Newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) began in Guthrie's laboratory in 1961 for phenylketonuria. A federal study the following year formed the basis for expanding NBS as a public health function. Diseases detectable through NBS gradually expanded, eventually including sickle cell anemia, which was included in the screening panel in New York in 1975. Universal inclusion of full population screening for sickle cell anemia was included in all US NBS programs by 2006. Through the years, NBS for sickle cell anemia has expanded to include other clinically significant hemoglobin disorders (both hemoglobinopathies and thalassemias). While NBS programs exist in most high-income countries, their implementation in low- and middle-income settings has been slow, with the inclusion of hemoglobin disorders occurring even more slowly. It is particularly noteworthy that the low-resource settings with the highest incidences of sickle cell diseases (Sub-Saharan Africa, the Caribbean Islands, and India) and therefore the greatest potential for benefitting from NBS, continue to struggle with its implementation. Recent advances in curative treatments further emphasize the importance of NBS in early disease identification. This report reviews some of the history of newborn screening for hemoglobinopathies and thalassemias and provides an update of related activities currently ongoing globally.
{"title":"Newborn Screening for Hemoglobinopathies and Thalassemias: Brief History, Recent Activities, and Global Status-2026.","authors":"Bradford L Therrell","doi":"10.3390/ijns12010008","DOIUrl":"10.3390/ijns12010008","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) began in Guthrie's laboratory in 1961 for phenylketonuria. A federal study the following year formed the basis for expanding NBS as a public health function. Diseases detectable through NBS gradually expanded, eventually including sickle cell anemia, which was included in the screening panel in New York in 1975. Universal inclusion of full population screening for sickle cell anemia was included in all US NBS programs by 2006. Through the years, NBS for sickle cell anemia has expanded to include other clinically significant hemoglobin disorders (both hemoglobinopathies and thalassemias). While NBS programs exist in most high-income countries, their implementation in low- and middle-income settings has been slow, with the inclusion of hemoglobin disorders occurring even more slowly. It is particularly noteworthy that the low-resource settings with the highest incidences of sickle cell diseases (Sub-Saharan Africa, the Caribbean Islands, and India) and therefore the greatest potential for benefitting from NBS, continue to struggle with its implementation. Recent advances in curative treatments further emphasize the importance of NBS in early disease identification. This report reviews some of the history of newborn screening for hemoglobinopathies and thalassemias and provides an update of related activities currently ongoing globally.</p>","PeriodicalId":14159,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Neonatal Screening","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12922127/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146258081","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lisanne Vonk, Paula van Dommelen, Iris Eekhout, Noëlle N Uilenburg, Paul H Verkerk, Catharina Kitty P B van der Ploeg
In The Netherlands, preventive child healthcare (PCHC) has been carrying out neonatal hearing screening in well-babies since 2006. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between the age of newborns and the false positive referral rate of the first hearing screening using a transient evoked otoacoustic emission (OAE) test, to identify the most efficient timing for OAE screening. Additionally, we investigated the relationship between the type of OAE screening device (Echoscreen (ES)I/II versus ESIII) and the referral rate during the first screening. We used data from the Dutch universal well-baby neonatal hearing screening programme by PCHC between 2013 and 2023. Multilevel logistic regression analyses were performed to estimate the probability of a referral in 2023 for newborns screened in 2022 and 2023. We included a total of 1,650,506 newborns for 2013-2022 and 323,194 newborns for 2022-2023. The lowest false positive referral rates were found between days five and thirteen, ranging from 3.3 to 3.9%. ESIII significantly increased the probability of a referral compared to ESI/II (odds ratio = 1.84, 95% confidence interval = 1.65-2.06). In conclusion, the timing of neonatal hearing screening significantly impacts the false positive referral rate. Furthermore, the likelihood of a referral is significantly higher when using the ESIII compared to the ESI/II.
