错误定价与算法交易

IF 5 3区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Information Systems Research Pub Date : 2024-02-19 DOI:10.1287/isre.2021.0570
Lihong Zhang, Xiaoquan (Michael) Zhang
{"title":"错误定价与算法交易","authors":"Lihong Zhang, Xiaoquan (Michael) Zhang","doi":"10.1287/isre.2021.0570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study relaxes the efficient market hypothesis by introducing a model that accounts for initial mispricing and explores the effects of algorithmic trading. The research finds that algorithmic strategies can cause significant market volatility and affect financial stability, particularly when they amplify overpricing, leading to bubbles and crashes. Key insights include: Initial mispricing is crucial for algorithmic trading to impact market prices. Market reactions vary with the direction of the trading strategy relative to the asset’s true value. Informed traders can benefit from mispricing, whereas noise traders typically incur losses.Policy implications suggest that algorithmic trading is not universally harmful; its effects depend on the alignment of trading strategies with accurate pricing. The study advises regulators to differentiate between stabilizing and destabilizing trading practices. For traders, the research highlights the importance of adaptive strategies that help correct mispricing to ensure long-term profitability and market health. This research advances our understanding of algorithmic trading’s dual potential and informs the development of more nuanced financial regulations and trading strategies.","PeriodicalId":48411,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Research","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mispricing and Algorithm Trading\",\"authors\":\"Lihong Zhang, Xiaoquan (Michael) Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1287/isre.2021.0570\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study relaxes the efficient market hypothesis by introducing a model that accounts for initial mispricing and explores the effects of algorithmic trading. The research finds that algorithmic strategies can cause significant market volatility and affect financial stability, particularly when they amplify overpricing, leading to bubbles and crashes. Key insights include: Initial mispricing is crucial for algorithmic trading to impact market prices. Market reactions vary with the direction of the trading strategy relative to the asset’s true value. Informed traders can benefit from mispricing, whereas noise traders typically incur losses.Policy implications suggest that algorithmic trading is not universally harmful; its effects depend on the alignment of trading strategies with accurate pricing. The study advises regulators to differentiate between stabilizing and destabilizing trading practices. For traders, the research highlights the importance of adaptive strategies that help correct mispricing to ensure long-term profitability and market health. This research advances our understanding of algorithmic trading’s dual potential and informs the development of more nuanced financial regulations and trading strategies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Systems Research\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Systems Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2021.0570\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Systems Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2021.0570","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究放宽了有效市场假说,引入了一个考虑初始错误定价的模型,并探讨了算法交易的影响。研究发现,算法策略会导致市场大幅波动并影响金融稳定,尤其是当算法策略放大过度定价,导致泡沫和崩溃时。主要见解包括初始错误定价是算法交易影响市场价格的关键。相对于资产的真实价值,市场反应随交易策略的方向而变化。政策影响表明,算法交易并非普遍有害;其影响取决于交易策略与准确定价的一致性。研究建议监管机构区分稳定和不稳定的交易行为。对于交易者来说,研究强调了有助于纠正错误定价的适应性策略的重要性,以确保长期盈利能力和市场健康。这项研究加深了我们对算法交易双重潜力的理解,为制定更细致入微的金融监管和交易策略提供了参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mispricing and Algorithm Trading
This study relaxes the efficient market hypothesis by introducing a model that accounts for initial mispricing and explores the effects of algorithmic trading. The research finds that algorithmic strategies can cause significant market volatility and affect financial stability, particularly when they amplify overpricing, leading to bubbles and crashes. Key insights include: Initial mispricing is crucial for algorithmic trading to impact market prices. Market reactions vary with the direction of the trading strategy relative to the asset’s true value. Informed traders can benefit from mispricing, whereas noise traders typically incur losses.Policy implications suggest that algorithmic trading is not universally harmful; its effects depend on the alignment of trading strategies with accurate pricing. The study advises regulators to differentiate between stabilizing and destabilizing trading practices. For traders, the research highlights the importance of adaptive strategies that help correct mispricing to ensure long-term profitability and market health. This research advances our understanding of algorithmic trading’s dual potential and informs the development of more nuanced financial regulations and trading strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
8.20%
发文量
120
期刊介绍: ISR (Information Systems Research) is a journal of INFORMS, the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences. Information Systems Research is a leading international journal of theory, research, and intellectual development, focused on information systems in organizations, institutions, the economy, and society.
期刊最新文献
Win by Hook or Crook? Self-Injecting Favorable Online Reviews to Fight Adjacent Rivals Omnificence or Differentiation? An Empirical Study of Knowledge Structure and Career Development of IT Workers Timely Quality Problem Resolution in Peer-Production Systems: The Impact of Bots, Policy Citations, and Contributor Experience Does David Make A Goliath? Impact of Rival’s Expertise Signals on Online User Engagement How to Make My Bug Bounty Cost-Effective? A Game-Theoretical Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1