光生物调节治疗口腔扁平苔藓的疗效与外用皮质类固醇激素的比较:系统综述、荟萃分析和基于 GRADE 的证据确定性评估

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jormas.2024.101798
{"title":"光生物调节治疗口腔扁平苔藓的疗效与外用皮质类固醇激素的比较:系统综述、荟萃分析和基于 GRADE 的证据确定性评估","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jormas.2024.101798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>There is an urgent need to update the evidence available on the efficacy of photobiomodulation (PBM) in comparison to topical corticosteroids<span> in the management of Oral Lichen Planus (OLP).</span></div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div><span>Cochrane Oral Health's Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE Pubmed, SCOPUS, Lilacs and Google Scholar were searched. Other sources included US National Institutes of Health Ongoing Trials Register, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and Clinical Trial Registry - India were searched using variations of the keywords “Laser” and “Oral Lichen Planus”. </span>Randomized controlled trials<span><span> comparing PBM and topical corticosteroids in the resolution of pain among OLP patients were included. The studies were assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias assessment tool. Publication bias was assessed using a </span>funnel plot, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated according to the GRADE guidelines.</span></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Ten studies were included for qualitative assessment and of these eight were included in the meta-analysis. The included studies used laser parameters of varying strengths and duration. Meta-analysis favoured PBM (<em>n</em><span><span> = 274, MD =-0.48, CI -0.66- -0.30) for pain score. No adverse effects were reported for </span>laser therapy. There was high heterogeneity and moderate certainty of evidence, and most studies had a high risk of bias.</span></div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There is improvement in the clinical parameters of OLP when treated with PBM in comparison to topical corticosteroids. However, the strength of the evidence for these findings in limited. It is recommended to conduct better long-term trials with large sample size.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55993,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"125 5","pages":"Article 101798"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of photobiomodulation in the management of oral Lichen Planus in comparison to topical corticosteroids: Systematic review, meta-analysis, and GRADE-based assessment of certainty of evidence\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jormas.2024.101798\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>There is an urgent need to update the evidence available on the efficacy of photobiomodulation (PBM) in comparison to topical corticosteroids<span> in the management of Oral Lichen Planus (OLP).</span></div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div><span>Cochrane Oral Health's Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE Pubmed, SCOPUS, Lilacs and Google Scholar were searched. Other sources included US National Institutes of Health Ongoing Trials Register, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and Clinical Trial Registry - India were searched using variations of the keywords “Laser” and “Oral Lichen Planus”. </span>Randomized controlled trials<span><span> comparing PBM and topical corticosteroids in the resolution of pain among OLP patients were included. The studies were assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias assessment tool. Publication bias was assessed using a </span>funnel plot, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated according to the GRADE guidelines.</span></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Ten studies were included for qualitative assessment and of these eight were included in the meta-analysis. The included studies used laser parameters of varying strengths and duration. Meta-analysis favoured PBM (<em>n</em><span><span> = 274, MD =-0.48, CI -0.66- -0.30) for pain score. No adverse effects were reported for </span>laser therapy. There was high heterogeneity and moderate certainty of evidence, and most studies had a high risk of bias.</span></div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There is improvement in the clinical parameters of OLP when treated with PBM in comparison to topical corticosteroids. However, the strength of the evidence for these findings in limited. It is recommended to conduct better long-term trials with large sample size.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\"125 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 101798\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468785524000405\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468785524000405","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景迫切需要更新光生物调控(PBM)与局部皮质类固醇治疗口腔扁平苔藓(OLP)疗效的现有证据。方法检索了Cochrane口腔健康试验登记册、Cochrane图书馆对照试验中央登记册、MEDLINE Pubmed、SCOPUS、Lilacs和谷歌学术。使用关键词 "激光 "和 "口腔扁平苔藓 "的变体搜索了其他来源,包括美国国立卫生研究院正在进行的试验登记、世界卫生组织国际临床试验登记平台和印度临床试验登记。纳入的随机对照试验比较了 PBM 和外用皮质类固醇激素在缓解 OLP 患者疼痛方面的作用。研究采用 Cochrane 偏倚风险评估工具进行评估。结果共纳入十项研究进行定性评估,其中八项纳入荟萃分析。纳入的研究使用了不同强度和持续时间的激光参数。荟萃分析结果显示,PBM(n = 274,MD =-0.48,CI -0.66--0.30)对疼痛评分更有利。激光疗法未出现不良反应。结论:与外用皮质类固醇激素相比,PBM疗法可改善OLP的临床参数。然而,这些研究结果的证据力度有限。建议进行样本量更大的长期试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of photobiomodulation in the management of oral Lichen Planus in comparison to topical corticosteroids: Systematic review, meta-analysis, and GRADE-based assessment of certainty of evidence

Background

There is an urgent need to update the evidence available on the efficacy of photobiomodulation (PBM) in comparison to topical corticosteroids in the management of Oral Lichen Planus (OLP).

Methods

Cochrane Oral Health's Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE Pubmed, SCOPUS, Lilacs and Google Scholar were searched. Other sources included US National Institutes of Health Ongoing Trials Register, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and Clinical Trial Registry - India were searched using variations of the keywords “Laser” and “Oral Lichen Planus”. Randomized controlled trials comparing PBM and topical corticosteroids in the resolution of pain among OLP patients were included. The studies were assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias assessment tool. Publication bias was assessed using a funnel plot, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated according to the GRADE guidelines.

Results

Ten studies were included for qualitative assessment and of these eight were included in the meta-analysis. The included studies used laser parameters of varying strengths and duration. Meta-analysis favoured PBM (n = 274, MD =-0.48, CI -0.66- -0.30) for pain score. No adverse effects were reported for laser therapy. There was high heterogeneity and moderate certainty of evidence, and most studies had a high risk of bias.

Conclusion

There is improvement in the clinical parameters of OLP when treated with PBM in comparison to topical corticosteroids. However, the strength of the evidence for these findings in limited. It is recommended to conduct better long-term trials with large sample size.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Surgery, Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Medicine, Otorhinolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
23 days
期刊最新文献
Editorial board Contents Is panoramic radiography adequate for diagnosing coronoid process hyperplasia? A case series Vascular complications with necrotic lesions following filler injections: Literature systematic review Traumatic ulcerative granuloma with stromal eosinophilia (TUGSE): Case report of a 63-year-old male patient with a rare self-healing oral mucosal lesion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1