{"title":"Optimal Timing for Neonatal Hearing Screening in Well-Babies.","authors":"Lisanne Vonk, Paula van Dommelen, Iris Eekhout, Noëlle N Uilenburg, Paul H Verkerk, Catharina Kitty P B van der Ploeg","doi":"10.3390/ijns12010007","DOIUrl":"10.3390/ijns12010007","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In The Netherlands, preventive child healthcare (PCHC) has been carrying out neonatal hearing screening in well-babies since 2006. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between the age of newborns and the false positive referral rate of the first hearing screening using a transient evoked otoacoustic emission (OAE) test, to identify the most efficient timing for OAE screening. Additionally, we investigated the relationship between the type of OAE screening device (Echoscreen (ES)I/II versus ESIII) and the referral rate during the first screening. We used data from the Dutch universal well-baby neonatal hearing screening programme by PCHC between 2013 and 2023. Multilevel logistic regression analyses were performed to estimate the probability of a referral in 2023 for newborns screened in 2022 and 2023. We included a total of 1,650,506 newborns for 2013-2022 and 323,194 newborns for 2022-2023. The lowest false positive referral rates were found between days five and thirteen, ranging from 3.3 to 3.9%. ESIII significantly increased the probability of a referral compared to ESI/II (odds ratio = 1.84, 95% confidence interval = 1.65-2.06). In conclusion, the timing of neonatal hearing screening significantly impacts the false positive referral rate. Furthermore, the likelihood of a referral is significantly higher when using the ESIII compared to the ESI/II.</p>","PeriodicalId":14159,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Neonatal Screening","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12922009/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146258066","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Madalina Cristina Leanca, Gelu Onose, Georgiana Nicolae, Elena Neagu, Daniela Vasile, Ecaterina Bercu, Oana Mirabela Balanescu, Andrei Capitanescu, Constantin Munteanu, Cristina Popescu, Andrada Mirea
Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a severe genetic neuromuscular disorder caused by bi-allelic deletions or pathogenic SMN1 variants. Early diagnosis through neonatal screening is essential for timely therapeutic intervention, significantly improving clinical outcomes. In August 2022, a pilot neonatal screening program for SMA was launched in Romania, aiming to assess feasibility and impact. Objectives are to present the preliminary results of the ongoing SMA neonatal screening pilot program in Romania, evaluating its effectiveness in early detection and referral for treatment. The program started in August 2022 with four maternity hospitals and has progressively expanded to 28 maternity hospitals nationwide. Dried blood spot samples from newborns were analyzed for SMN1 gene deletions using real-time PCR. Positive results were confirmed through genetic testing, and affected infants, along with their families, were referred for further medical evaluation and early therapeutic intervention. Approximately 60,000 newborns have been screened since the program's inception, and 12 newborns tested positive for SMN1 deletions, resulting in an estimated incidence rate of 1 in 5125 live births. All confirmed cases were promptly referred for specialized care, with early access to disease-modifying therapies. The program has faced challenges in logistics, parental awareness, and equitable access to treatment, but its expansion from 4 to 28 maternities demonstrates increasing feasibility, suitability, and acceptance. Conclusions: The Romanian pilot neonatal screening program for SMA has successfully identified affected infants early, proving its feasibility and clinical impact. The ongoing expansion suggests a strong foundation for a future national program, which could significantly improve early SMA diagnosis and patient outcomes in Romania.
