Matthew Murphy , Lorraine Scanlon , Mutaz Elamin , Charles O'Connor , Nick Mayer , Ciaran Brady , Derek Hennessey
{"title":"Teflon® 故事中的 STING:输尿管下经尿道注入聚四氟乙烯糊剂治疗膀胱输尿管反流后的延迟性输尿管梗阻。","authors":"Matthew Murphy , Lorraine Scanlon , Mutaz Elamin , Charles O'Connor , Nick Mayer , Ciaran Brady , Derek Hennessey","doi":"10.1016/j.surge.2024.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div><span>“Subureteric Teflon<span> INGection” (STING) of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE/polytef) paste to treat vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in children was popularised in 1984. It was later abandoned as an implantation material because of the possibility of migration from the </span></span>injection site<span><span><span>. Giant-cell foreign-body granuloma to Polytef in the </span>bladder is a rare cause of </span>ureteric obstruction. Only a handful of cases have been reported in the literature.</span></div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a prospective analysis of a series of 6 adult patients who had childhood STING and presented with foreign-body granuloma to Polytef in the bladder. We report their clinical presentation, findings and treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div><span><span>1 male and 5 females with a history of STING procedure in childhood for VUR presented in later life with foreign-body granuloma to Polytef. The median age at first STING procedure and at presentation to the Urology Department was 3 and 34 years respectively. The most common clinical presentations were </span>flank pain and </span>urinary tract infection<span> (UTI) and all patients had radiological findings<span> of calcified lesions at the vesicoureteric junction(s). 4 patients had histological findings of giant-cell foreign-body granuloma. 4 patients required definitive ureteric reimplantation.</span></span></div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Polytef granuloma causing distal ureteric obstruction<span> may give rise to significant morbidity and renal damage. Due to the likelihood of progression of the granuloma, excision and ureteric reimplantation is considered the standard approach in the management of patients with viable kidneys.</span></div></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><div>Level 5.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49463,"journal":{"name":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","volume":"22 6","pages":"Pages 377-382"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The STING in the tale of Teflon®: Delayed ureteric obstruction after subureteric transurethral injection with polytetrafluoroethylene paste for vesicoureteral reflux\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Murphy , Lorraine Scanlon , Mutaz Elamin , Charles O'Connor , Nick Mayer , Ciaran Brady , Derek Hennessey\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.surge.2024.02.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div><span>“Subureteric Teflon<span> INGection” (STING) of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE/polytef) paste to treat vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in children was popularised in 1984. It was later abandoned as an implantation material because of the possibility of migration from the </span></span>injection site<span><span><span>. Giant-cell foreign-body granuloma to Polytef in the </span>bladder is a rare cause of </span>ureteric obstruction. Only a handful of cases have been reported in the literature.</span></div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a prospective analysis of a series of 6 adult patients who had childhood STING and presented with foreign-body granuloma to Polytef in the bladder. We report their clinical presentation, findings and treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div><span><span>1 male and 5 females with a history of STING procedure in childhood for VUR presented in later life with foreign-body granuloma to Polytef. The median age at first STING procedure and at presentation to the Urology Department was 3 and 34 years respectively. The most common clinical presentations were </span>flank pain and </span>urinary tract infection<span> (UTI) and all patients had radiological findings<span> of calcified lesions at the vesicoureteric junction(s). 4 patients had histological findings of giant-cell foreign-body granuloma. 4 patients required definitive ureteric reimplantation.</span></span></div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Polytef granuloma causing distal ureteric obstruction<span> may give rise to significant morbidity and renal damage. Due to the likelihood of progression of the granuloma, excision and ureteric reimplantation is considered the standard approach in the management of patients with viable kidneys.</span></div></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><div>Level 5.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland\",\"volume\":\"22 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 377-382\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1479666X24000167\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1479666X24000167","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The STING in the tale of Teflon®: Delayed ureteric obstruction after subureteric transurethral injection with polytetrafluoroethylene paste for vesicoureteral reflux
Introduction
“Subureteric Teflon INGection” (STING) of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE/polytef) paste to treat vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in children was popularised in 1984. It was later abandoned as an implantation material because of the possibility of migration from the injection site. Giant-cell foreign-body granuloma to Polytef in the bladder is a rare cause of ureteric obstruction. Only a handful of cases have been reported in the literature.
Methods
We performed a prospective analysis of a series of 6 adult patients who had childhood STING and presented with foreign-body granuloma to Polytef in the bladder. We report their clinical presentation, findings and treatment.
Results
1 male and 5 females with a history of STING procedure in childhood for VUR presented in later life with foreign-body granuloma to Polytef. The median age at first STING procedure and at presentation to the Urology Department was 3 and 34 years respectively. The most common clinical presentations were flank pain and urinary tract infection (UTI) and all patients had radiological findings of calcified lesions at the vesicoureteric junction(s). 4 patients had histological findings of giant-cell foreign-body granuloma. 4 patients required definitive ureteric reimplantation.
Conclusion
Polytef granuloma causing distal ureteric obstruction may give rise to significant morbidity and renal damage. Due to the likelihood of progression of the granuloma, excision and ureteric reimplantation is considered the standard approach in the management of patients with viable kidneys.
期刊介绍:
Since its establishment in 2003, The Surgeon has established itself as one of the leading multidisciplinary surgical titles, both in print and online. The Surgeon is published for the worldwide surgical and dental communities. The goal of the Journal is to achieve wider national and international recognition, through a commitment to excellence in original research. In addition, both Colleges see the Journal as an important educational service, and consequently there is a particular focus on post-graduate development. Much of our educational role will continue to be achieved through publishing expanded review articles by leaders in their field.
Articles in related areas to surgery and dentistry, such as healthcare management and education, are also welcomed. We aim to educate, entertain, give insight into new surgical techniques and technology, and provide a forum for debate and discussion.