新生儿克拉伯病筛查:现状和改进建议。

IF 4 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY International Journal of Neonatal Screening Pub Date : 2024-01-28 DOI:10.3390/ijns10010010
Dietrich Matern, Khaja Basheeruddin, Tracy L Klug, Gwendolyn McKee, Patricia U Edge, Patricia L Hall, Joanne Kurtzberg, Joseph J Orsini
{"title":"新生儿克拉伯病筛查:现状和改进建议。","authors":"Dietrich Matern, Khaja Basheeruddin, Tracy L Klug, Gwendolyn McKee, Patricia U Edge, Patricia L Hall, Joanne Kurtzberg, Joseph J Orsini","doi":"10.3390/ijns10010010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Krabbe disease (KD) is part of newborn screening (NBS) in 11 states with at least one additional state preparing to screen. In July 2021, KD was re-nominated for addition to the federal Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP) in the USA with a two-tiered strategy based on psychosine (PSY) as the determinant if an NBS result is positive or negative after a first-tier test revealed decreased galactocerebrosidase activity. Nine states currently screening for KD include PSY analysis in their screening strategy. However, the nomination was rejected in February 2023 because of perceived concerns about a high false positive rate, potential harm to newborns with an uncertain prognosis, and inadequate data on presymptomatic treatment benefit or harm. To address the concern about false positive NBS results, a survey was conducted of the eight NBS programs that use PSY and have been screening for KD for at least 1 year. Seven of eight states responded. We found that: (1) the use of PSY is variable; (2) when modeling the data based on the recommended screening strategy for KD, and applying different cutoffs for PSY, each state could virtually eliminate false positive results without major impact on sensitivity; (3) the reason for the diverse strategies appears to be primarily the difficulty of state programs to adjust screening algorithms due to the concern of possibly missing even an adult-onset case following a change that focuses on infantile and early infantile KD. Contracts with outside vendors and the effort/cost of making changes to a program's information systems can be additional obstacles. We recommend that programs review their historical NBS outcomes for KD with their advisory committees and make transparent decisions on whether to accept false positive results for such a devastating condition or to adjust their procedures to ensure an efficient, effective, and manageable NBS program for KD.</p>","PeriodicalId":14159,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Neonatal Screening","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10885092/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Newborn Screening for Krabbe Disease: Status Quo and Recommendations for Improvements.\",\"authors\":\"Dietrich Matern, Khaja Basheeruddin, Tracy L Klug, Gwendolyn McKee, Patricia U Edge, Patricia L Hall, Joanne Kurtzberg, Joseph J Orsini\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/ijns10010010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Krabbe disease (KD) is part of newborn screening (NBS) in 11 states with at least one additional state preparing to screen. In July 2021, KD was re-nominated for addition to the federal Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP) in the USA with a two-tiered strategy based on psychosine (PSY) as the determinant if an NBS result is positive or negative after a first-tier test revealed decreased galactocerebrosidase activity. Nine states currently screening for KD include PSY analysis in their screening strategy. However, the nomination was rejected in February 2023 because of perceived concerns about a high false positive rate, potential harm to newborns with an uncertain prognosis, and inadequate data on presymptomatic treatment benefit or harm. To address the concern about false positive NBS results, a survey was conducted of the eight NBS programs that use PSY and have been screening for KD for at least 1 year. Seven of eight states responded. We found that: (1) the use of PSY is variable; (2) when modeling the data based on the recommended screening strategy for KD, and applying different cutoffs for PSY, each state could virtually eliminate false positive results without major impact on sensitivity; (3) the reason for the diverse strategies appears to be primarily the difficulty of state programs to adjust screening algorithms due to the concern of possibly missing even an adult-onset case following a change that focuses on infantile and early infantile KD. Contracts with outside vendors and the effort/cost of making changes to a program's information systems can be additional obstacles. We recommend that programs review their historical NBS outcomes for KD with their advisory committees and make transparent decisions on whether to accept false positive results for such a devastating condition or to adjust their procedures to ensure an efficient, effective, and manageable NBS program for KD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Neonatal Screening\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10885092/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Neonatal Screening\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns10010010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Neonatal Screening","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns10010010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