{"title":"Neonatal Genetic Screening Results for Spinal Muscular Atrophy in Romania: Insights from a 3-Years Pilot Program.","authors":"Madalina Cristina Leanca, Gelu Onose, Georgiana Nicolae, Elena Neagu, Daniela Vasile, Ecaterina Bercu, Oana Mirabela Balanescu, Andrei Capitanescu, Constantin Munteanu, Cristina Popescu, Andrada Mirea","doi":"10.3390/ijns12010006","DOIUrl":"10.3390/ijns12010006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a severe genetic neuromuscular disorder caused by bi-allelic deletions or pathogenic <i>SMN1</i> variants. Early diagnosis through neonatal screening is essential for timely therapeutic intervention, significantly improving clinical outcomes. In August 2022, a pilot neonatal screening program for SMA was launched in Romania, aiming to assess feasibility and impact. Objectives are to present the preliminary results of the ongoing SMA neonatal screening pilot program in Romania, evaluating its effectiveness in early detection and referral for treatment. The program started in August 2022 with four maternity hospitals and has progressively expanded to 28 maternity hospitals nationwide. Dried blood spot samples from newborns were analyzed for <i>SMN1</i> gene deletions using real-time PCR. Positive results were confirmed through genetic testing, and affected infants, along with their families, were referred for further medical evaluation and early therapeutic intervention. Approximately 60,000 newborns have been screened since the program's inception, and 12 newborns tested positive for <i>SMN1</i> deletions, resulting in an estimated incidence rate of 1 in 5125 live births. All confirmed cases were promptly referred for specialized care, with early access to disease-modifying therapies. The program has faced challenges in logistics, parental awareness, and equitable access to treatment, but its expansion from 4 to 28 maternities demonstrates increasing feasibility, suitability, and acceptance. Conclusions: The Romanian pilot neonatal screening program for SMA has successfully identified affected infants early, proving its feasibility and clinical impact. The ongoing expansion suggests a strong foundation for a future national program, which could significantly improve early SMA diagnosis and patient outcomes in Romania.</p>","PeriodicalId":14159,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Neonatal Screening","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12957999/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146258101","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Olumuyiwa S Folayan, Bose E Orimadegun, Adejumoke I Ayede, Baba P Inusa, Marika K Kase, John I Anetor
Newborn screening (NBS) is a cost-effective public health strategy for the early detection of congenital disorders that cause neonatal/infant morbidity and mortality. It is standard care in many high-income and emerging economies. Nigeria, despite its high birth number, has no newborn screening (NBS) programme for any disorder, causing missed opportunities for early therapy. This manuscript is a workshop report and expert consensus of a three-day national workshop organised by the Newborn Screening Consortium-Nigeria (NSC-N) in conjunction with The Federal Ministry of Health Nigeria, Revvity, and international partners. The first meeting comprised experts in different fields of newborn screening and newborn care who reviewed priority congenital disorders, implementation barriers, and national NBS needs in Nigeria. Experts presented pilot data, opinions, and global best practice evidence. Contributions were examined and debated and conclusions were reached by guided discussions and consensus agreement for a pragmatic nationwide NBS plan. The key outcomes were the urgency for Nigeria to begin an integrated, comprehensive NBS programme. Based on standard prioritisation criteria, sickle cell disease and congenital hypothyroidism were selected. Key implementation strategies included integration into routine maternal and child health services, establishing a national screening database, and developing a robust legislative and policy framework. The NBS workshop developed a framework to commence and incorporate integrated NBS into the Nigerian healthcare system. Two conditions were selected to kickstart the programme and establish a foundation for future expansion. This would improve neonatal health outcomes and reduce the long-term burden of congenital disorders.
