玻利维亚安第斯山脉饮用水中砷、锂和硼对人体的遗传毒性--一项横断面研究。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis Pub Date : 2024-02-22 DOI:10.1002/em.22587
Noemi Tirado, Josué Mamani, Jessica De Loma, Franz Ascui, Karin Broberg, Jacques Gardon
{"title":"玻利维亚安第斯山脉饮用水中砷、锂和硼对人体的遗传毒性--一项横断面研究。","authors":"Noemi Tirado,&nbsp;Josué Mamani,&nbsp;Jessica De Loma,&nbsp;Franz Ascui,&nbsp;Karin Broberg,&nbsp;Jacques Gardon","doi":"10.1002/em.22587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Elevated concentrations of arsenic, lithium and boron in drinking water have already been reported in Bolivia. Arsenic is known to cause genotoxicity but that caused by lithium and boron is less well known. The aim of the present cross-sectional study was to evaluate potential genotoxic effects of exposure to arsenic, while considering exposure to lithium and boron and genetic susceptibility. Women (<i>n</i> = 230) were recruited in villages located around Lake Poopó. Exposure to arsenic was determined as the sum of concentrations of arsenic metabolites inorganic arsenic, monomethylarsonic acid (MMA), and dimethylarsinic acid (DMA) in urine. Exposure to lithium and boron was determined based on their concentrations in urine. Genetic susceptibility was determined by <i>GSTM1</i> (glutathione S-transferase-mu-1) and <i>GSTT1</i> (glutathione S-transferase-theta-1) null genotypes and <i>AS3MT</i> (Arsenite Methyltransferase) rs3740393. Genotoxicity was measured in peripheral blood leukocytes using the comet assay. The geometric means of arsenic, lithium, and boron concentrations were 68, 897, and 3972 μg/L, respectively. <i>GSTM1</i> and <i>GSTT1</i> null carriers had more DNA strand breaks than gene carriers (<i>p</i> = .008, <i>p</i> = .005). We found no correlation between urinary arsenic and DNA strand breaks (<i>r</i><sub>S</sub> = .03, <i>p</i> = .64), and only a weak non-significant positive association in the adjusted multivariate analysis (β = .09 [−.03; .22], <i>p</i> = .14). Surprisingly, increasing concentrations of lithium in urine were negatively correlated with DNA strand breaks (<i>r</i><sub>S</sub> = −.24, <i>p</i> = .0006), and the association persisted in multivariate analysis after adjusting for arsenic (β = −.22 [−.36; −.08], <i>p</i> = .003). We found no association between boron and DNA strand breaks. The apparent protective effect of lithium merits further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11791,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis","volume":"65 3-4","pages":"121-128"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/em.22587","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genotoxicity in humans exposed to arsenic, lithium, and boron in drinking water in the Bolivian Andes—A cross sectional study\",\"authors\":\"Noemi Tirado,&nbsp;Josué Mamani,&nbsp;Jessica De Loma,&nbsp;Franz Ascui,&nbsp;Karin Broberg,&nbsp;Jacques Gardon\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/em.22587\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Elevated concentrations of arsenic, lithium and boron in drinking water have already been reported in Bolivia. Arsenic is known to cause genotoxicity but that caused by lithium and boron is less well known. The aim of the present cross-sectional study was to evaluate potential genotoxic effects of exposure to arsenic, while considering exposure to lithium and boron and genetic susceptibility. Women (<i>n</i> = 230) were recruited in villages located around Lake Poopó. Exposure to arsenic was determined as the sum of concentrations of arsenic metabolites inorganic arsenic, monomethylarsonic acid (MMA), and dimethylarsinic acid (DMA) in urine. Exposure to lithium and boron was determined based on their concentrations in urine. Genetic susceptibility was determined by <i>GSTM1</i> (glutathione S-transferase-mu-1) and <i>GSTT1</i> (glutathione S-transferase-theta-1) null genotypes and <i>AS3MT</i> (Arsenite Methyltransferase) rs3740393. Genotoxicity was measured in peripheral blood leukocytes using the comet assay. The geometric means of arsenic, lithium, and boron concentrations were 68, 897, and 3972 μg/L, respectively. <i>GSTM1</i> and <i>GSTT1</i> null carriers had more DNA strand breaks than gene carriers (<i>p</i> = .008, <i>p</i> = .005). We found no correlation between urinary arsenic and DNA strand breaks (<i>r</i><sub>S</sub> = .03, <i>p</i> = .64), and only a weak non-significant positive association in the adjusted multivariate analysis (β = .09 [−.03; .22], <i>p</i> = .14). Surprisingly, increasing concentrations of lithium in urine were