大流行之前和期间的城市郊游空间使用情况:利用社交媒体帖子开展的韩国大田案例研究

IF 3.6 3区 管理学 Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism-Research Planning and Management Pub Date : 2024-02-19 DOI:10.1016/j.jort.2024.100740
Hyojin Baek
{"title":"大流行之前和期间的城市郊游空间使用情况:利用社交媒体帖子开展的韩国大田案例研究","authors":"Hyojin Baek","doi":"10.1016/j.jort.2024.100740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study aims to investigate the popularly visited places and their spatial characteristics during the pandemic. To achieve this objective, semantic network analysis (SNA) and GIS spatial analysis were conducted using place-based words collected from Instagram posts from 2018 to June 2021 with the hashtag ‘Daejeon Nadri.’ The findings indicate that during the pandemic, the eigenvector centrality of words related to city centers decreased significantly, while words related to suburban areas increased. Before the pandemic, there was approximately a 10 km distance from the central node to the farthest node in the same modularity class. However, during the pandemic, the visited places were limited to their neighboring areas in the same modularity class. This study found that visited places during the pandemic were predominantly located in suburban areas, particularly around stream and forest areas. Green areas situated in city centers did not show a significant increase in visits during the pandemic. This indicates that people tended to visit less crowded green areas in suburban areas and showed a tendency to visit nearby places during the pandemic. These changes suggest that suburban green areas are also crucial for cities, not just for green areas in cities. In planning for future epidemics, easy access to green areas is crucial. Such accessibility can be made by allocating small green areas, creating linear green belts to link main greens, and strengthening public transport links to suburban areas.</p></div><div><h3>Management implications</h3><p>The results of this study imply that individuals tend to prefer natural green spaces with low population density for their outings amid the COVID-19 crisis. This finding underscores the significance of green spaces that accommodate urban residents' leisure activities during specific circumstances such as epidemics. It is worth considering appropriate allocation of green spaces within the city to ensure equal access to public green in urban planning. Another challenge is to enhance the public transportation network to connect major green spaces in the outskirts and suburbs of the metropolitan region.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46931,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism-Research Planning and Management","volume":"45 ","pages":"Article 100740"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213078024000082/pdfft?md5=d71794717d25e93649370b22e200d8d3&pid=1-s2.0-S2213078024000082-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Urban space use for outing before and during the pandemic: A case study of Daejeon, South Korea using social media posts\",\"authors\":\"Hyojin Baek\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jort.2024.100740\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study aims to investigate the popularly visited places and their spatial characteristics during the pandemic. To achieve this objective, semantic network analysis (SNA) and GIS spatial analysis were conducted using place-based words collected from Instagram posts from 2018 to June 2021 with the hashtag ‘Daejeon Nadri.’ The findings indicate that during the pandemic, the eigenvector centrality of words related to city centers decreased significantly, while words related to suburban areas increased. Before the pandemic, there was approximately a 10 km distance from the central node to the farthest node in the same modularity class. However, during the pandemic, the visited places were limited to their neighboring areas in the same modularity class. This study found that visited places during the pandemic were predominantly located in suburban areas, particularly around stream and forest areas. Green areas situated in city centers did not show a significant increase in visits during the pandemic. This indicates that people tended to visit less crowded green areas in suburban areas and showed a tendency to visit nearby places during the pandemic. These changes suggest that suburban green areas are also crucial for cities, not just for green areas in cities. In planning for future epidemics, easy access to green areas is crucial. Such accessibility can be made by allocating small green areas, creating linear green belts to link main greens, and strengthening public transport links to suburban areas.</p></div><div><h3>Management implications</h3><p>The results of this study imply that individuals tend to prefer natural green spaces with low population density for their outings amid the COVID-19 crisis. This finding underscores the significance of green spaces that accommodate urban residents' leisure activities during specific circumstances such as epidemics. It is worth considering appropriate allocation of green spaces within the city to ensure equal access to public green in urban planning. Another challenge is to enhance the public transportation network to connect major green spaces in the outskirts and suburbs of the metropolitan region.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46931,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism-Research Planning and Management\",\"volume\":\"45 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100740\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213078024000082/pdfft?md5=d71794717d25e93649370b22e200d8d3&pid=1-s2.0-S2213078024000082-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism-Research Planning and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213078024000082\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism-Research Planning and Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213078024000082","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在调查大流行期间的热门访问地点及其空间特征。为实现这一目标,研究人员利用从 2018 年至 2021 年 6 月期间 Instagram 上以 "大田 Nadri "为标签的帖子中收集到的基于地点的词语,进行了语义网络分析(SNA)和 GIS 空间分析。研究结果表明,在大流行病期间,与市中心相关的词语的特征向量中心度显著下降,而与郊区相关的词语的特征向量中心度上升。大流行之前,在同一模块化等级中,从中心节点到最远节点的距离约为 10 公里。然而,在大流行期间,访问过的地方仅限于同一模块化等级中的邻近地区。本研究发现,大流行期间的受访地点主要位于郊区,尤其是溪流和林区周围。位于市中心的绿地在大流行期间的访问量并没有显著增加。这表明,在大流行期间,人们倾向于游览郊区人群较少的绿地,并表现出游览附近地方的趋势。这些变化表明,郊区绿地对城市也至关重要,而不仅仅是城市绿地。在规划未来的流行病时,方便地使用绿地至关重要。可以通过分配小型绿地、创建连接主要绿地的线性绿化带以及加强与郊区的公共交通连接来实现这种便利性。 本研究结果表明,在 COVID-19 危机期间,个人倾向于选择人口密度较低的自然绿地作为郊游场所。这一发现强调了在疫情等特殊情况下为城市居民休闲活动提供绿地的重要性。值得考虑的是在城市规划中适当分配城市绿地,以确保公共绿地的平等使用权。另一个挑战是加强公共交通网络,将大都市郊区的主要绿地连接起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Urban space use for outing before and during the pandemic: A case study of Daejeon, South Korea using social media posts

