场所评级与预防犯罪:探索通过用户生成的评级来评估场所管理

IF 7.1 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Computers Environment and Urban Systems Pub Date : 2024-02-23 DOI:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2024.102088
Thom Snaphaan , Wim Hardyns , Lieven J.R. Pauwels , Kate Bowers
{"title":"场所评级与预防犯罪:探索通过用户生成的评级来评估场所管理","authors":"Thom Snaphaan ,&nbsp;Wim Hardyns ,&nbsp;Lieven J.R. Pauwels ,&nbsp;Kate Bowers","doi":"10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2024.102088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study assesses how the quality of place management (measured with user-generated ratings from Google Places) is related to crime occurrences at specific settings and whether specific crime types are related to specific types of places. In 50 randomly sampled neighborhoods in Ghent (Belgium) and London (United Kingdom), we analyzed Google Places data as a proxy measure for the quality of place management at the street segment level. We used hurdle models to examine the effects for both the prevalence and frequency of crime at micro places, and to deal with excess zeros in the data. User-generated ratings of places provide a useful place-level indicator for place management that are related to crime. However, contextual differences are found between Ghent and London. For London, the results suggest that higher quality of place management has a protective effect on crime occurrences at the street segment level. This study indicates the importance of exploring new and emerging data sources as unique measurement opportunities to enhance insight in crime prevention mechanisms, and also acknowledges its limitations. For the first time from a large-scale empirical perspective, this study suggest that improving place management at specific places might be an effective intervention to guard against crime.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48241,"journal":{"name":"Computers Environment and Urban Systems","volume":"109 ","pages":"Article 102088"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rating places and crime prevention: Exploring user-generated ratings to assess place management\",\"authors\":\"Thom Snaphaan ,&nbsp;Wim Hardyns ,&nbsp;Lieven J.R. Pauwels ,&nbsp;Kate Bowers\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2024.102088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study assesses how the quality of place management (measured with user-generated ratings from Google Places) is related to crime occurrences at specific settings and whether specific crime types are related to specific types of places. In 50 randomly sampled neighborhoods in Ghent (Belgium) and London (United Kingdom), we analyzed Google Places data as a proxy measure for the quality of place management at the street segment level. We used hurdle models to examine the effects for both the prevalence and frequency of crime at micro places, and to deal with excess zeros in the data. User-generated ratings of places provide a useful place-level indicator for place management that are related to crime. However, contextual differences are found between Ghent and London. For London, the results suggest that higher quality of place management has a protective effect on crime occurrences at the street segment level. This study indicates the importance of exploring new and emerging data sources as unique measurement opportunities to enhance insight in crime prevention mechanisms, and also acknowledges its limitations. For the first time from a large-scale empirical perspective, this study suggest that improving place management at specific places might be an effective intervention to guard against crime.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers Environment and Urban Systems\",\"volume\":\"109 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102088\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers Environment and Urban Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0198971524000176\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers Environment and Urban Systems","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0198971524000176","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估了场所管理质量(通过谷歌场所的用户评分来衡量)与特定场所的犯罪发生率之间的关系,以及特定犯罪类型是否与特定类型的场所有关。在根特(比利时)和伦敦(英国)随机抽取的 50 个社区中,我们分析了 Google Places 数据,将其作为街道层面场所管理质量的替代衡量标准。我们使用阶跃模型来检验微观场所犯罪率和频率的影响,并处理数据中多余的零。用户对场所的评分为与犯罪有关的场所管理提供了一个有用的场所级指标。不过,根特和伦敦的情况有所不同。伦敦的研究结果表明,较高的场所管理质量对街道层面的犯罪率具有保护作用。这项研究表明了探索新兴数据源作为独特测量机会的重要性,以提高对犯罪预防机制的洞察力,同时也承认了其局限性。本研究首次从大规模实证的角度提出,改善特定场所的场所管理可能是防范犯罪的有效干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rating places and crime prevention: Exploring user-generated ratings to assess place management

This study assesses how the quality of place management (measured with user-generated ratings from Google Places) is related to crime occurrences at specific settings and whether specific crime types are related to specific types of places. In 50 randomly sampled neighborhoods in Ghent (Belgium) and London (United Kingdom), we analyzed Google Places data as a proxy measure for the quality of place management at the street segment level. We used hurdle models to examine the effects for both the prevalence and frequency of crime at micro places, and to deal with excess zeros in the data. User-generated ratings of places provide a useful place-level indicator for place management that are related to crime. However, contextual differences are found between Ghent and London. For London, the results suggest that higher quality of place management has a protective effect on crime occurrences at the street segment level. This study indicates the importance of exploring new and emerging data sources as unique measurement opportunities to enhance insight in crime prevention mechanisms, and also acknowledges its limitations. For the first time from a large-scale empirical perspective, this study suggest that improving place management at specific places might be an effective intervention to guard against crime.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
111
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Computers, Environment and Urban Systemsis an interdisciplinary journal publishing cutting-edge and innovative computer-based research on environmental and urban systems, that privileges the geospatial perspective. The journal welcomes original high quality scholarship of a theoretical, applied or technological nature, and provides a stimulating presentation of perspectives, research developments, overviews of important new technologies and uses of major computational, information-based, and visualization innovations. Applied and theoretical contributions demonstrate the scope of computer-based analysis fostering a better understanding of environmental and urban systems, their spatial scope and their dynamics.
期刊最新文献
Estimating the density of urban trees in 1890s Leeds and Edinburgh using object detection on historical maps The role of data resolution in analyzing urban form and PM2.5 concentration Causal discovery and analysis of global city carbon emissions based on data-driven and hybrid intelligence Editorial Board Exploring the built environment impacts on Online Car-hailing waiting time: An empirical study in Beijing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1