{"title":"Integrated Newborn Screening in Nigeria: The Way Forward, A Workshop Report.","authors":"Olumuyiwa S Folayan, Bose E Orimadegun, Adejumoke I Ayede, Baba P Inusa, Marika K Kase, John I Anetor","doi":"10.3390/ijns12010005","DOIUrl":"10.3390/ijns12010005","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Newborn screening (NBS) is a cost-effective public health strategy for the early detection of congenital disorders that cause neonatal/infant morbidity and mortality. It is standard care in many high-income and emerging economies. Nigeria, despite its high birth number, has no newborn screening (NBS) programme for any disorder, causing missed opportunities for early therapy. This manuscript is a workshop report and expert consensus of a three-day national workshop organised by the Newborn Screening Consortium-Nigeria (NSC-N) in conjunction with The Federal Ministry of Health Nigeria, Revvity, and international partners. The first meeting comprised experts in different fields of newborn screening and newborn care who reviewed priority congenital disorders, implementation barriers, and national NBS needs in Nigeria. Experts presented pilot data, opinions, and global best practice evidence. Contributions were examined and debated and conclusions were reached by guided discussions and consensus agreement for a pragmatic nationwide NBS plan. The key outcomes were the urgency for Nigeria to begin an integrated, comprehensive NBS programme. Based on standard prioritisation criteria, sickle cell disease and congenital hypothyroidism were selected. Key implementation strategies included integration into routine maternal and child health services, establishing a national screening database, and developing a robust legislative and policy framework. The NBS workshop developed a framework to commence and incorporate integrated NBS into the Nigerian healthcare system. Two conditions were selected to kickstart the programme and establish a foundation for future expansion. This would improve neonatal health outcomes and reduce the long-term burden of congenital disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":14159,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Neonatal Screening","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12922088/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146258036","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Newborn screening (NBS) for sickle cell disease (SCD) has been performed in the United States (US) for decades, significantly reducing infant morbidity and mortality. A landmark clinical trial demonstrated that early identification of SCD enabled timely and life-saving prophylactic penicillin; this led to recommendations for universal NBS across the US. Early use of hydroxyurea as a safe and effective treatment for SCD further improved clinical outcomes by preventing acute and chronic disease complications. These advances add to the importance of early diagnosis through NBS, providing an opportunity for early treatment intervention. In recent years, high-resource countries-including those in Europe, the UK, and Canada-have adopted NBS for SCD using diverse strategies. Simultaneously, pilot programs in lower-resource settings such as Africa, Brazil, and India have demonstrated local feasibility and impact through implementation efforts. An overarching equity gap for achieving global NBS for SCD is the variable access to simple, accurate, and affordable testing. Other challenges include timing of NBS testing, targeted populations, laboratory methods, and parental education with genetic counseling. Questions remain about the equitable enrollment of affected infants worldwide into comprehensive care to ensure early treatment. These challenges raise concerns about sustainability, underscore the need for long-term funding and a strategic plan, and highlight persistent inequities from the lack of global NBS standards.
{"title":"Advances and Gaps in Global Newborn Screening for Sickle Cell Disease.","authors":"Lisa Marie Shook, Russell E Ware","doi":"10.3390/ijns12010004","DOIUrl":"10.3390/ijns12010004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Newborn screening (NBS) for sickle cell disease (SCD) has been performed in the United States (US) for decades, significantly reducing infant morbidity and mortality. A landmark clinical trial demonstrated that early identification of SCD enabled timely and life-saving prophylactic penicillin; this led to recommendations for universal NBS across the US. Early use of hydroxyurea as a safe and effective treatment for SCD further improved clinical outcomes by preventing acute and chronic disease complications. These advances add to the importance of early diagnosis through NBS, providing an opportunity for early treatment intervention. In recent years, high-resource countries-including those in Europe, the UK, and Canada-have adopted NBS for SCD using diverse strategies. Simultaneously, pilot programs in lower-resource settings such as Africa, Brazil, and India have demonstrated local feasibility and impact through implementation efforts. An overarching equity gap for achieving global NBS for SCD is the variable access to simple, accurate, and affordable testing. Other challenges include timing of NBS testing, targeted populations, laboratory methods, and parental education with genetic counseling. Questions remain about the equitable enrollment of affected infants worldwide into comprehensive care to ensure early treatment. These challenges raise concerns about sustainability, underscore the need for long-term funding and a strategic plan, and highlight persistent inequities from the lack of global NBS standards.</p>","PeriodicalId":14159,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Neonatal Screening","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12921897/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146258047","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Praveen Thokala, Alice Bessey, Rachel Knowles, John Marshall, Cristina Visintin, Miranda Lawton, Silvia Lombardo
Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a genetic condition that causes the degeneration of motor neurons in the spinal cord. Newborn blood spot (NBS) screening can potentially enable diagnosis before symptoms, and presymptomatic treatment is considered to be more effective than symptomatic treatment. In this paper, we present an overview of a cost-effectiveness model of NBS screening for SMA in the UK, informed by key clinical trials and the relevant published literature. Our analyses suggest that implementing screening could result in better outcomes and lower costs compared to the current approach of no screening plus treatment. However, several uncertainties and limitations of the model remain. These include uncertainty in the reimbursement status of nusinersen and risdiplam in the future; the 'actual' costs of treatments, as they are under confidential commercial agreements; uncertainty in the long-term effectiveness of presymptomatic and symptomatic treatment; and uncertainty around the incidence of SMA and the costs and the accuracy of NBS screening. An SMA in-service evaluation (ISE) that could capture data specific to the UK is under consideration, and an appropriately designed ISE with ongoing data collection could support periodic updates of clinical and cost-effectiveness estimates of NBS screening for SMA in the UK.
