西罗莫司免疫抑制对肝移植心血管预后的影响

Ho Jason , Breslin Zachary , Lally Lauren , Halegoua-DeMarzio Dina , Tholey Danielle
{"title":"西罗莫司免疫抑制对肝移植心血管预后的影响","authors":"Ho Jason ,&nbsp;Breslin Zachary ,&nbsp;Lally Lauren ,&nbsp;Halegoua-DeMarzio Dina ,&nbsp;Tholey Danielle","doi":"10.1016/j.liver.2024.100211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a rising cause of liver transplantation and is linked to higher rates of cardiovascular complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of post-transplant cardiac events in patients with NASH that were exposed to sirolimus (SRL) vs. calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI) immunosuppression.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively reviewed all adult liver transplant recipients at our institution between 2002 and 2020. Subjects were grouped based on immunosuppressive regimen. We also analyzed the subgroup of patients with NASH as the primary indication for transplant, as well as a non-NASH subpopulation. The primary outcome measure was risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) post-transplant. Comparisons between groups were conducted with chi-squared tests. Univariate Cox regression and multivariate time-dependent Cox regression models were used to analyze the relationship between immunosuppression and MACE risk.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>803 liver transplant patients met criteria for study inclusion. Of these, 169 patients had NASH as their primary indication for liver transplant. 18 % of the study population received SRL immunosuppression post-transplant, and the remainder received only CNI immunosuppression. Post-transplant MACE occurred in 32.65 % of patients on SRL compared to 10.27 % in patients on CNI immunosuppression (<em>p</em> =&lt; 0.001). Without taking development of post-transplant CKD into account, our study showed a significantly higher risk of MACE with SRL immunosuppression in both the non-NASH cohort (HR 1.67, <em>p</em> = 0.036) and the NASH cohort (HR 2.48, <em>p</em> = 0.037. However, when accounting for post-transplant CKD, our analysis of the Non-NASH and NASH cohorts did not show a significantly greater risk of post-transplant MACE with SRL compared to CNI immunosuppression.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our analysis shows that in both the NASH and non-NASH cohorts, liver transplant patients on sirolimus did not have a significantly higher risk of developing cardiovascular disease after transplant compared to immunosuppression with calcineurin inhibitors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100799,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Liver Transplantation","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100211"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666967624000126/pdfft?md5=abc66d3a3bb07f5ce8bb95f336ea1beb&pid=1-s2.0-S2666967624000126-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Sirolimus Immunosuppression on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Liver Transplantation\",\"authors\":\"Ho Jason ,&nbsp;Breslin Zachary ,&nbsp;Lally Lauren ,&nbsp;Halegoua-DeMarzio Dina ,&nbsp;Tholey Danielle\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.liver.2024.100211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a rising cause of liver transplantation and is linked to higher rates of cardiovascular complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of post-transplant cardiac events in patients with NASH that were exposed to sirolimus (SRL) vs. calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI) immunosuppression.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively reviewed all adult liver transplant recipients at our institution between 2002 and 2020. Subjects were grouped based on immunosuppressive regimen. We also analyzed the subgroup of patients with NASH as the primary indication for transplant, as well as a non-NASH subpopulation. The primary outcome measure was risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) post-transplant. Comparisons between groups were conducted with chi-squared tests. Univariate Cox regression and multivariate time-dependent Cox regression models were used to analyze the relationship between immunosuppression and MACE risk.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>803 liver transplant patients met criteria for study inclusion. Of these, 169 patients had NASH as their primary indication for liver transplant. 18 % of the study population received SRL immunosuppression post-transplant, and the remainder received only CNI immunosuppression. Post-transplant MACE occurred in 32.65 % of patients on SRL compared to 10.27 % in patients on CNI immunosuppression (<em>p</em> =&lt; 0.001). Without taking development of post-transplant CKD into account, our study showed a significantly higher risk of MACE with SRL immunosuppression in both the non-NASH cohort (HR 1.67, <em>p</em> = 0.036) and the NASH cohort (HR 2.48, <em>p</em> = 0.037. However, when accounting for post-transplant CKD, our analysis of the Non-NASH and NASH cohorts did not show a significantly greater risk of post-transplant MACE with SRL compared to CNI immunosuppression.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our analysis shows that in both the NASH and non-NASH cohorts, liver transplant patients on sirolimus did not have a significantly higher risk of developing cardiovascular disease after transplant compared to immunosuppression with calcineurin inhibitors.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Liver Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100211\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666967624000126/pdfft?md5=abc66d3a3bb07f5ce8bb95f336ea1beb&pid=1-s2.0-S2666967624000126-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Liver Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666967624000126\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Liver Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666967624000126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:非酒精性脂肪性肝炎(NASH)是肝移植的一个新病因,与较高的心血管并发症发生率有关。本研究旨在评估接受西罗莫司(SRL)与钙神经蛋白抑制剂(CNI)免疫抑制的NASH患者移植后发生心脏事件的风险。根据免疫抑制方案对受试者进行分组。我们还分析了以 NASH 为主要移植适应症的患者亚群以及非 NASH 亚群。主要结果指标是移植后发生主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的风险。组间比较采用卡方检验。采用单变量 Cox 回归和多变量时间依赖性 Cox 回归模型分析免疫抑制与 MACE 风险之间的关系。其中,169 名患者的主要肝移植适应症为 NASH。18%的研究对象在移植后接受了SRL免疫抑制,其余患者仅接受了CNI免疫抑制。接受 SRL 治疗的患者中有 32.65% 在移植后发生 MACE,而接受 CNI 免疫抑制的患者中只有 10.27% 发生 MACE(p =< 0.001)。在不考虑移植后 CKD 发展的情况下,我们的研究显示,在非 NASH 队列(HR 1.67,p = 0.036)和 NASH 队列(HR 2.48,p = 0.037)中,SRL 免疫抑制的 MACE 风险明显更高。结论我们的分析表明,在 NASH 和非 NASH 队列中,与使用钙神经蛋白酶抑制剂的免疫抑制相比,使用西罗莫司的肝移植患者在移植后患心血管疾病的风险并没有明显增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Effect of Sirolimus Immunosuppression on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Liver Transplantation

