Yen Wan Ngeow, Nik Intan Nik Ismail, Dayang Habibah Abang Ismawi Hassim, Siti Salina Sarkawi, Mahmud Iskandar Seth A. Rahim, Kok Chong Yong
{"title":"压缩成型和熔融沉积成型 3D 打印热塑性聚氨酯的比较评估","authors":"Yen Wan Ngeow, Nik Intan Nik Ismail, Dayang Habibah Abang Ismawi Hassim, Siti Salina Sarkawi, Mahmud Iskandar Seth A. Rahim, Kok Chong Yong","doi":"10.1007/s42464-024-00238-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Additive manufacturing, also known as 3D printing, is transforming the industry and becoming more common every day due to its considerable time saving and lower costs, compared to the established conventional manufacturing methods. The mechanical strength of 3D printed products is affected by the parameters of the 3D printing process. Thermoplastic Polyurethane (TPU) is a type of elastomer, capable of being used on any fused deposition modelling (FDM) 3D printer. A series of TPU test pieces with different infill density and patterns were produced using a FDM printer. The influence of infill parameters on the 3D part’s mechanical properties has been evaluated. Five patterns with a range of infill densities were compared in this study. The tensile properties of the printed specimens were influenced by the infill density, whereas the infill pattern used in this study has marginal effects. The grid pattern with 100% infill density showed the highest tensile strength, with a value of 4.43 MPa. The results were compared with specimens, which were prepared through conventional compression moulding. The dynamic mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA) and load–deflection analysis (LDA) tests showed that specimens with 100% infill density may not be significantly affected by different infill patterns selected in this study under low strain testing conditions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":662,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rubber Research","volume":"27 2","pages":"193 - 200"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative evaluation of compression moulded and fused deposition modelling 3D printed thermoplastic polyurethane\",\"authors\":\"Yen Wan Ngeow, Nik Intan Nik Ismail, Dayang Habibah Abang Ismawi Hassim, Siti Salina Sarkawi, Mahmud Iskandar Seth A. Rahim, Kok Chong Yong\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s42464-024-00238-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Additive manufacturing, also known as 3D printing, is transforming the industry and becoming more common every day due to its considerable time saving and lower costs, compared to the established conventional manufacturing methods. The mechanical strength of 3D printed products is affected by the parameters of the 3D printing process. Thermoplastic Polyurethane (TPU) is a type of elastomer, capable of being used on any fused deposition modelling (FDM) 3D printer. A series of TPU test pieces with different infill density and patterns were produced using a FDM printer. The influence of infill parameters on the 3D part’s mechanical properties has been evaluated. Five patterns with a range of infill densities were compared in this study. The tensile properties of the printed specimens were influenced by the infill density, whereas the infill pattern used in this study has marginal effects. The grid pattern with 100% infill density showed the highest tensile strength, with a value of 4.43 MPa. The results were compared with specimens, which were prepared through conventional compression moulding. The dynamic mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA) and load–deflection analysis (LDA) tests showed that specimens with 100% infill density may not be significantly affected by different infill patterns selected in this study under low strain testing conditions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rubber Research\",\"volume\":\"27 2\",\"pages\":\"193 - 200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rubber Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42464-024-00238-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"POLYMER SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rubber Research","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42464-024-00238-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLYMER SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
A comparative evaluation of compression moulded and fused deposition modelling 3D printed thermoplastic polyurethane
Additive manufacturing, also known as 3D printing, is transforming the industry and becoming more common every day due to its considerable time saving and lower costs, compared to the established conventional manufacturing methods. The mechanical strength of 3D printed products is affected by the parameters of the 3D printing process. Thermoplastic Polyurethane (TPU) is a type of elastomer, capable of being used on any fused deposition modelling (FDM) 3D printer. A series of TPU test pieces with different infill density and patterns were produced using a FDM printer. The influence of infill parameters on the 3D part’s mechanical properties has been evaluated. Five patterns with a range of infill densities were compared in this study. The tensile properties of the printed specimens were influenced by the infill density, whereas the infill pattern used in this study has marginal effects. The grid pattern with 100% infill density showed the highest tensile strength, with a value of 4.43 MPa. The results were compared with specimens, which were prepared through conventional compression moulding. The dynamic mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA) and load–deflection analysis (LDA) tests showed that specimens with 100% infill density may not be significantly affected by different infill patterns selected in this study under low strain testing conditions.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Rubber Research is devoted to both natural and synthetic rubbers, as well as to related disciplines. The scope of the journal encompasses all aspects of rubber from the core disciplines of biology, physics and chemistry, as well as economics. As a specialised field, rubber science includes within its niche a vast potential of innovative and value-added research areas yet to be explored. This peer reviewed publication focuses on the results of active experimental research and authoritative reviews on all aspects of rubber science.
The Journal of Rubber Research welcomes research on:
the upstream, including crop management, crop improvement and protection, and biotechnology;
the midstream, including processing and effluent management;
the downstream, including rubber engineering and product design, advanced rubber technology, latex science and technology, and chemistry and materials exploratory;
economics, including the economics of rubber production, consumption, and market analysis.
The Journal of Rubber Research serves to build a collective knowledge base while communicating information and validating the quality of research within the discipline, and bringing together work from experts in rubber science and related disciplines.
Scientists in both academia and industry involved in researching and working with all aspects of rubber will find this journal to be both source of information and a gateway for their own publications.