{"title":"Newborn Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy in the UK: Use of Modelling to Identify Priorities for Ongoing Evaluation.","authors":"Praveen Thokala, Alice Bessey, Rachel Knowles, John Marshall, Cristina Visintin, Miranda Lawton, Silvia Lombardo","doi":"10.3390/ijns12010003","DOIUrl":"10.3390/ijns12010003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a genetic condition that causes the degeneration of motor neurons in the spinal cord. Newborn blood spot (NBS) screening can potentially enable diagnosis before symptoms, and presymptomatic treatment is considered to be more effective than symptomatic treatment. In this paper, we present an overview of a cost-effectiveness model of NBS screening for SMA in the UK, informed by key clinical trials and the relevant published literature. Our analyses suggest that implementing screening could result in better outcomes and lower costs compared to the current approach of no screening plus treatment. However, several uncertainties and limitations of the model remain. These include uncertainty in the reimbursement status of nusinersen and risdiplam in the future; the 'actual' costs of treatments, as they are under confidential commercial agreements; uncertainty in the long-term effectiveness of presymptomatic and symptomatic treatment; and uncertainty around the incidence of SMA and the costs and the accuracy of NBS screening. An SMA in-service evaluation (ISE) that could capture data specific to the UK is under consideration, and an appropriately designed ISE with ongoing data collection could support periodic updates of clinical and cost-effectiveness estimates of NBS screening for SMA in the UK.</p>","PeriodicalId":14159,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Neonatal Screening","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12821460/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146010223","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mairéad Bracken-Scally, Anna O'Loughlin, Heather Burns
The aim of the evaluation was to gather information on parents' experiences and attitudes towards the Irish National Newborn Bloodspot Screening Programme (NNBSP). An interviewer-administered survey was completed by 151 parents whose babies underwent newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) between 2023 and 2025 and for whom the screening result was normal. Results suggest that NBS is highly acceptable to parents, with 100% glad their baby underwent screening. The majority (95%) felt they were provided the information needed to understand the importance of NBS for their baby, and 93% are in favour of screening for more conditions. Positive aspects of NBS reported by parents included the following: blood sampling being undertaken in the home, the sample-taker being very nice and being advised in advance to keep the baby's heel warm to ease the sampling process. Negative aspects of NBS reported included the following: having to return to the hospital for sampling, the baby becoming distressed, not receiving adequate information and not receiving the screening results. Parents were more likely to report negative experiences if the sample was not taken at home and if the sample was taken by a healthcare professional other than a public health nurse. Parents offered recommendations for improvements to the programme. This study provides important insights into parents' experiences and attitudes towards NBS in Ireland.