Introduction

Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a rising cause of liver transplantation and is linked to higher rates of cardiovascular complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of post-transplant cardiac events in patients with NASH that were exposed to sirolimus (SRL) vs. calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI) immunosuppression.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed all adult liver transplant recipients at our institution between 2002 and 2020. Subjects were grouped based on immunosuppressive regimen. We also analyzed the subgroup of patients with NASH as the primary indication for transplant, as well as a non-NASH subpopulation. The primary outcome measure was risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) post-transplant. Comparisons between groups were conducted with chi-squared tests. Univariate Cox regression and multivariate time-dependent Cox regression models were used to analyze the relationship between immunosuppression and MACE risk.

Results

803 liver transplant patients met criteria for study inclusion. Of these, 169 patients had NASH as their primary indication for liver transplant. 18 % of the study population received SRL immunosuppression post-transplant, and the remainder received only CNI immunosuppression. Post-transplant MACE occurred in 32.65 % of patients on SRL compared to 10.27 % in patients on CNI immunosuppression (p =< 0.001). Without taking development of post-transplant CKD into account, our study showed a significantly higher risk of MACE with SRL immunosuppression in both the non-NASH cohort (HR 1.67, p = 0.036) and the NASH cohort (HR 2.48, p = 0.037. However, when accounting for post-transplant CKD, our analysis of the Non-NASH and NASH cohorts did not show a significantly greater risk of post-transplant MACE with SRL compared to CNI immunosuppression.

Conclusions

Our analysis shows that in both the NASH and non-NASH cohorts, liver transplant patients on sirolimus did not have a significantly higher risk of developing cardiovascular disease after transplant compared to immunosuppression with calcineurin inhibitors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Molecular evidence of solitary lung metastasis as the initial recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma a decade more after liver transplantation Incidental hepatocellular carcinoma in explanted livers: Prevalence, prognosis and features Editorial board Contents Immunotherapy in liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: A comprehensive review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1