采用 SPME 和快速 GC-MS 作为火灾残骸法证应用的筛选方法

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL Forensic Chemistry Pub Date : 2024-02-19 DOI:10.1016/j.forc.2024.100562
Briana A. Capistran
{"title":"采用 SPME 和快速 GC-MS 作为火灾残骸法证应用的筛选方法","authors":"Briana A. Capistran","doi":"10.1016/j.forc.2024.100562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Analysis of ignitable liquids in fire debris samples can be a time-consuming process, from extraction of volatile compounds to instrumental analysis. Rapid gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC–MS) is a screening technique that can be utilized prior to confirmatory GC–MS analysis to provide an informative screening approach and possibly reduce the need to further analyze negative samples. Though rapid GC–MS is fast (less than two minutes), extraction techniques such as passive headspace extraction remain a bottleneck for decreasing overall workflow times. In this work, solid phase microextraction (SPME) was implemented with rapid GC–MS for ignitable liquid analysis for a faster, more sensitive screening approach compared to extraction with passive headspace. Using optimized inlet conditions, limits of detection as low as 27 ng/mL per compound were achieved. Gasoline and diesel fuel were extracted and analyzed, and major compounds in each liquid were identified in the resulting chromatograms. Extracted ion profiles (EIPs) and deconvolution methods were useful for additional compound identifications. Lastly, the SPME-rapid GC–MS workflow was extended to the analysis of gasoline and diesel fuel in mock burn samples using carpet and wood substrates. From SPME sample extraction to rapid GC–MS instrumental analysis and data processing, the total workflow for a single sample was reduced to under 20 min. These results indicate that SPME is a suitable injection technique for rapid GC–MS to provide a fast and sensitive screening approach for fire debris applications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":324,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Chemistry","volume":"38 ","pages":"Article 100562"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of SPME and rapid GC–MS as a screening approach for forensic fire debris applications\",\"authors\":\"Briana A. Capistran\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.forc.2024.100562\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Analysis of ignitable liquids in fire debris samples can be a time-consuming process, from extraction of volatile compounds to instrumental analysis. Rapid gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC–MS) is a screening technique that can be utilized prior to confirmatory GC–MS analysis to provide an informative screening approach and possibly reduce the need to further analyze negative samples. Though rapid GC–MS is fast (less than two minutes), extraction techniques such as passive headspace extraction remain a bottleneck for decreasing overall workflow times. In this work, solid phase microextraction (SPME) was implemented with rapid GC–MS for ignitable liquid analysis for a faster, more sensitive screening approach compared to extraction with passive headspace. Using optimized inlet conditions, limits of detection as low as 27 ng/mL per compound were achieved. Gasoline and diesel fuel were extracted and analyzed, and major compounds in each liquid were identified in the resulting chromatograms. Extracted ion profiles (EIPs) and deconvolution methods were useful for additional compound identifications. Lastly, the SPME-rapid GC–MS workflow was extended to the analysis of gasoline and diesel fuel in mock burn samples using carpet and wood substrates. From SPME sample extraction to rapid GC–MS instrumental analysis and data processing, the total workflow for a single sample was reduced to under 20 min. These results indicate that SPME is a suitable injection technique for rapid GC–MS to provide a fast and sensitive screening approach for fire debris applications.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forensic Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"38 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100562\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forensic Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468170924000146\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468170924000146","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

分析火灾残骸样本中的可燃液体可能是一个耗时的过程,从提取挥发性化合物到仪器分析都是如此。快速气相色谱-质谱分析法(GC-MS)是一种筛选技术,可在确认性 GC-MS 分析之前使用,提供一种信息丰富的筛选方法,并可能减少进一步分析阴性样本的需要。虽然快速气相色谱-质谱分析速度很快(不到两分钟),但被动顶空萃取等萃取技术仍是缩短整体工作流程时间的瓶颈。在这项工作中,固相微萃取(SPME)与快速气相色谱-质谱联用,用于可燃液体分析,与被动顶空萃取相比,这种筛选方法更快、更灵敏。利用优化的进样条件,每种化合物的检测限低至 27 纳克/毫升。对汽油和柴油进行了萃取和分析,并从生成的色谱图中确定了每种液体中的主要化合物。萃取离子图谱 (EIP) 和解卷积方法有助于进一步鉴定化合物。最后,SPME-快速 GC-MS 工作流程被扩展到使用地毯和木材基质对模拟燃烧样本中的汽油和柴油进行分析。从 SPME 样品提取到快速 GC-MS 仪器分析和数据处理,单个样品的总工作流程缩短至 20 分钟以内。这些结果表明,SPME 是一种适用于快速 GC-MS 的进样技术,可为火灾残骸应用提供快速、灵敏的筛选方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Implementation of SPME and rapid GC–MS as a screening approach for forensic fire debris applications