{"title":"Parent Experience and Attitudes Towards Newborn Bloodspot Screening in Ireland.","authors":"Mairéad Bracken-Scally, Anna O'Loughlin, Heather Burns","doi":"10.3390/ijns12010002","DOIUrl":"10.3390/ijns12010002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of the evaluation was to gather information on parents' experiences and attitudes towards the Irish National Newborn Bloodspot Screening Programme (NNBSP). An interviewer-administered survey was completed by 151 parents whose babies underwent newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) between 2023 and 2025 and for whom the screening result was normal. Results suggest that NBS is highly acceptable to parents, with 100% glad their baby underwent screening. The majority (95%) felt they were provided the information needed to understand the importance of NBS for their baby, and 93% are in favour of screening for more conditions. Positive aspects of NBS reported by parents included the following: blood sampling being undertaken in the home, the sample-taker being very nice and being advised in advance to keep the baby's heel warm to ease the sampling process. Negative aspects of NBS reported included the following: having to return to the hospital for sampling, the baby becoming distressed, not receiving adequate information and not receiving the screening results. Parents were more likely to report negative experiences if the sample was not taken at home and if the sample was taken by a healthcare professional other than a public health nurse. Parents offered recommendations for improvements to the programme. This study provides important insights into parents' experiences and attitudes towards NBS in Ireland.</p>","PeriodicalId":14159,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Neonatal Screening","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12821463/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146010250","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Nils W F Meijer, Hidde H Huidekoper, Klaas Koop, Sabine A Fuchs, M Rebecca Heiner Fokkema, Charlotte M A Lubout, Andrea B Haijer-Schreuder, Wouter F Visser, Rendelien K Verschoof-Puite, Eugènie Dekkers, Annet M Bosch, Rose E Maase, Monique G M de Sain-van der Velden
In the Netherlands, the newborn screening (NBS) program includes screening for propionic aciduria (PA) and methylmalonic aciduria (MMA). When initial screening reveals elevated C3 concentrations or abnormal ratios (C3/C2, C3/C16), a second-tier test measuring methylcitric acid (MCA) for PA and methylmalonic acid (MMAmb) for MMA is performed. While this two-tier approach reduces false positives effectively, it can delay referral from the NBS program and diagnosis of propionic aciduria. We describe four early-onset PA cases in which the current Dutch screening algorithm negatively impacted clinical outcomes, highlighting the need for expedited referral. We investigated different alternative screening strategies to identify the most effective approach for improving timeliness, while maintaining the high specificity of Dutch PA NBS. This revised approach prioritizes the evaluation of the C3/C2 ratio in first-tier screening. Specifically, samples with a C3/C2 ratio ≥ 0.75 should be referred directly for medical consultation and confirmatory testing. For all other samples with less pronounced biochemical abnormalities, the existing two-tier screening algorithm remains an appropriate NBS protocol. To position our approach internationally, a survey of European NBS programs was conducted to compare screening and referral protocols for PA across the region.
