关于美国公众对基因检测的认识、了解和偏好的调查。

Personalized medicine Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-21 DOI:10.2217/pme-2023-0106
Shahariar Mohammed Fahim, Salisa C Westrick, Jingjing Qian, Surachat Ngorsuraches, Courtney S Watts Alexander, Kimberly Braxton Lloyd, Natalie S Hohmann
{"title":"关于美国公众对基因检测的认识、了解和偏好的调查。","authors":"Shahariar Mohammed Fahim, Salisa C Westrick, Jingjing Qian, Surachat Ngorsuraches, Courtney S Watts Alexander, Kimberly Braxton Lloyd, Natalie S Hohmann","doi":"10.2217/pme-2023-0106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> To understand awareness, knowledge and preferences regarding genetic testing among the USA general public. <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional online survey using a Qualtrics Panel. <b>Results:</b> Among 1600 respondents, 545 (34%) were White, 411 (26%) Black, 412 (26%) Hispanic or Latin(x) and 232 (15%) Asian. Most had heard of ancestry testing (87%) and genetic health risk testing (69%), but a third thought inherited genes were only a little or not at all responsible for obesity (36%) and mental health (33%). The majority preferred pre-emptive pharmacogenetic testing (n = 74%) compared with reactive testing. Statistically significant differences between racial/ethnic groups and rural-urban respondents were observed. <b>Conclusion:</b> Most preferred pre-emptive pharmacogenetic testing; however, about one-quarter preferred reactive testing. Preferences should be discussed during patient-clinician interactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":94167,"journal":{"name":"Personalized medicine","volume":" ","pages":"117-129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A survey on awareness, knowledge and preferences toward genetic testing among the United States general public.\",\"authors\":\"Shahariar Mohammed Fahim, Salisa C Westrick, Jingjing Qian, Surachat Ngorsuraches, Courtney S Watts Alexander, Kimberly Braxton Lloyd, Natalie S Hohmann\",\"doi\":\"10.2217/pme-2023-0106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> To understand awareness, knowledge and preferences regarding genetic testing among the USA general public. <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional online survey using a Qualtrics Panel. <b>Results:</b> Among 1600 respondents, 545 (34%) were White, 411 (26%) Black, 412 (26%) Hispanic or Latin(x) and 232 (15%) Asian. Most had heard of ancestry testing (87%) and genetic health risk testing (69%), but a third thought inherited genes were only a little or not at all responsible for obesity (36%) and mental health (33%). The majority preferred pre-emptive pharmacogenetic testing (n = 74%) compared with reactive testing. Statistically significant differences between racial/ethnic groups and rural-urban respondents were observed. <b>Conclusion:</b> Most preferred pre-emptive pharmacogenetic testing; however, about one-quarter preferred reactive testing. Preferences should be discussed during patient-clinician interactions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personalized medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"117-129\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personalized medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2217/pme-2023-0106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personalized medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2217/pme-2023-0106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:了解美国公众对基因检测的认识、知识和偏好。调查方法使用 Qualtrics 小组进行横断面在线调查。调查结果显示在 1600 名受访者中,545 人(34%)为白人,411 人(26%)为黑人,412 人(26%)为西班牙裔或拉丁裔,232 人(15%)为亚裔。大多数人听说过祖先检测(87%)和遗传健康风险检测(69%),但三分之一的人认为遗传基因只对肥胖(36%)和心理健康(33%)有一点影响或根本没有影响。与反应性检测相比,大多数人更倾向于先发制人的药物基因检测(n = 74%)。种族/民族群体和城乡受访者之间存在明显的统计学差异。结论:大多数人倾向于先期药物基因检测;然而,约四分之一的人倾向于反应性检测。在患者与医师互动时应讨论患者的偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A survey on awareness, knowledge and preferences toward genetic testing among the United States general public.

Aim: To understand awareness, knowledge and preferences regarding genetic testing among the USA general public. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey using a Qualtrics Panel. Results: Among 1600 respondents, 545 (34%) were White, 411 (26%) Black, 412 (26%) Hispanic or Latin(x) and 232 (15%) Asian. Most had heard of ancestry testing (87%) and genetic health risk testing (69%), but a third thought inherited genes were only a little or not at all responsible for obesity (36%) and mental health (33%). The majority preferred pre-emptive pharmacogenetic testing (n = 74%) compared with reactive testing. Statistically significant differences between racial/ethnic groups and rural-urban respondents were observed. Conclusion: Most preferred pre-emptive pharmacogenetic testing; however, about one-quarter preferred reactive testing. Preferences should be discussed during patient-clinician interactions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of trastuzumab deruxtecan in treating HER2-low breast cancer leptomeningeal metastasis: a case report. Lung cancer, platinum analog-based frontline treatment and pharmacogenetic limitations. The rs2275738 variant of the adiponectin receptor 1 gene is associated with biopsy-proven nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Introduction of a single-nucleotide variant, rs16851030, into the ADORA1 gene increased cellular susceptibility to hypoxia. A novel TGFβR2 splice variant in patient with aortic aneurysm and family history for aortic dissection: a case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1