< 0.001), and \"unique\" (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.747, P< 0.001). There was no significant association between positive word usage and journal IF.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Radiology researchers appear to increasingly promote their scientific findings by more frequently using positive words in their publications over the past two decades.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>  · Positive word usage in titles/abstracts has strongly increased between 2003-2022. · \"Excellent\", \"favorable\", \"promising\", \"robust\", and \"unique\" were most often used. · This trend occurred in all general radiology journals, regardless of impact factor.</p><p><strong>Citation format: </strong>· Kwee T, Kwee R. Promotional language in radiology publications: increasing use of \"excellent\", \"favorable\", \"promising\", \"robust\", and \"unique\". Fortschr Röntgenstr 2024; 196: 945 - 955.</p>","PeriodicalId":21490,"journal":{"name":"Rofo-fortschritte Auf Dem Gebiet Der Rontgenstrahlen Und Der Bildgebenden Verfahren","volume":" ","pages":"945-955"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Promotional language in radiology publications: increasing use of \\\"excellent\\\", \\\"favorable\\\", \\\"promising\\\", \\\"robust\\\", and \\\"unique\\\".\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Christian Kwee, Robert Michael Kwee\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2224-9357\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong> To investigate if radiology researchers are increasingly promoting their scientific findings by more frequently using positive words in their publications.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong> This study included all articles that were published in 14 general radiology journals between 2003 and 2022. The title and abstract of each article were assessed for the presence of positive, negative, neutral, and random words, according to predefined sets of words for each category. Usage of positive, negative, neutral, and random words was calculated for each year and corrected for the total number of articles in each year. Temporal trends between 2002 and 2023 and the relationship between positive word usage and journal impact factor (IF) were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Positive word usage (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.895, P< 0.001) and neutral word usage (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.463, P = 0.005) showed significant upward temporal trends. Negative word usage and random word usage did not show any significant temporal trends. Five positive words showed significantly increased usage over time and were present in more than 1 % of titles/abstracts in at least one year: \\\"excellent\\\" (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.800, P< 0.001), \\\"favorable\\\" (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.547, P< 0.001), \\\"promising\\\" (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.607, P< 0.001), \\\"robust\\\" (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.737, P< 0.001), and \\\"unique\\\" (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.747, P< 0.001). There was no significant association between positive word usage and journal IF.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Radiology researchers appear to increasingly promote their scientific findings by more frequently using positive words in their publications over the past two decades.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>  · Positive word usage in titles/abstracts has strongly increased between 2003-2022. · \\\"Excellent\\\", \\\"favorable\\\", \\\"promising\\\", \\\"robust\\\", and \\\"unique\\\" were most often used. · This trend occurred in all general radiology journals, regardless of impact factor.</p><p><strong>Citation format: </strong>· Kwee T, Kwee R. Promotional language in radiology publications: increasing use of \\\"excellent\\\", \\\"favorable\\\", \\\"promising\\\", \\\"robust\\\", and \\\"unique\\\". Fortschr Röntgenstr 2024; 196: 945 - 955.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rofo-fortschritte Auf Dem Gebiet Der Rontgenstrahlen Und Der Bildgebenden Verfahren\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"945-955\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rofo-fortschritte Auf Dem Gebiet Der Rontgenstrahlen Und Der Bildgebenden Verfahren\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2224-9357\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rofo-fortschritte Auf Dem Gebiet Der Rontgenstrahlen Und Der Bildgebenden Verfahren","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2224-9357","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:调查放射学研究人员是否越来越多地在其出版物中使用褒义词来宣传其科研成果:本研究包括 2003 年至 2022 年间发表在 14 种普通放射学期刊上的所有文章。每篇文章的标题和摘要都根据预定义的词组进行了评估,以确定是否存在褒义词、贬义词、中性词和随机词。阳性词、阴性词、中性词和随机词的使用率按年计算,并根据每年的文章总数进行校正。评估了 2002 年至 2023 年间的时间趋势以及正面词语使用率与期刊影响因子(IF)之间的关系:积极用词(Mann-Kendall tau 为 0.895,PC 结论:放射学研究人员似乎越来越多地使用积极用词:在过去二十年中,放射学研究人员似乎越来越多地在他们的出版物中使用褒义词来宣传他们的科研成果:- 2003-2022 年间,标题/摘要中正面词汇的使用率大幅上升。- 其中,"优秀"、"有利"、"有前途"、"强大 "和 "独特 "的使用频率最高。- 这一趋势出现在所有普通放射学期刊中,与影响因子无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Promotional language in radiology publications: increasing use of "excellent", "favorable", "promising", "robust", and "unique".