{"title":"Too Early to Tell? Balancing Diagnostic Accuracy of Newborn Screening for Propionic Acidemia Versus a Timely Referral.","authors":"Nils W F Meijer, Hidde H Huidekoper, Klaas Koop, Sabine A Fuchs, M Rebecca Heiner Fokkema, Charlotte M A Lubout, Andrea B Haijer-Schreuder, Wouter F Visser, Rendelien K Verschoof-Puite, Eugènie Dekkers, Annet M Bosch, Rose E Maase, Monique G M de Sain-van der Velden","doi":"10.3390/ijns12010001","DOIUrl":"10.3390/ijns12010001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the Netherlands, the newborn screening (NBS) program includes screening for propionic aciduria (PA) and methylmalonic aciduria (MMA). When initial screening reveals elevated C3 concentrations or abnormal ratios (C3/C2, C3/C16), a second-tier test measuring methylcitric acid (MCA) for PA and methylmalonic acid (MMA<sup>mb</sup>) for MMA is performed. While this two-tier approach reduces false positives effectively, it can delay referral from the NBS program and diagnosis of propionic aciduria. We describe four early-onset PA cases in which the current Dutch screening algorithm negatively impacted clinical outcomes, highlighting the need for expedited referral. We investigated different alternative screening strategies to identify the most effective approach for improving timeliness, while maintaining the high specificity of Dutch PA NBS. This revised approach prioritizes the evaluation of the C3/C2 ratio in first-tier screening. Specifically, samples with a C3/C2 ratio ≥ 0.75 should be referred directly for medical consultation and confirmatory testing. For all other samples with less pronounced biochemical abnormalities, the existing two-tier screening algorithm remains an appropriate NBS protocol. To position our approach internationally, a survey of European NBS programs was conducted to compare screening and referral protocols for PA across the region.</p>","PeriodicalId":14159,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Neonatal Screening","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12821464/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146010304","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Xuefang Jia, Ting Xie, Xiang Jiang, Fang Tang, Minyi Tan, Qianyu Chen, Sichi Liu, Yonglan Huang, Li Tao
This study was designed to assess the effectiveness of neonatal congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) screening in Guangzhou, China. A total of 818,417 newborns were screened for CAH by measuring 17-hydroxyprogesterone (17-OHP) concentrations. Cut-off values were stratified based on gestational age (GA) and the timing of sample collection. Neonates with initial positive results (17-OHP ≥ cut-off value) were recalled for a second dried blood spot sample to reassess 17-OHP levels. Confirmatory testing involved biochemical analyses, Sanger sequencing, and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification of the CYP21A2 gene. From 2018 to 2024, a total of 40 patients with classical 21-hydroxylase deficiency were identified, including 28 cases (70%) of the salt-wasting form and 12 cases (30%) of the simple virilizing form. The overall incidence of CAH was 1 in 20,653 (95% confidence interval: 1:34,928, 1:14,661). No statistically significant differences in prevalence were observed between sexes or between preterm and full-term infants (p > 0.05). 17-OHP concentrations are influenced by GA and the timing of sample collection. The screening efficiency for CAH could be improved by adopting a multitiered cut-off value system adjusted for GA and collection time.
{"title":"Neonatal Screening for Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia in Guangzhou: 7 Years of Experience.","authors":"Xuefang Jia, Ting Xie, Xiang Jiang, Fang Tang, Minyi Tan, Qianyu Chen, Sichi Liu, Yonglan Huang, Li Tao","doi":"10.3390/ijns11040116","DOIUrl":"10.3390/ijns11040116","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study was designed to assess the effectiveness of neonatal congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) screening in Guangzhou, China. A total of 818,417 newborns were screened for CAH by measuring 17-hydroxyprogesterone (17-OHP) concentrations. Cut-off values were stratified based on gestational age (GA) and the timing of sample collection. Neonates with initial positive results (17-OHP ≥ cut-off value) were recalled for a second dried blood spot sample to reassess 17-OHP levels. Confirmatory testing involved biochemical analyses, Sanger sequencing, and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification of the <i>CYP21A2</i> gene. From 2018 to 2024, a total of 40 patients with classical 21-hydroxylase deficiency were identified, including 28 cases (70%) of the salt-wasting form and 12 cases (30%) of the simple virilizing form. The overall incidence of CAH was 1 in 20,653 (95% confidence interval: 1:34,928, 1:14,661). No statistically significant differences in prevalence were observed between sexes or between preterm and full-term infants (<i>p</i> > 0.05). 17-OHP concentrations are influenced by GA and the timing of sample collection. The screening efficiency for CAH could be improved by adopting a multitiered cut-off value system adjusted for GA and collection time.</p>","PeriodicalId":14159,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Neonatal Screening","volume":"11 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12733672/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145819149","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Vincenza Gragnaniello, Giacomo Gaiga, Chiara Cazzorla, Elena Porcù, Daniela Gueraldi, Andrea Puma, Christian Loro, Mara Doimo, Leonardo Salviati, Alberto B Burlina
