吸烟与静脉血栓栓塞症之间不存在遗传因果关系:双样本孟德尔随机研究

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Thrombosis and haemostasis Pub Date : 2024-02-22 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1781425
Hong-Cheng Du, Yun-Fei Zheng, Meng-Qi Shen, Bai-Yang Deng
{"title":"吸烟与静脉血栓栓塞症之间不存在遗传因果关系:双样本孟德尔随机研究","authors":"Hong-Cheng Du, Yun-Fei Zheng, Meng-Qi Shen, Bai-Yang Deng","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1781425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Given the current debate in clinical research about the relationship between tobacco smoking and the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), a Mendelian randomization (MR) study was conducted aimed at elucidating the causal associations of current and past tobacco smoking with the risk of VTE, from the perspective of genetics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Two-sample univariate and multivariable MR analyses were designed, using summary-level data from large genome-wide association studies involving European individuals. Causality was primarily assessed using multiplicative fixed-effects or random-effects model and inverse variance weighting, supplemented by MR-Egger regression, MR-PRESSO, Cochran's Q test, and leave-one-out for sensitivity analysis to test the reliability of the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> In the univariate MR analysis, no significant causal effects were found between current tobacco smoking and the risk of VTE, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and pulmonary embolism (PE). Similarly, no significant causal effects were found between past smoking and VTE, DVT, and PE. As for the multivariable MR analysis, results were consistent with univariate MR analysis, with no significant causal effect of either current or past tobacco smoking on the risk of VTE, DVT, and PE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Evidence from both univariate and multivariable MR analyses demonstrated no significant causal relationships between current and past tobacco smoking and VTE, DVT, and PE. This contradicts positive correlations reported in some previous observational studies, which may be explained by other confounding factors. This provided genetic evidence for the conclusion reported in other observational studies that smoking did not affect VTE risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":23036,"journal":{"name":"Thrombosis and haemostasis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No Genetic Causality between Tobacco Smoking and Venous Thromboembolism: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study.\",\"authors\":\"Hong-Cheng Du, Yun-Fei Zheng, Meng-Qi Shen, Bai-Yang Deng\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0044-1781425\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Given the current debate in clinical research about the relationship between tobacco smoking and the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), a Mendelian randomization (MR) study was conducted aimed at elucidating the causal associations of current and past tobacco smoking with the risk of VTE, from the perspective of genetics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Two-sample univariate and multivariable MR analyses were designed, using summary-level data from large genome-wide association studies involving European individuals. Causality was primarily assessed using multiplicative fixed-effects or random-effects model and inverse variance weighting, supplemented by MR-Egger regression, MR-PRESSO, Cochran's Q test, and leave-one-out for sensitivity analysis to test the reliability of the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> In the univariate MR analysis, no significant causal effects were found between current tobacco smoking and the risk of VTE, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and pulmonary embolism (PE). Similarly, no significant causal effects were found between past smoking and VTE, DVT, and PE. As for the multivariable MR analysis, results were consistent with univariate MR analysis, with no significant causal effect of either current or past tobacco smoking on the risk of VTE, DVT, and PE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Evidence from both univariate and multivariable MR analyses demonstrated no significant causal relationships between current and past tobacco smoking and VTE, DVT, and PE. This contradicts positive correlations reported in some previous observational studies, which may be explained by other confounding factors. This provided genetic evidence for the conclusion reported in other observational studies that smoking did not affect VTE risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thrombosis and haemostasis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thrombosis and haemostasis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1781425\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thrombosis and haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1781425","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究背景鉴于目前临床研究中关于吸烟与静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)风险之间关系的争论,我们开展了一项孟德尔随机化(MR)研究,旨在从遗传学的角度阐明当前和过去吸烟与 VTE 风险之间的因果关系:方法:利用涉及欧洲人的大型全基因组关联研究的汇总数据,设计了双样本单变量和多变量 MR 分析。因果关系主要通过乘法固定效应或随机效应模型和反方差加权进行评估,并辅以MR-Egger回归、MR-PRESSO、Cochran's Q检验和leave-one-out进行敏感性分析,以检验结果的可靠性:在单变量MR分析中,未发现当前吸烟与VTE、深静脉血栓(DVT)和肺栓塞(PE)风险之间存在显著的因果关系。同样,既往吸烟与 VTE、DVT 和 PE 之间也没有发现明显的因果关系。至于多变量磁共振分析,结果与单变量磁共振分析一致,当前或既往吸烟对VTE、DVT和PE的风险均无明显的因果关系:单变量和多变量磁共振分析的证据表明,当前和既往吸烟与 VTE、DVT 和 PE 之间没有明显的因果关系。这与之前一些观察性研究中报告的正相关性相矛盾,后者可能是由其他混杂因素造成的。这为其他观察性研究中报告的吸烟不影响 VTE 风险的结论提供了遗传学证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
No Genetic Causality between Tobacco Smoking and Venous Thromboembolism: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study.

Background:  Given the current debate in clinical research about the relationship between tobacco smoking and the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), a Mendelian randomization (MR) study was conducted aimed at elucidating the causal associations of current and past tobacco smoking with the risk of VTE, from the perspective of genetics.

Methods:  Two-sample univariate and multivariable MR analyses were designed, using summary-level data from large genome-wide association studies involving European individuals. Causality was primarily assessed using multiplicative fixed-effects or random-effects model and inverse variance weighting, supplemented by MR-Egger regression, MR-PRESSO, Cochran's Q test, and leave-one-out for sensitivity analysis to test the reliability of the results.

Results:  In the univariate MR analysis, no significant causal effects were found between current tobacco smoking and the risk of VTE, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and pulmonary embolism (PE). Similarly, no significant causal effects were found between past smoking and VTE, DVT, and PE. As for the multivariable MR analysis, results were consistent with univariate MR analysis, with no significant causal effect of either current or past tobacco smoking on the risk of VTE, DVT, and PE.

Conclusion:  Evidence from both univariate and multivariable MR analyses demonstrated no significant causal relationships between current and past tobacco smoking and VTE, DVT, and PE. This contradicts positive correlations reported in some previous observational studies, which may be explained by other confounding factors. This provided genetic evidence for the conclusion reported in other observational studies that smoking did not affect VTE risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Thrombosis and haemostasis
Thrombosis and haemostasis 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
9.00%
发文量
140
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Thrombosis and Haemostasis publishes reports on basic, translational and clinical research dedicated to novel results and highest quality in any area of thrombosis and haemostasis, vascular biology and medicine, inflammation and infection, platelet and leukocyte biology, from genetic, molecular & cellular studies, diagnostic, therapeutic & preventative studies to high-level translational and clinical research. The journal provides position and guideline papers, state-of-the-art papers, expert analysis and commentaries, and dedicated theme issues covering recent developments and key topics in the field.
期刊最新文献
Carotid Stenosis and Stroke: Medicines, Stents, Surgery-"Wait-and-See" or Protect? Risk Factors, Antithrombotic Management, and Long-Term Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Endovascular Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms. Monocyte Subsets in Cardiovascular Disease: A Biomarker Perspective. Risk of Major Bleeding with Antiplatelet and/or Anticoagulation Therapy in Inherited Factor XI Deficiency: Insights from Real-World Observations. Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting sepsis-induced coagulopathy in septic patients: mixed cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1