代谢功能障碍相关脂肪肝患者肝脏和心血管事件风险的血糖控制目标。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Hepatology Research Pub Date : 2024-02-24 DOI:10.1111/hepr.14025
Nobuharu Tamaki, Shun-Ichi Wakabayashi, Takefumi Kimura, Yutaka Yasui, Kaoru Tsuchiya, Hiroyuki Nakanishi, Daniel Q. Huang, Takeji Umemura, Masayuki Kurosaki, Namiki Izumi
{"title":"代谢功能障碍相关脂肪肝患者肝脏和心血管事件风险的血糖控制目标。","authors":"Nobuharu Tamaki,&nbsp;Shun-Ichi Wakabayashi,&nbsp;Takefumi Kimura,&nbsp;Yutaka Yasui,&nbsp;Kaoru Tsuchiya,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Nakanishi,&nbsp;Daniel Q. Huang,&nbsp;Takeji Umemura,&nbsp;Masayuki Kurosaki,&nbsp;Namiki Izumi","doi":"10.1111/hepr.14025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Optimizing glycemic control may prevent liver-related events and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). However, the optimal hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) threshold associated with a lower risk of complications, particularly liver-related events as well as MACE is unknown.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We investigated a nationwide population-based cohort and identified 633 279 patients with MASLD, with a mean follow-up of 4.2 years. Hemoglobin A1c levels were measured annually. The primary endpoint was the risk of liver-related events and MACE and to determine the optimal HbA1c level associated with the risk of complications.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Mean HbA1c (per 1%) was associated with liver-related events (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR] 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12–1.42) as well as MACE (sHR 1.36; 95% CI, 1.32–1.41) after adjustment for confounders. Multivariable sHR (95% CI) for HbA1c of &lt;5.0%, 6.0%–6.9%, 7.0%–7.9%, 8.0%–8.9%, and ≥9.0% (reference, 5.0%–5.9%) were 14 (9.1–22), 1.70 (1.2–2.3), 3.32 (2.3–4.8), 3.81 (2.1–6.8), and 4.83 (2.4–9.6) for liver-related events, and 1.24 (0.8–1.8), 1.27 (1.2–1.4), 1.70 (1.5–2.0), 2.36 (1.9–2.9), and 4.17 (3.5–5.0) for MACE. An HbA1c level of 7% was selected as the optimal threshold for predicting complications (sHR 2.40 [1.8–3.2] for liver-related events and 1.98 [1.8–2.2] for MACE).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The risk of liver-related events as well as MACE increased in a dose-dependent fashion with an increase in HbA1c levels, except for patients with HbA1c &lt;5.0% for liver-related events. An HbA1c level of 7% was the optimal threshold associated with a lower risk of complications and may be utilized as a target for glycemic control in patients with MASLD.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12987,"journal":{"name":"Hepatology Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Glycemic control target for liver and cardiovascular events risk in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease\",\"authors\":\"Nobuharu Tamaki,&nbsp;Shun-Ichi Wakabayashi,&nbsp;Takefumi Kimura,&nbsp;Yutaka Yasui,&nbsp;Kaoru Tsuchiya,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Nakanishi,&nbsp;Daniel Q. Huang,&nbsp;Takeji Umemura,&nbsp;Masayuki Kurosaki,&nbsp;Namiki Izumi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/hepr.14025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>Optimizing glycemic control may prevent liver-related events and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). However, the optimal hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) threshold associated with a lower risk of complications, particularly liver-related events as well as MACE is unknown.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We investigated a nationwide population-based cohort and identified 633 279 patients with MASLD, with a mean follow-up of 4.2 years. Hemoglobin A1c levels were measured annually. The primary endpoint was the risk of liver-related events and MACE and to determine the optimal HbA1c level associated with the risk of complications.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Mean HbA1c (per 1%) was associated with liver-related events (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR] 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12–1.42) as well as MACE (sHR 1.36; 95% CI, 1.32–1.41) after adjustment for confounders. Multivariable sHR (95% CI) for HbA1c of &lt;5.0%, 6.0%–6.9%, 7.0%–7.9%, 8.0%–8.9%, and ≥9.0% (reference, 5.0%–5.9%) were 14 (9.1–22), 1.70 (1.2–2.3), 3.32 (2.3–4.8), 3.81 (2.1–6.8), and 4.83 (2.4–9.6) for liver-related events, and 1.24 (0.8–1.8), 1.27 (1.2–1.4), 1.70 (1.5–2.0), 2.36 (1.9–2.9), and 4.17 (3.5–5.0) for MACE. An HbA1c level of 7% was selected as the optimal threshold for predicting complications (sHR 2.40 [1.8–3.2] for liver-related events and 1.98 [1.8–2.2] for MACE).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The risk of liver-related events as well as MACE increased in a dose-dependent fashion with an increase in HbA1c levels, except for patients with HbA1c &lt;5.0% for liver-related events. An HbA1c level of 7% was the optimal threshold associated with a lower risk of complications and may be utilized as a target for glycemic control in patients with MASLD.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12987,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hepatology Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hepatology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hepr.14025\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hepr.14025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:优化血糖控制可预防代谢功能障碍相关性脂肪性肝病(MASLD)患者发生肝脏相关事件和主要不良心血管事件(MACE)。然而,与降低并发症(尤其是肝脏相关事件和 MACE)风险相关的最佳血红蛋白 A1c(HbA1c)阈值尚不清楚:我们对全国范围内的人群进行了调查,确定了 633 279 名 MASLD 患者,平均随访时间为 4.2 年。血红蛋白 A1c 水平每年测量一次。主要终点是肝脏相关事件和 MACE 的风险,并确定与并发症风险相关的最佳 HbA1c 水平:调整混杂因素后,平均 HbA1c(每 1%)与肝脏相关事件(亚分布危险比 [sHR] 1.26;95% 置信区间 [CI],1.12-1.42)和 MACE(sHR 1.36;95% CI,1.32-1.41)相关。结论:HbA1c 的多变量 sHR (95% CI):随着 HbA1c 水平的升高,肝脏相关事件和 MACE 的风险呈剂量依赖性增加,但 HbA1c 为 0.5 的患者除外。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Glycemic control target for liver and cardiovascular events risk in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease

