原发性侧索硬化症:2020 年共识诊断标准在基于专家意见的 PLS 队列中的应用和验证。

IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-07-15 DOI:10.1136/jnnp-2023-333023
Simon Witzel, Veronika Micca, Hans P Müller, André Huss, Franziska Bachhuber, Johannes Dorst, Dorothée E Lulé, Hayrettin Tumani, Jan Kassubek, Albert C Ludolph
{"title":"原发性侧索硬化症:2020 年共识诊断标准在基于专家意见的 PLS 队列中的应用和验证。","authors":"Simon Witzel, Veronika Micca, Hans P Müller, André Huss, Franziska Bachhuber, Johannes Dorst, Dorothée E Lulé, Hayrettin Tumani, Jan Kassubek, Albert C Ludolph","doi":"10.1136/jnnp-2023-333023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Validation of the 2020 consensus criteria for primary lateral sclerosis (PLS) is essential for their use in clinical practice and future trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a large cohort of patients diagnosed with PLS by expert opinion prior to the new criteria with detailed clinical baseline evaluation (n=107) and longitudinal follow-up (n=63), we applied the new diagnostic criteria and analysed the clinical phenotype, electromyography (EMG), diagnostic accuracy and prognosis, adding neurofilaments and MRI as potential biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The criteria for definite PLS were met by 28% and those for probable PLS by 19%, whereas 53% did not meet the full criteria at baseline, mainly due to the time, EMG and region criteria. Patients not meeting the criteria had less generalised upper motor neuron involvement but were otherwise similar in demographic and clinical characteristics. All patients with definite and probable PLS maintained PLS diagnosis during follow-up, while four patients not meeting the criteria developed clinical lower motor neuron involvement. Definite PLS cases showed improved survival compared with probable PLS and patients who did not meet the criteria. Despite a clinical PLS phenotype, fibrillation potentials/positive sharp waves and fasciculations in one or more muscles were a frequent EMG finding, with the extent and prognostic significance depending on disease duration. Serum neurofilament light and a multiparametric MRI fibre integrity Z-score correlated with clinical parameters and were identified as potential biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Validation of the 2020 PLS consensus criteria revealed high diagnostic certainty and prognostic significance, supporting their value for research and clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":16418,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Primary lateral sclerosis: application and validation of the 2020 consensus diagnostic criteria in an expert opinion-based PLS cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Simon Witzel, Veronika Micca, Hans P Müller, André Huss, Franziska Bachhuber, Johannes Dorst, Dorothée E Lulé, Hayrettin Tumani, Jan Kassubek, Albert C Ludolph\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jnnp-2023-333023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Validation of the 2020 consensus criteria for primary lateral sclerosis (PLS) is essential for their use in clinical practice and future trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a large cohort of patients diagnosed with PLS by expert opinion prior to the new criteria with detailed clinical baseline evaluation (n=107) and longitudinal follow-up (n=63), we applied the new diagnostic criteria and analysed the clinical phenotype, electromyography (EMG), diagnostic accuracy and prognosis, adding neurofilaments and MRI as potential biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The criteria for definite PLS were met by 28% and those for probable PLS by 19%, whereas 53% did not meet the full criteria at baseline, mainly due to the time, EMG and region criteria. Patients not meeting the criteria had less generalised upper motor neuron involvement but were otherwise similar in demographic and clinical characteristics. All patients with definite and probable PLS maintained PLS diagnosis during follow-up, while four patients not meeting the criteria developed clinical lower motor neuron involvement. Definite PLS cases showed improved survival compared with probable PLS and patients who did not meet the criteria. Despite a clinical PLS phenotype, fibrillation potentials/positive sharp waves and fasciculations in one or more muscles were a frequent EMG finding, with the extent and prognostic significance depending on disease duration. Serum neurofilament light and a multiparametric MRI fibre integrity Z-score correlated with clinical parameters and were identified as potential biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Validation of the 2020 PLS consensus criteria revealed high diagnostic certainty and prognostic significance, supporting their value for research and clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2023-333023\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2023-333023","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:原发性脊髓侧索硬化症(PLS)2020 年共识标准的验证对于其在临床实践中的应用至关重要:2020年原发性侧索硬化症(PLS)共识标准的验证对于其在临床实践和未来试验中的应用至关重要:方法:在新标准出台前,我们对根据专家意见诊断为原发性脊髓侧索硬化症的大量患者进行了详细的临床基线评估(107 例)和纵向随访(63 例),我们应用了新的诊断标准,分析了临床表型、肌电图(EMG)、诊断准确性和预后,并增加了神经丝和核磁共振成像作为潜在的生物标志物:28%的患者符合确诊PLS的标准,19%的患者符合可能PLS的标准,而53%的患者在基线时不符合全部标准,这主要是由于时间、肌电图和区域标准造成的。不符合标准的患者全身上运动神经元受累程度较轻,但在其他方面的人口统计学和临床特征相似。所有确诊和可能确诊为 PLS 的患者在随访期间都保持了 PLS 诊断,而四名不符合标准的患者出现了临床下运动神经元受累。与可能的 PLS 患者和不符合标准的患者相比,明确的 PLS 患者的生存率有所提高。尽管存在临床 PLS 表型,但肌电图经常发现颤动电位/阳性尖波和一块或多块肌肉的筋束,其程度和预后意义取决于病程长短。血清神经丝光和多参数磁共振成像纤维完整性Z-分数与临床参数相关,并被确定为潜在的生物标志物:对 2020 PLS 共识标准的验证表明,该标准具有很高的诊断确定性和预后意义,支持其在研究和临床实践中的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Primary lateral sclerosis: application and validation of the 2020 consensus diagnostic criteria in an expert opinion-based PLS cohort.

