哪个是女巫?解构外汇市场活动

IF 5.5 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Global Finance Journal Pub Date : 2024-02-10 DOI:10.1016/j.gfj.2024.100947
Alexei G. Orlov, Rajiv Sharma
{"title":"哪个是女巫?解构外汇市场活动","authors":"Alexei G. Orlov,&nbsp;Rajiv Sharma","doi":"10.1016/j.gfj.2024.100947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Using regulatory data on transactions and positions, we provide a comprehensive overview of the activity in the foreign exchange (FX) derivatives markets, including futures, swaps, and options, covering exchange-traded and over-the-counter (OTC) products. The heretofore publicly unavailable statistics trace the behavior of dealers, hedge funds, asset managers, pension funds, insurance companies, and sovereign and supranational institutions before, during, and in the aftermath of the market stress of March 2020. We show that when the COVID market shock sharply increased the demand for the US dollar (USD), certain client sectors (e.g., hedge funds and sovereigns), along with dealers, provided USD liquidity by significantly increasing their long-USD swap positions. We find that client sectors are heterogeneous with respect to their liquidity needs and that their aggregate positions are small compared to dealer inventories. In addition to the inter-sector heterogeneity, we highlight the heterogeneity of firms within a client sector by focusing on hedge funds' USD/Euro swap positions—the most active client sector and currency pair in our data. Conversely, the FX dealers follow similar strategies, are competitive, and engage in multilateral netting arrangements to significantly reduce their risk exposure. Finally, using a sample of hedge funds that simultaneously participated in swaps and futures markets, we present evidence on trading volumes and frequencies that suggests that the OTC market is the preferred space for FX risk transfer, whereas the exchange-traded derivatives market serves the price discovery and immediacy functions for smaller trades.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46907,"journal":{"name":"Global Finance Journal","volume":"60 ","pages":"Article 100947"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Which witch is which? Deconstructing the foreign exchange markets activity\",\"authors\":\"Alexei G. Orlov,&nbsp;Rajiv Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gfj.2024.100947\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Using regulatory data on transactions and positions, we provide a comprehensive overview of the activity in the foreign exchange (FX) derivatives markets, including futures, swaps, and options, covering exchange-traded and over-the-counter (OTC) products. The heretofore publicly unavailable statistics trace the behavior of dealers, hedge funds, asset managers, pension funds, insurance companies, and sovereign and supranational institutions before, during, and in the aftermath of the market stress of March 2020. We show that when the COVID market shock sharply increased the demand for the US dollar (USD), certain client sectors (e.g., hedge funds and sovereigns), along with dealers, provided USD liquidity by significantly increasing their long-USD swap positions. We find that client sectors are heterogeneous with respect to their liquidity needs and that their aggregate positions are small compared to dealer inventories. In addition to the inter-sector heterogeneity, we highlight the heterogeneity of firms within a client sector by focusing on hedge funds' USD/Euro swap positions—the most active client sector and currency pair in our data. Conversely, the FX dealers follow similar strategies, are competitive, and engage in multilateral netting arrangements to significantly reduce their risk exposure. Finally, using a sample of hedge funds that simultaneously participated in swaps and futures markets, we present evidence on trading volumes and frequencies that suggests that the OTC market is the preferred space for FX risk transfer, whereas the exchange-traded derivatives market serves the price discovery and immediacy functions for smaller trades.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46907,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Finance Journal\",\"volume\":\"60 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100947\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Finance Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S104402832400019X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Finance Journal","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S104402832400019X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用交易和头寸的监管数据,我们全面概述了外汇衍生品市场的活动,包括期货、掉期和期权,涵盖交易所交易和场外交易(OTC)产品。这些迄今为止尚未公开的统计数据追踪了交易商、对冲基金、资产管理公司、养老基金、保险公司以及主权和超国家机构在 2020 年 3 月市场压力之前、期间和之后的行为。我们发现,当 COVID 市场冲击急剧增加对美元的需求时,某些客户部门(如对冲基金和主权国家)与交易商一起,通过大幅增加美元多头掉期头寸来提供美元流动性。我们发现,客户部门对流动性的需求各不相同,而且与交易商的库存相比,客户部门的总持仓规模较小。除了行业间的异质性,我们还通过关注对冲基金的美元/欧元掉期头寸--我们数据中最活跃的客户行业和货币对--来强调客户行业内企业的异质性。相反,外汇交易商遵循相似的策略,具有竞争力,并参与多边净额结算安排,以大幅降低风险敞口。最后,利用同时参与掉期和期货市场的对冲基金样本,我们提出了有关交易量和频率的证据,表明场外交易市场是外汇风险转移的首选空间,而交易所交易的衍生品市场则为较小规模的交易提供价格发现和即时性功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Which witch is which? Deconstructing the foreign exchange markets activity

Using regulatory data on transactions and positions, we provide a comprehensive overview of the activity in the foreign exchange (FX) derivatives markets, including futures, swaps, and options, covering exchange-traded and over-the-counter (OTC) products. The heretofore publicly unavailable statistics trace the behavior of dealers, hedge funds, asset managers, pension funds, insurance companies, and sovereign and supranational institutions before, during, and in the aftermath of the market stress of March 2020. We show that when the COVID market shock sharply increased the demand for the US dollar (USD), certain client sectors (e.g., hedge funds and sovereigns), along with dealers, provided USD liquidity by significantly increasing their long-USD swap positions. We find that client sectors are heterogeneous with respect to their liquidity needs and that their aggregate positions are small compared to dealer inventories. In addition to the inter-sector heterogeneity, we highlight the heterogeneity of firms within a client sector by focusing on hedge funds' USD/Euro swap positions—the most active client sector and currency pair in our data. Conversely, the FX dealers follow similar strategies, are competitive, and engage in multilateral netting arrangements to significantly reduce their risk exposure. Finally, using a sample of hedge funds that simultaneously participated in swaps and futures markets, we present evidence on trading volumes and frequencies that suggests that the OTC market is the preferred space for FX risk transfer, whereas the exchange-traded derivatives market serves the price discovery and immediacy functions for smaller trades.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Finance Journal
Global Finance Journal BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
13.50%
发文量
106
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Global Finance Journal provides a forum for the exchange of ideas and techniques among academicians and practitioners and, thereby, advances applied research in global financial management. Global Finance Journal publishes original, creative, scholarly research that integrates theory and practice and addresses a readership in both business and academia. Articles reflecting pragmatic research are sought in areas such as financial management, investment, banking and financial services, accounting, and taxation. Global Finance Journal welcomes contributions from scholars in both the business and academic community and encourages collaborative research from this broad base worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Pyramidal structure, vertical interlock, and corporate innovation Inhabiting influence of digital finance on stock price synchronicity Business group heterogeneity and firm outcomes: Evidence from Korean chaebols Under the microscope: Trade initiation activities around earnings and takeover announcements in a market with continuous disclosure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1