Aims

Optimizing glycemic control may prevent liver-related events and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). However, the optimal hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) threshold associated with a lower risk of complications, particularly liver-related events as well as MACE is unknown.

Methods

We investigated a nationwide population-based cohort and identified 633 279 patients with MASLD, with a mean follow-up of 4.2 years. Hemoglobin A1c levels were measured annually. The primary endpoint was the risk of liver-related events and MACE and to determine the optimal HbA1c level associated with the risk of complications.

Results

Mean HbA1c (per 1%) was associated with liver-related events (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR] 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12–1.42) as well as MACE (sHR 1.36; 95% CI, 1.32–1.41) after adjustment for confounders. Multivariable sHR (95% CI) for HbA1c of <5.0%, 6.0%–6.9%, 7.0%–7.9%, 8.0%–8.9%, and ≥9.0% (reference, 5.0%–5.9%) were 14 (9.1–22), 1.70 (1.2–2.3), 3.32 (2.3–4.8), 3.81 (2.1–6.8), and 4.83 (2.4–9.6) for liver-related events, and 1.24 (0.8–1.8), 1.27 (1.2–1.4), 1.70 (1.5–2.0), 2.36 (1.9–2.9), and 4.17 (3.5–5.0) for MACE. An HbA1c level of 7% was selected as the optimal threshold for predicting complications (sHR 2.40 [1.8–3.2] for liver-related events and 1.98 [1.8–2.2] for MACE).

Conclusion

The risk of liver-related events as well as MACE increased in a dose-dependent fashion with an increase in HbA1c levels, except for patients with HbA1c <5.0% for liver-related events. An HbA1c level of 7% was the optimal threshold associated with a lower risk of complications and may be utilized as a target for glycemic control in patients with MASLD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hepatology Research
Hepatology Research 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
124
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Hepatology Research (formerly International Hepatology Communications) is the official journal of the Japan Society of Hepatology, and publishes original articles, reviews and short comunications dealing with hepatology. Reviews or mini-reviews are especially welcomed from those areas within hepatology undergoing rapid changes. Short communications should contain concise definitive information.
期刊最新文献
Distinct characteristics of MetALD (metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease with greater alcohol consumption) in the general population. Unveiling the dynamics of hepatitis C virus transmission among injection drug users and men who have sex with men: A comprehensive study in Japan. Issue Information Diagnostic accuracy of hepatitis E virus antibody tests: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Risk model for predicting failure to rescue after hepatectomy: Cohort study of 1371 consecutive patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1