Background: Validation of the 2020 consensus criteria for primary lateral sclerosis (PLS) is essential for their use in clinical practice and future trials.

Methods: In a large cohort of patients diagnosed with PLS by expert opinion prior to the new criteria with detailed clinical baseline evaluation (n=107) and longitudinal follow-up (n=63), we applied the new diagnostic criteria and analysed the clinical phenotype, electromyography (EMG), diagnostic accuracy and prognosis, adding neurofilaments and MRI as potential biomarkers.

Results: The criteria for definite PLS were met by 28% and those for probable PLS by 19%, whereas 53% did not meet the full criteria at baseline, mainly due to the time, EMG and region criteria. Patients not meeting the criteria had less generalised upper motor neuron involvement but were otherwise similar in demographic and clinical characteristics. All patients with definite and probable PLS maintained PLS diagnosis during follow-up, while four patients not meeting the criteria developed clinical lower motor neuron involvement. Definite PLS cases showed improved survival compared with probable PLS and patients who did not meet the criteria. Despite a clinical PLS phenotype, fibrillation potentials/positive sharp waves and fasciculations in one or more muscles were a frequent EMG finding, with the extent and prognostic significance depending on disease duration. Serum neurofilament light and a multiparametric MRI fibre integrity Z-score correlated with clinical parameters and were identified as potential biomarkers.

Conclusion: Validation of the 2020 PLS consensus criteria revealed high diagnostic certainty and prognostic significance, supporting their value for research and clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
1.80%
发文量
888
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (JNNP) aspires to publish groundbreaking and cutting-edge research worldwide. Covering the entire spectrum of neurological sciences, the journal focuses on common disorders like stroke, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, epilepsy, peripheral neuropathy, subarachnoid haemorrhage, and neuropsychiatry, while also addressing complex challenges such as ALS. With early online publication, regular podcasts, and an extensive archive collection boasting the longest half-life in clinical neuroscience journals, JNNP aims to be a trailblazer in the field.
期刊最新文献
Apheresis therapies in MOGAD: a retrospective study of 117 therapeutic interventions in 571 attacks. Response to: 'Cortical Inexcitability in ALS: Correlating a Clinical Phenotype'. MYH7-related myopathies: clinical, myopathological and genotypic spectrum in a multicentre French cohort. Huntington's disease phenocopy syndromes revisited: a clinical comparison and next-generation sequencing exploration. Exercise as medicine in Parkinson's disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1