Purpose:  To investigate if radiology researchers are increasingly promoting their scientific findings by more frequently using positive words in their publications.

Materials and methods:  This study included all articles that were published in 14 general radiology journals between 2003 and 2022. The title and abstract of each article were assessed for the presence of positive, negative, neutral, and random words, according to predefined sets of words for each category. Usage of positive, negative, neutral, and random words was calculated for each year and corrected for the total number of articles in each year. Temporal trends between 2002 and 2023 and the relationship between positive word usage and journal impact factor (IF) were assessed.

Results:  Positive word usage (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.895, P< 0.001) and neutral word usage (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.463, P = 0.005) showed significant upward temporal trends. Negative word usage and random word usage did not show any significant temporal trends. Five positive words showed significantly increased usage over time and were present in more than 1 % of titles/abstracts in at least one year: "excellent" (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.800, P< 0.001), "favorable" (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.547, P< 0.001), "promising" (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.607, P< 0.001), "robust" (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.737, P< 0.001), and "unique" (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.747, P< 0.001). There was no significant association between positive word usage and journal IF.

Conclusion:  Radiology researchers appear to increasingly promote their scientific findings by more frequently using positive words in their publications over the past two decades.

Key points:   · Positive word usage in titles/abstracts has strongly increased between 2003-2022. · "Excellent", "favorable", "promising", "robust", and "unique" were most often used. · This trend occurred in all general radiology journals, regardless of impact factor.

Citation format: · Kwee T, Kwee R. Promotional language in radiology publications: increasing use of "excellent", "favorable", "promising", "robust", and "unique". Fortschr Röntgenstr 2024; 196: 945 - 955.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
340
期刊介绍: Die RöFo veröffentlicht Originalarbeiten, Übersichtsartikel und Fallberichte aus dem Bereich der Radiologie und den weiteren bildgebenden Verfahren in der Medizin. Es dürfen nur Arbeiten eingereicht werden, die noch nicht veröffentlicht sind und die auch nicht gleichzeitig einer anderen Zeitschrift zur Veröffentlichung angeboten wurden. Alle eingereichten Beiträge unterliegen einer sorgfältigen fachlichen Begutachtung. Gegründet 1896 – nur knapp 1 Jahr nach der Entdeckung der Röntgenstrahlen durch C.W. Röntgen – blickt die RöFo auf über 100 Jahre Erfahrung als wichtigstes Publikationsmedium in der deutschsprachigen Radiologie zurück. Sie ist damit die älteste radiologische Fachzeitschrift und schafft es erfolgreich, lange Kontinuität mit dem Anspruch an wissenschaftliches Publizieren auf internationalem Niveau zu verbinden. Durch ihren zentralen Platz im Verlagsprogramm stellte die RöFo die Basis für das heute umfassende und erfolgreiche Radiologie-Medienangebot im Georg Thieme Verlag. Besonders eng verbunden ist die RöFo mit der Geschichte der Röntgengesellschaften in Deutschland und Österreich. Sie ist offizielles Organ von DRG und ÖRG und die Mitglieder der Fachgesellschaften erhalten die Zeitschrift im Rahmen ihrer Mitgliedschaft. Mit ihrem wissenschaftlichen Kernteil und dem eigenen Mitteilungsteil der Fachgesellschaften bietet die RöFo Monat für Monat ein Forum für den Austausch von Inhalten und Botschaften der radiologischen Community im deutschsprachigen Raum.
期刊最新文献
The worldwide COVID-19 pandemic caused a decline in sonographic examinations - is this a continuing trend? Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the liver: Vascular pathologies and interventions. The value of AI-based analysis of fractional flow reserve of volume computed tomographically detected coronary artery stenosis with regard to their hemodynamic relevance. [Intracranial and spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas]. 2-Hydroxyglutarate as an MR spectroscopic predictor of an IDH mutation in gliomas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1