negatively correlated with DNA strand breaks (<i>r</i><sub>S</sub> = −.24, <i>p</i> = .0006), and the association persisted in multivariate analysis after adjusting for arsenic (β = −.22 [−.36; −.08], <i>p</i> = .003). We found no association between boron and DNA strand breaks. The apparent protective effect of lithium merits further investigation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11791,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis\",\"volume\":\"65 3-4\",\"pages\":\"121-128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/em.22587\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/em.22587\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/em.22587","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

玻利维亚已经报告了饮用水中砷、锂和硼浓度升高的情况。众所周知,砷会造成基因毒性,但锂和硼造成的基因毒性却鲜为人知。本横断面研究旨在评估接触砷可能造成的遗传毒性影响,同时考虑接触锂和硼以及遗传易感性。研究人员在波波湖周围的村庄招募妇女(n = 230)。砷暴露量根据尿液中砷代谢物无机砷、单甲基胂酸(MMA)和二甲基胂酸(DMA)的浓度总和确定。锂和硼的暴露量根据尿液中的浓度确定。遗传易感性通过 GSTM1(谷胱甘肽 S-转移酶-mu-1)和 GSTT1(谷胱甘肽 S-转移酶-ta-1)空基因型以及 AS3MT(亚砷酸甲基转移酶)rs3740393 来确定。使用彗星试验测量了外周血白细胞的遗传毒性。砷、锂和硼浓度的几何平均数分别为 68、897 和 3972 微克/升。GSTM1 和 GSTT1 基因缺失携带者比基因携带者有更多的 DNA 链断裂(p = .008, p = .005)。我们发现,尿砷与 DNA 链断裂之间没有相关性(rS = .03,p = .64),在调整后的多变量分析中也只有微弱的非显著正相关性(β = .09 [-.03; .22],p = .14)。令人惊讶的是,尿液中锂浓度的增加与 DNA 链断裂呈负相关(rS = -.24,p = .0006),在对砷进行调整后,这种关联在多变量分析中依然存在(β = -.22 [-.36; -.08], p = .003)。我们没有发现硼与 DNA 链断裂之间存在关联。锂的明显保护作用值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Genotoxicity in humans exposed to arsenic, lithium, and boron in drinking water in the Bolivian Andes—A cross sectional study

Elevated concentrations of arsenic, lithium and boron in drinking water have already been reported in Bolivia. Arsenic is known to cause genotoxicity but that caused by lithium and boron is less well known. The aim of the present cross-sectional study was to evaluate potential genotoxic effects of exposure to arsenic, while considering exposure to lithium and boron and genetic susceptibility. Women (n = 230) were recruited in villages located around Lake Poopó. Exposure to arsenic was determined as the sum of concentrations of arsenic metabolites inorganic arsenic, monomethylarsonic acid (MMA), and dimethylarsinic acid (DMA) in urine. Exposure to lithium and boron was determined based on their concentrations in urine. Genetic susceptibility was determined by GSTM1 (glutathione S-transferase-mu-1) and GSTT1 (glutathione S-transferase-theta-1) null genotypes and AS3MT (Arsenite Methyltransferase) rs3740393. Genotoxicity was measured in peripheral blood leukocytes using the comet assay. The geometric means of arsenic, lithium, and boron concentrations were 68, 897, and 3972 μg/L, respectively. GSTM1 and GSTT1 null carriers had more DNA strand breaks than gene carriers (p = .008, p = .005). We found no correlation between urinary arsenic and DNA strand breaks (rS = .03, p = .64), and only a weak non-significant positive association in the adjusted multivariate analysis (β = .09 [−.03; .22], p = .14). Surprisingly, increasing concentrations of lithium in urine were negatively correlated with DNA strand breaks (rS = −.24, p = .0006), and the association persisted in multivariate analysis after adjusting for arsenic (β = −.22 [−.36; −.08], p = .003). We found no association between boron and DNA strand breaks. The apparent protective effect of lithium merits further investigation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
10.70%
发文量
52
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis publishes original research manuscripts, reviews and commentaries on topics related to six general areas, with an emphasis on subject matter most suited for the readership of EMM as outlined below. The journal is intended for investigators in fields such as molecular biology, biochemistry, microbiology, genetics and epigenetics, genomics and epigenomics, cancer research, neurobiology, heritable mutation, radiation biology, toxicology, and molecular & environmental epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Assessing the impact of different solvents in the bacterial reverse mutation test. Consensus findings of an International Workshops on Genotoxicity Testing workshop on using transcriptomic biomarkers to predict genotoxicity. Machine learning enhances genotoxicity assessment using MultiFlow® DNA damage assay. Genetic instability of a single exposure to sevoflurane at different concentrations in monitored mice. Outcome of IWGT workshop on transcriptomic biomarkers for genotoxicity: Key considerations for bioinformatics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1