发育中的大脑皮层具有功能多能性:失明的证据

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-02-21 DOI:10.1016/j.dcn.2024.101360
Elizabeth J. Saccone , Mengyu Tian , Marina Bedny
{"title":"发育中的大脑皮层具有功能多能性:失明的证据","authors":"Elizabeth J. Saccone ,&nbsp;Mengyu Tian ,&nbsp;Marina Bedny","doi":"10.1016/j.dcn.2024.101360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>How rigidly does innate architecture constrain function of developing cortex? What is the contribution of early experience? We review insights into these questions from visual cortex function in people born blind. In blindness, occipital cortices are active during auditory and tactile tasks. What ‘cross-modal’ plasticity tells us about cortical flexibility is debated. On the one hand, visual networks of blind people respond to higher cognitive information, such as sentence grammar, suggesting drastic repurposing. On the other, in line with ‘metamodal’ accounts, sighted and blind populations show shared domain preferences in ventral occipito-temporal cortex (vOTC), suggesting visual areas switch input modality but perform the same or similar perceptual functions (e.g., face recognition) in blindness. Here we bring these disparate literatures together, reviewing and synthesizing evidence that speaks to whether visual cortices have similar or different functions in blind and sighted people. Together, the evidence suggests that in blindness, visual cortices are incorporated into higher-cognitive (e.g., fronto-parietal) networks, which are a major source long-range input to the visual system. We propose <em>the connectivity-constrained experience-dependent account</em>. Functional development is constrained by innate anatomical connectivity, experience and behavioral needs. Infant cortex is pluripotent, the same anatomical constraints develop into different functional outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49083,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878929324000215/pdfft?md5=62c18e2da3ad0286457c1f0beb59fe12&pid=1-s2.0-S1878929324000215-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing cortex is functionally pluripotent: Evidence from blindness\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth J. Saccone ,&nbsp;Mengyu Tian ,&nbsp;Marina Bedny\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dcn.2024.101360\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>How rigidly does innate architecture constrain function of developing cortex? What is the contribution of early experience? We review insights into these questions from visual cortex function in people born blind. In blindness, occipital cortices are active during auditory and tactile tasks. What ‘cross-modal’ plasticity tells us about cortical flexibility is debated. On the one hand, visual networks of blind people respond to higher cognitive information, such as sentence grammar, suggesting drastic repurposing. On the other, in line with ‘metamodal’ accounts, sighted and blind populations show shared domain preferences in ventral occipito-temporal cortex (vOTC), suggesting visual areas switch input modality but perform the same or similar perceptual functions (e.g., face recognition) in blindness. Here we bring these disparate literatures together, reviewing and synthesizing evidence that speaks to whether visual cortices have similar or different functions in blind and sighted people. Together, the evidence suggests that in blindness, visual cortices are incorporated into higher-cognitive (e.g., fronto-parietal) networks, which are a major source long-range input to the visual system. We propose <em>the connectivity-constrained experience-dependent account</em>. Functional development is constrained by innate anatomical connectivity, experience and behavioral needs. Infant cortex is pluripotent, the same anatomical constraints develop into different functional outcomes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878929324000215/pdfft?md5=62c18e2da3ad0286457c1f0beb59fe12&pid=1-s2.0-S1878929324000215-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878929324000215\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878929324000215","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

先天结构对发育中大脑皮层功能的限制有多严格?早期经验的贡献是什么?我们回顾了先天性失明者视觉皮层功能对这些问题的启示。在失明的情况下,枕叶皮层在执行听觉和触觉任务时非常活跃。关于 "跨模态 "可塑性对大脑皮层灵活性的影响,目前还存在争议。一方面,盲人的视觉网络会对句子语法等高级认知信息做出反应,这表明盲人的大脑皮层会发生剧烈的重塑。另一方面,与 "元模式 "观点一致的是,明眼人和盲人在腹枕颞皮层(vOTC)中表现出共同的领域偏好,这表明视觉区域可以转换输入模式,但在盲人中却能执行相同或相似的感知功能(如人脸识别)。在此,我们将这些不同的文献汇集在一起,回顾并综合了有关盲人和健视者的视觉皮层是否具有相似或不同功能的证据。这些证据共同表明,在盲人中,视觉皮层被纳入高级认知(如前顶叶)网络,而高级认知网络是视觉系统远距离输入的主要来源。我们提出了连通性受限经验依赖的观点。功能发育受到先天解剖连接、经验和行为需求的制约。婴儿大脑皮层具有多能性,相同的解剖限制会发展成不同的功能结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Developing cortex is functionally pluripotent: Evidence from blindness

How rigidly does innate architecture constrain function of developing cortex? What is the contribution of early experience? We review insights into these questions from visual cortex function in people born blind. In blindness, occipital cortices are active during auditory and tactile tasks. What ‘cross-modal’ plasticity tells us about cortical flexibility is debated. On the one hand, visual networks of blind people respond to higher cognitive information, such as sentence grammar, suggesting drastic repurposing. On the other, in line with ‘metamodal’ accounts, sighted and blind populations show shared domain preferences in ventral occipito-temporal cortex (vOTC), suggesting visual areas switch input modality but perform the same or similar perceptual functions (e.g., face recognition) in blindness. Here we bring these disparate literatures together, reviewing and synthesizing evidence that speaks to whether visual cortices have similar or different functions in blind and sighted people. Together, the evidence suggests that in blindness, visual cortices are incorporated into higher-cognitive (e.g., fronto-parietal) networks, which are a major source long-range input to the visual system. We propose the connectivity-constrained experience-dependent account. Functional development is constrained by innate anatomical connectivity, experience and behavioral needs. Infant cortex is pluripotent, the same anatomical constraints develop into different functional outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.60%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes theoretical and research papers on cognitive brain development, from infancy through childhood and adolescence and into adulthood. It covers neurocognitive development and neurocognitive processing in both typical and atypical development, including social and affective aspects. Appropriate methodologies for the journal include, but are not limited to, functional neuroimaging (fMRI and MEG), electrophysiology (EEG and ERP), NIRS and transcranial magnetic stimulation, as well as other basic neuroscience approaches using cellular and animal models that directly address cognitive brain development, patient studies, case studies, post-mortem studies and pharmacological studies.
期刊最新文献
Early childhood family threat and longitudinal amygdala-mPFC circuit development: Examining cortical thickness and gray matter-white matter contrast Measurement of emerging neurocognitive and language skills in the HEALthy Brain and Child Development (HBCD) study Editorial Board/Aims and Scope Cognitive control processes and emotion regulation in adolescence: Examining the impact of affective inhibition and heart-rate-variability on emotion regulation dynamics in daily life Exploring the late maturation of an intrinsic episodic memory network: A resting-state fMRI study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1