Analysis of ignitable liquids in fire debris samples can be a time-consuming process, from extraction of volatile compounds to instrumental analysis. Rapid gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC–MS) is a screening technique that can be utilized prior to confirmatory GC–MS analysis to provide an informative screening approach and possibly reduce the need to further analyze negative samples. Though rapid GC–MS is fast (less than two minutes), extraction techniques such as passive headspace extraction remain a bottleneck for decreasing overall workflow times. In this work, solid phase microextraction (SPME) was implemented with rapid GC–MS for ignitable liquid analysis for a faster, more sensitive screening approach compared to extraction with passive headspace. Using optimized inlet conditions, limits of detection as low as 27 ng/mL per compound were achieved. Gasoline and diesel fuel were extracted and analyzed, and major compounds in each liquid were identified in the resulting chromatograms. Extracted ion profiles (EIPs) and deconvolution methods were useful for additional compound identifications. Lastly, the SPME-rapid GC–MS workflow was extended to the analysis of gasoline and diesel fuel in mock burn samples using carpet and wood substrates. From SPME sample extraction to rapid GC–MS instrumental analysis and data processing, the total workflow for a single sample was reduced to under 20 min. These results indicate that SPME is a suitable injection technique for rapid GC–MS to provide a fast and sensitive screening approach for fire debris applications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forensic Chemistry
Forensic Chemistry CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
14.80%
发文量
65
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Forensic Chemistry publishes high quality manuscripts focusing on the theory, research and application of any chemical science to forensic analysis. The scope of the journal includes fundamental advancements that result in a better understanding of the evidentiary significance derived from the physical and chemical analysis of materials. The scope of Forensic Chemistry will also include the application and or development of any molecular and atomic spectrochemical technique, electrochemical techniques, sensors, surface characterization techniques, mass spectrometry, nuclear magnetic resonance, chemometrics and statistics, and separation sciences (e.g. chromatography) that provide insight into the forensic analysis of materials. Evidential topics of interest to the journal include, but are not limited to, fingerprint analysis, drug analysis, ignitable liquid residue analysis, explosives detection and analysis, the characterization and comparison of trace evidence (glass, fibers, paints and polymers, tapes, soils and other materials), ink and paper analysis, gunshot residue analysis, synthetic pathways for drugs, toxicology and the analysis and chemistry associated with the components of fingermarks. The journal is particularly interested in receiving manuscripts that report advances in the forensic interpretation of chemical evidence. Technology Readiness Level: When submitting an article to Forensic Chemistry, all authors will be asked to self-assign a Technology Readiness Level (TRL) to their article. The purpose of the TRL system is to help readers understand the level of maturity of an idea or method, to help track the evolution of readiness of a given technique or method, and to help filter published articles by the expected ease of implementation in an operation setting within a crime lab.
期刊最新文献
Development and evaluation of a nontargeted electrochemical surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (EC-SERS) screening method applied to forensic seized drug casework samples Observation of chromatographic differences by non-specialist viewers for one-dimensional gas chromatography and comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography output Assessment of two benzylation strategies for the analysis of nerve-agent derived ethyl- and pinacolyl methyl phosphonic acids in sandy loam soil by GC–MS Portable near-infrared detection to replace color tests in an analytical scheme for forensic drug identification Halogen-bond mediated charge transfer for visual competitive colorimetric detection of fentanyl
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1