This study aims to investigate the popularly visited places and their spatial characteristics during the pandemic. To achieve this objective, semantic network analysis (SNA) and GIS spatial analysis were conducted using place-based words collected from Instagram posts from 2018 to June 2021 with the hashtag ‘Daejeon Nadri.’ The findings indicate that during the pandemic, the eigenvector centrality of words related to city centers decreased significantly, while words related to suburban areas increased. Before the pandemic, there was approximately a 10 km distance from the central node to the farthest node in the same modularity class. However, during the pandemic, the visited places were limited to their neighboring areas in the same modularity class. This study found that visited places during the pandemic were predominantly located in suburban areas, particularly around stream and forest areas. Green areas situated in city centers did not show a significant increase in visits during the pandemic. This indicates that people tended to visit less crowded green areas in suburban areas and showed a tendency to visit nearby places during the pandemic. These changes suggest that suburban green areas are also crucial for cities, not just for green areas in cities. In planning for future epidemics, easy access to green areas is crucial. Such accessibility can be made by allocating small green areas, creating linear green belts to link main greens, and strengthening public transport links to suburban areas.

Management implications

The results of this study imply that individuals tend to prefer natural green spaces with low population density for their outings amid the COVID-19 crisis. This finding underscores the significance of green spaces that accommodate urban residents' leisure activities during specific circumstances such as epidemics. It is worth considering appropriate allocation of green spaces within the city to ensure equal access to public green in urban planning. Another challenge is to enhance the public transportation network to connect major green spaces in the outskirts and suburbs of the metropolitan region.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism offers a dedicated outlet for research relevant to social sciences and natural resources. The journal publishes peer reviewed original research on all aspects of outdoor recreation planning and management, covering the entire spectrum of settings from wilderness to urban outdoor recreation opportunities. It also focuses on new products and findings in nature based tourism and park management. JORT is an interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary journal, articles may focus on any aspect of theory, method, or concept of outdoor recreation research, planning or management, and interdisciplinary work is especially welcome, and may be of a theoretical and/or a case study nature. Depending on the topic of investigation, articles may be positioned within one academic discipline, or draw from several disciplines in an integrative manner, with overarching relevance to social sciences and natural resources. JORT is international in scope and attracts scholars from all reaches of the world to facilitate the exchange of ideas. As such, the journal enhances understanding of scientific knowledge, empirical results, and practitioners'' needs. Therefore in JORT each article is accompanied by an executive summary, written by the editors or authors, highlighting the planning and management relevant aspects of the article.
期刊最新文献
Walking on sunshine: Application of a choice experiment to understand impacts of climate change on tourism attractions Towards a digital ranger: Using data from outdoor platforms to detect rule violations in protected areas and improve visitor management The influence of trekkers’ personal and subjective norms on their pro-environmental behaviors Environmental and social impacts of shifting park-use patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic: Insights from state and local park managers Usage and motives of urban river corridor: A case study at Hutuo River in Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1