{"title":"采用 SPME 和快速 GC-MS 作为火灾残骸法证应用的筛选方法","authors":"Briana A. Capistran","doi":"10.1016/j.forc.2024.100562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Analysis of ignitable liquids in fire debris samples can be a time-consuming process, from extraction of volatile compounds to instrumental analysis. Rapid gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC–MS) is a screening technique that can be utilized prior to confirmatory GC–MS analysis to provide an informative screening approach and possibly reduce the need to further analyze negative samples. Though rapid GC–MS is fast (less than two minutes), extraction techniques such as passive headspace extraction remain a bottleneck for decreasing overall workflow times. In this work, solid phase microextraction (SPME) was implemented with rapid GC–MS for ignitable liquid analysis for a faster, more sensitive screening approach compared to extraction with passive headspace. Using optimized inlet conditions, limits of detection as low as 27 ng/mL per compound were achieved. Gasoline and diesel fuel were extracted and analyzed, and major compounds in each liquid were identified in the resulting chromatograms. Extracted ion profiles (EIPs) and deconvolution methods were useful for additional compound identifications. Lastly, the SPME-rapid GC–MS workflow was extended to the analysis of gasoline and diesel fuel in mock burn samples using carpet and wood substrates. From SPME sample extraction to rapid GC–MS instrumental analysis and data processing, the total workflow for a single sample was reduced to under 20 min. These results indicate that SPME is a suitable injection technique for rapid GC–MS to provide a fast and sensitive screening approach for fire debris applications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":324,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Chemistry","volume":"38 ","pages":"Article 100562"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of SPME and rapid GC–MS as a screening approach for forensic fire debris applications\",\"authors\":\"Briana A. Capistran\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.forc.2024.100562\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Analysis of ignitable liquids in fire debris samples can be a time-consuming process, from extraction of volatile compounds to instrumental analysis. Rapid gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC–MS) is a screening technique that can be utilized prior to confirmatory GC–MS analysis to provide an informative screening approach and possibly reduce the need to further analyze negative samples. Though rapid GC–MS is fast (less than two minutes), extraction techniques such as passive headspace extraction remain a bottleneck for decreasing overall workflow times. In this work, solid phase microextraction (SPME) was implemented with rapid GC–MS for ignitable liquid analysis for a faster, more sensitive screening approach compared to extraction with passive headspace. Using optimized inlet conditions, limits of detection as low as 27 ng/mL per compound were achieved. Gasoline and diesel fuel were extracted and analyzed, and major compounds in each liquid were identified in the resulting chromatograms. Extracted ion profiles (EIPs) and deconvolution methods were useful for additional compound identifications. Lastly, the SPME-rapid GC–MS workflow was extended to the analysis of gasoline and diesel fuel in mock burn samples using carpet and wood substrates. From SPME sample extraction to rapid GC–MS instrumental analysis and data processing, the total workflow for a single sample was reduced to under 20 min. These results indicate that SPME is a suitable injection technique for rapid GC–MS to provide a fast and sensitive screening approach for fire debris applications.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forensic Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"38 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100562\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forensic Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468170924000146\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468170924000146","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Implementation of SPME and rapid GC–MS as a screening approach for forensic fire debris applications
Analysis of ignitable liquids in fire debris samples can be a time-consuming process, from extraction of volatile compounds to instrumental analysis. Rapid gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC–MS) is a screening technique that can be utilized prior to confirmatory GC–MS analysis to provide an informative screening approach and possibly reduce the need to further analyze negative samples. Though rapid GC–MS is fast (less than two minutes), extraction techniques such as passive headspace extraction remain a bottleneck for decreasing overall workflow times. In this work, solid phase microextraction (SPME) was implemented with rapid GC–MS for ignitable liquid analysis for a faster, more sensitive screening approach compared to extraction with passive headspace. Using optimized inlet conditions, limits of detection as low as 27 ng/mL per compound were achieved. Gasoline and diesel fuel were extracted and analyzed, and major compounds in each liquid were identified in the resulting chromatograms. Extracted ion profiles (EIPs) and deconvolution methods were useful for additional compound identifications. Lastly, the SPME-rapid GC–MS workflow was extended to the analysis of gasoline and diesel fuel in mock burn samples using carpet and wood substrates. From SPME sample extraction to rapid GC–MS instrumental analysis and data processing, the total workflow for a single sample was reduced to under 20 min. These results indicate that SPME is a suitable injection technique for rapid GC–MS to provide a fast and sensitive screening approach for fire debris applications.
期刊介绍:
Forensic Chemistry publishes high quality manuscripts focusing on the theory, research and application of any chemical science to forensic analysis. The scope of the journal includes fundamental advancements that result in a better understanding of the evidentiary significance derived from the physical and chemical analysis of materials. The scope of Forensic Chemistry will also include the application and or development of any molecular and atomic spectrochemical technique, electrochemical techniques, sensors, surface characterization techniques, mass spectrometry, nuclear magnetic resonance, chemometrics and statistics, and separation sciences (e.g. chromatography) that provide insight into the forensic analysis of materials. Evidential topics of interest to the journal include, but are not limited to, fingerprint analysis, drug analysis, ignitable liquid residue analysis, explosives detection and analysis, the characterization and comparison of trace evidence (glass, fibers, paints and polymers, tapes, soils and other materials), ink and paper analysis, gunshot residue analysis, synthetic pathways for drugs, toxicology and the analysis and chemistry associated with the components of fingermarks. The journal is particularly interested in receiving manuscripts that report advances in the forensic interpretation of chemical evidence. Technology Readiness Level: When submitting an article to Forensic Chemistry, all authors will be asked to self-assign a Technology Readiness Level (TRL) to their article. The purpose of the TRL system is to help readers understand the level of maturity of an idea or method, to help track the evolution of readiness of a given technique or method, and to help filter published articles by the expected ease of implementation in an operation setting within a crime lab.