克拉伯病(KD)是美国 11 个州新生儿筛查(NBS)的一部分,至少还有一个州准备进行筛查。2021 年 7 月,KD 被重新提名加入美国联邦推荐的统一筛查小组(RUSP),该小组采用两级策略,在一级检测发现半乳脑苷脂酶活性降低后,以精神氨酸(PSY)作为 NBS 结果是阳性还是阴性的决定因素。目前有九个州的 KD 筛查策略中包括 PSY 分析。然而,该提名于 2023 年 2 月被否决,原因是人们担心假阳性率过高、预后不确定的新生儿可能受到伤害,以及症状前治疗的益处或伤害数据不足。为了解决对 NBS 结果假阳性的担忧,我们对 8 个使用 PSY 并已筛查 KD 至少 1 年的 NBS 项目进行了调查。八个州中有七个做出了回应。我们发现(1) PSY 的使用情况各不相同;(2) 根据推荐的 KD 筛查策略建立数据模型,并应用不同的 PSY 临界值,每个州几乎都能消除假阳性结果,而不会对灵敏度产生重大影响;(3) 策略各不相同的原因似乎主要是各州的项目难以调整筛查算法,因为它们担心在重点关注婴儿和婴儿早期 KD 的变化之后,可能会漏掉甚至一个成人发病病例。与外部供应商签订的合同以及对项目信息系统进行更改的工作量/成本可能会成为额外的障碍。我们建议各项目与其咨询委员会一起审查其 KD NBS 的历史结果,并做出透明的决定,是接受这种破坏性疾病的假阳性结果,还是调整其程序以确保 KD NBS 项目的效率、效果和可管理性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Newborn Screening for Krabbe Disease: Status Quo and Recommendations for Improvements.

Krabbe disease (KD) is part of newborn screening (NBS) in 11 states with at least one additional state preparing to screen. In July 2021, KD was re-nominated for addition to the federal Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP) in the USA with a two-tiered strategy based on psychosine (PSY) as the determinant if an NBS result is positive or negative after a first-tier test revealed decreased galactocerebrosidase activity. Nine states currently screening for KD include PSY analysis in their screening strategy. However, the nomination was rejected in February 2023 because of perceived concerns about a high false positive rate, potential harm to newborns with an uncertain prognosis, and inadequate data on presymptomatic treatment benefit or harm. To address the concern about false positive NBS results, a survey was conducted of the eight NBS programs that use PSY and have been screening for KD for at least 1 year. Seven of eight states responded. We found that: (1) the use of PSY is variable; (2) when modeling the data based on the recommended screening strategy for KD, and applying different cutoffs for PSY, each state could virtually eliminate false positive results without major impact on sensitivity; (3) the reason for the diverse strategies appears to be primarily the difficulty of state programs to adjust screening algorithms due to the concern of possibly missing even an adult-onset case following a change that focuses on infantile and early infantile KD. Contracts with outside vendors and the effort/cost of making changes to a program's information systems can be additional obstacles. We recommend that programs review their historical NBS outcomes for KD with their advisory committees and make transparent decisions on whether to accept false positive results for such a devastating condition or to adjust their procedures to ensure an efficient, effective, and manageable NBS program for KD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Neonatal Screening
International Journal of Neonatal Screening Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Incidence of Inborn Errors of Metabolism and Endocrine Disorders Among 40965 Newborn Infants at Riyadh Second Health Cluster of the Ministry of Health Saudi Arabia. A Systematic Literature Review on the Global Status of Newborn Screening for Mucopolysaccharidosis II. The Value of Reducing Inconclusive and False-Positive Newborn Screening Results for Congenital Hypothyroidism, Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia and Maple Syrup Urine Disease in The Netherlands. Newborn Screening for Sickle Cell Disease in Catalonia between 2015 and 2022-Epidemiology and Impact on Clinical Events. Prevalence and Mutation Analysis of Short-Chain acyl-CoA Dehydrogenase Deficiency Detected by Newborn Screening in Hefei, China.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1