{"title":"慢性病患者的治疗负担与远程医疗技术使用之间的关系:范围综述","authors":"Farah Tahsin , Tamara Bahr , James Shaw , Aviv Shachak , Carolyn Steele Gray","doi":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Patients managing chronic conditions often face significant treatment burdens due to the long-term nature of their care. Treatment burden refers to the workload associated with the self-management of chronic conditions. While telehealth is commonly used to support these patients, there is a growing concern about its impact on marginalized patient populations. Specifically, we lack a comprehensive overview on how and what types of telehealth can increase or minimize the perceived treatment burden among this patient population.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To synthesize evidence on the relationship between treatment burden and telehealth among patients with chronic conditions and their caregivers.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used Arksey and O'Malley's five-step scoping review framework to identify relevant literature that was published from January 2004 to May 2023.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Fifty-four studies were included in the review. We identified various ways telehealth increases or minimizes patients’ treatment burden. Some of the patient-reported benefits of telehealth regarding treatment burden were reducing time and cost associated with travel to the clinics. Conversely, some burdens associated with telehealth were making sense of the large volume of complex data generated by health technologies, and the extra work required to set up and learn about new technology.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Review findings emphasize the importance of considering the concept of treatment burden while introducing telehealth-based interventions to support patients and their caregivers with chronic conditions. Future research needs to identify how to minimize the treatment burden associated with telehealth while implementing new telehealth interventions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48672,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy and Technology","volume":"13 2","pages":"Article 100855"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883724000182/pdfft?md5=a06fdd2f921e019c732bcb478b677390&pid=1-s2.0-S2211883724000182-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The relationship between treatment burden and the use of telehealth technologies among patients with chronic conditions: A scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Farah Tahsin , Tamara Bahr , James Shaw , Aviv Shachak , Carolyn Steele Gray\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100855\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Patients managing chronic conditions often face significant treatment burdens due to the long-term nature of their care. Treatment burden refers to the workload associated with the self-management of chronic conditions. While telehealth is commonly used to support these patients, there is a growing concern about its impact on marginalized patient populations. Specifically, we lack a comprehensive overview on how and what types of telehealth can increase or minimize the perceived treatment burden among this patient population.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To synthesize evidence on the relationship between treatment burden and telehealth among patients with chronic conditions and their caregivers.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used Arksey and O'Malley's five-step scoping review framework to identify relevant literature that was published from January 2004 to May 2023.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Fifty-four studies were included in the review. We identified various ways telehealth increases or minimizes patients’ treatment burden. Some of the patient-reported benefits of telehealth regarding treatment burden were reducing time and cost associated with travel to the clinics. Conversely, some burdens associated with telehealth were making sense of the large volume of complex data generated by health technologies, and the extra work required to set up and learn about new technology.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Review findings emphasize the importance of considering the concept of treatment burden while introducing telehealth-based interventions to support patients and their caregivers with chronic conditions. Future research needs to identify how to minimize the treatment burden associated with telehealth while implementing new telehealth interventions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Policy and Technology\",\"volume\":\"13 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100855\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883724000182/pdfft?md5=a06fdd2f921e019c732bcb478b677390&pid=1-s2.0-S2211883724000182-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Policy and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883724000182\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883724000182","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
The relationship between treatment burden and the use of telehealth technologies among patients with chronic conditions: A scoping review
Background
Patients managing chronic conditions often face significant treatment burdens due to the long-term nature of their care. Treatment burden refers to the workload associated with the self-management of chronic conditions. While telehealth is commonly used to support these patients, there is a growing concern about its impact on marginalized patient populations. Specifically, we lack a comprehensive overview on how and what types of telehealth can increase or minimize the perceived treatment burden among this patient population.
Objective
To synthesize evidence on the relationship between treatment burden and telehealth among patients with chronic conditions and their caregivers.
Methods
We used Arksey and O'Malley's five-step scoping review framework to identify relevant literature that was published from January 2004 to May 2023.
Results
Fifty-four studies were included in the review. We identified various ways telehealth increases or minimizes patients’ treatment burden. Some of the patient-reported benefits of telehealth regarding treatment burden were reducing time and cost associated with travel to the clinics. Conversely, some burdens associated with telehealth were making sense of the large volume of complex data generated by health technologies, and the extra work required to set up and learn about new technology.
Conclusion
Review findings emphasize the importance of considering the concept of treatment burden while introducing telehealth-based interventions to support patients and their caregivers with chronic conditions. Future research needs to identify how to minimize the treatment burden associated with telehealth while implementing new telehealth interventions.
期刊介绍:
Health Policy and Technology (HPT), is the official journal of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine (FPM), a cross-disciplinary journal, which focuses on past, present and future health policy and the role of technology in clinical and non-clinical national and international health environments.
HPT provides a further excellent way for the FPM to continue to make important national and international contributions to development of policy and practice within medicine and related disciplines. The aim of HPT is to publish relevant, timely and accessible articles and commentaries to support policy-makers, health professionals, health technology providers, patient groups and academia interested in health policy and technology.
Topics covered by HPT will include:
- Health technology, including drug discovery, diagnostics, medicines, devices, therapeutic delivery and eHealth systems
- Cross-national comparisons on health policy using evidence-based approaches
- National studies on health policy to determine the outcomes of technology-driven initiatives
- Cross-border eHealth including health tourism
- The digital divide in mobility, access and affordability of healthcare
- Health technology assessment (HTA) methods and tools for evaluating the effectiveness of clinical and non-clinical health technologies
- Health and eHealth indicators and benchmarks (measure/metrics) for understanding the adoption and diffusion of health technologies
- Health and eHealth models and frameworks to support policy-makers and other stakeholders in decision-making
- Stakeholder engagement with health technologies (clinical and patient/citizen buy-in)
- Regulation and health economics