{"title":"通过 XPS 准确测量 HfO2 超薄薄膜厚度所必需的参考强度比的实验测定","authors":"Lulu Zhang, Yasushi Azuma, Akira Kurokawa, Hiroyuki Matsuzaki","doi":"10.1002/sia.7293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When measuring the thickness of ultrathin overlayer films using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), accurate values of the reference intensity ratio (<i>R</i><sub>0</sub>) and the effective attenuation length (<i>L</i>) are essential. By definition, <i>R</i><sub>0</sub> is the peak intensity ratio for an overlayer and the substrate in “bulk” phases. Two issues need to be addressed in experimental determining <i>R</i><sub>0</sub> for ultrathin films: (i) How might a contamination layer on the sample used for measuring peak intensities impact <i>R</i><sub>0</sub>? And (ii) do differences in the structure or chemistry of an ultrathin film make it inappropriate to determine <i>R</i><sub>0</sub> using bulk forms of the overlayer? In this study, we demonstrate the experimental determination of the <i>R</i><sub>0</sub> for an ultrathin HfO<sub>2</sub> film on a Si(100) substrate with a 2 nm SiO<sub>2</sub> layer. The values of <i>R</i><sub>0</sub> were determined using (i) the bulk materials of the HfO<sub>2</sub> film and substrate and (ii) the ultrathin HfO<sub>2</sub> films after different cleaning treatments. The results show that the <i>R</i><sub>0</sub> determined by the ultrathin films is higher than that determined by the bulk materials. Also, keeping the same level of carbonaceous contamination on the sample surface by cleaning as much as possible is essential for an accurate experimental determination of <i>R</i><sub>0</sub>. In addition, the effective attenuation length was obtained using samples with known thicknesses measured by X-ray reflectometry. The thicknesses and uncertainty budget of the ultrathin HfO<sub>2</sub> films were then evaluated.","PeriodicalId":22062,"journal":{"name":"Surface and Interface Analysis","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental determination of reference intensity ratio essential for accurate thickness measurement of HfO2 ultrathin films by XPS\",\"authors\":\"Lulu Zhang, Yasushi Azuma, Akira Kurokawa, Hiroyuki Matsuzaki\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/sia.7293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When measuring the thickness of ultrathin overlayer films using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), accurate values of the reference intensity ratio (<i>R</i><sub>0</sub>) and the effective attenuation length (<i>L</i>) are essential. By definition, <i>R</i><sub>0</sub> is the peak intensity ratio for an overlayer and the substrate in “bulk” phases. Two issues need to be addressed in experimental determining <i>R</i><sub>0</sub> for ultrathin films: (i) How might a contamination layer on the sample used for measuring peak intensities impact <i>R</i><sub>0</sub>? And (ii) do differences in the structure or chemistry of an ultrathin film make it inappropriate to determine <i>R</i><sub>0</sub> using bulk forms of the overlayer? In this study, we demonstrate the experimental determination of the <i>R</i><sub>0</sub> for an ultrathin HfO<sub>2</sub> film on a Si(100) substrate with a 2 nm SiO<sub>2</sub> layer. The values of <i>R</i><sub>0</sub> were determined using (i) the bulk materials of the HfO<sub>2</sub> film and substrate and (ii) the ultrathin HfO<sub>2</sub> films after different cleaning treatments. The results show that the <i>R</i><sub>0</sub> determined by the ultrathin films is higher than that determined by the bulk materials. Also, keeping the same level of carbonaceous contamination on the sample surface by cleaning as much as possible is essential for an accurate experimental determination of <i>R</i><sub>0</sub>. In addition, the effective attenuation length was obtained using samples with known thicknesses measured by X-ray reflectometry. The thicknesses and uncertainty budget of the ultrathin HfO<sub>2</sub> films were then evaluated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surface and Interface Analysis\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surface and Interface Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.7293\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surface and Interface Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.7293","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Experimental determination of reference intensity ratio essential for accurate thickness measurement of HfO2 ultrathin films by XPS
When measuring the thickness of ultrathin overlayer films using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), accurate values of the reference intensity ratio (R0) and the effective attenuation length (L) are essential. By definition, R0 is the peak intensity ratio for an overlayer and the substrate in “bulk” phases. Two issues need to be addressed in experimental determining R0 for ultrathin films: (i) How might a contamination layer on the sample used for measuring peak intensities impact R0? And (ii) do differences in the structure or chemistry of an ultrathin film make it inappropriate to determine R0 using bulk forms of the overlayer? In this study, we demonstrate the experimental determination of the R0 for an ultrathin HfO2 film on a Si(100) substrate with a 2 nm SiO2 layer. The values of R0 were determined using (i) the bulk materials of the HfO2 film and substrate and (ii) the ultrathin HfO2 films after different cleaning treatments. The results show that the R0 determined by the ultrathin films is higher than that determined by the bulk materials. Also, keeping the same level of carbonaceous contamination on the sample surface by cleaning as much as possible is essential for an accurate experimental determination of R0. In addition, the effective attenuation length was obtained using samples with known thicknesses measured by X-ray reflectometry. The thicknesses and uncertainty budget of the ultrathin HfO2 films were then evaluated.
期刊介绍:
Surface and Interface Analysis is devoted to the publication of papers dealing with the development and application of techniques for the characterization of surfaces, interfaces and thin films. Papers dealing with standardization and quantification are particularly welcome, and also those which deal with the application of these techniques to industrial problems. Papers dealing with the purely theoretical aspects of the technique will also be considered. Review articles will be published; prior consultation with one of the Editors is advised in these cases. Papers must clearly be of scientific value in the field and will be submitted to two independent referees. Contributions must be in English and must not have been published elsewhere, and authors must agree not to communicate the same material for publication to any other journal. Authors are invited to submit their papers for publication to John Watts (UK only), Jose Sanz (Rest of Europe), John T. Grant (all non-European countries, except Japan) or R. Shimizu (Japan only).