3-Methylcrotonyl-CoA carboxylase deficiency (3-MCCD) is a metabolic disorder with a wide clinical spectrum ranging from asymptomatic individuals to severe metabolic decompensation. Following the introduction of expanded newborn screening, a high number of asymptomatic individuals with 3-MCCD were identified, prompting debates about its inclusion in screening panels. In order to inform policy and healthcare decisions regarding the inclusion of 3-MCCD in newborn screening programs, we evaluated the long-term outcomes for newborns with positive results over a decade of screening experience in North-East Italy, as well as the psychological impact on their parents. Of the 336,668 newborns screened between 2014 and 2025, 9 were confirmed to be affected. These infants underwent annual clinical and biochemical assessments, including dried blood spot acylcarnitine profile, plasma free carnitine, and urinary organic acids assays. An emergency protocol was provided to all affected children to manage intercurrent illnesses. An ad hoc survey was developed to assess the psychological impact of the disease on parents. During follow-up (mean age at last visit: 4.2 years), one patient experienced metabolic decompensation during an intercurrent illness, which was promptly treated. One patient presented with growth retardation and another with transient psychomotor delay. Five patients developed carnitine deficiency, requiring supplementation. Psychological assessments revealed an initial high level of parental psychological impact, which decreased over time. All parents strongly supported the screening program. Newborn screening for 3-MCCD enabled the early identification and management of affected individuals, thereby avoiding severe metabolic decompensation. Although there is an initial psychological burden on parents, it significantly decreases over time. Therefore, the long-term benefits of newborn screening for 3-MCCD seem to outweigh the psychological drawbacks.
{"title":"Psychological Impact of Newborn Screening for 3-Methylcrotonyl-CoA Carboxylase Deficiency: The Parental Experience.","authors":"Vincenza Gragnaniello, Giacomo Gaiga, Chiara Cazzorla, Elena Porcù, Daniela Gueraldi, Andrea Puma, Christian Loro, Mara Doimo, Leonardo Salviati, Alberto B Burlina","doi":"10.3390/ijns11040115","DOIUrl":"10.3390/ijns11040115","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>3-Methylcrotonyl-CoA carboxylase deficiency (3-MCCD) is a metabolic disorder with a wide clinical spectrum ranging from asymptomatic individuals to severe metabolic decompensation. Following the introduction of expanded newborn screening, a high number of asymptomatic individuals with 3-MCCD were identified, prompting debates about its inclusion in screening panels. In order to inform policy and healthcare decisions regarding the inclusion of 3-MCCD in newborn screening programs, we evaluated the long-term outcomes for newborns with positive results over a decade of screening experience in North-East Italy, as well as the psychological impact on their parents. Of the 336,668 newborns screened between 2014 and 2025, 9 were confirmed to be affected. These infants underwent annual clinical and biochemical assessments, including dried blood spot acylcarnitine profile, plasma free carnitine, and urinary organic acids assays. An emergency protocol was provided to all affected children to manage intercurrent illnesses. An ad hoc survey was developed to assess the psychological impact of the disease on parents. During follow-up (mean age at last visit: 4.2 years), one patient experienced metabolic decompensation during an intercurrent illness, which was promptly treated. One patient presented with growth retardation and another with transient psychomotor delay. Five patients developed carnitine deficiency, requiring supplementation. Psychological assessments revealed an initial high level of parental psychological impact, which decreased over time. All parents strongly supported the screening program. Newborn screening for 3-MCCD enabled the early identification and management of affected individuals, thereby avoiding severe metabolic decompensation. Although there is an initial psychological burden on parents, it significantly decreases over time. Therefore, the long-term benefits of newborn screening for 3-MCCD seem to outweigh the psychological drawbacks.</p>","PeriodicalId":14159,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Neonatal Screening","volume":"11 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12733732/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145819136","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}