以过程和结果为导向的评审对医疗服务销售的影响

IF 5 3区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Information Systems Research Pub Date : 2024-02-22 DOI:10.1287/isre.2019.0168
Hongfei Li, Jing Peng, Gang Wang, Xue Bai
{"title":"以过程和结果为导向的评审对医疗服务销售的影响","authors":"Hongfei Li, Jing Peng, Gang Wang, Xue Bai","doi":"10.1287/isre.2019.0168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the rise of digital health platforms, consumers increasingly rely on online reviews when choosing healthcare services. Understanding how these reviews shape consumer decisions is crucial for both platforms and healthcare providers. To explore this, we analyzed a comprehensive data set from a leading online cosmetic surgery platform to understand how process-oriented (focusing on the recovery experience) and outcome-oriented (focusing on the end results) reviews influence the demand for healthcare services. Our findings reveal a striking disparity in the effectiveness of these two types of reviews. Generally, outcome-oriented reviews exhibit greater efficacy in boosting sales. However, the influence of each review type varies with the complexity and popularity of the services. Process-oriented reviews are more compelling for complex healthcare services, while outcome-oriented reviews prove more impactful for simpler, popular services. These insights underscore the need for tailored strategies in incentivizing and managing consumer reviews, vital for healthcare providers and digital health platforms. Furthermore, for policy makers, the study highlights the importance of regulating and guiding online review designs to ensure they accurately reflect the service process and outcome, aiding consumers in making informed decisions.","PeriodicalId":48411,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Research","volume":"2015 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Process- vs. Outcome-Oriented Reviews on the Sales of Healthcare Services\",\"authors\":\"Hongfei Li, Jing Peng, Gang Wang, Xue Bai\",\"doi\":\"10.1287/isre.2019.0168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the rise of digital health platforms, consumers increasingly rely on online reviews when choosing healthcare services. Understanding how these reviews shape consumer decisions is crucial for both platforms and healthcare providers. To explore this, we analyzed a comprehensive data set from a leading online cosmetic surgery platform to understand how process-oriented (focusing on the recovery experience) and outcome-oriented (focusing on the end results) reviews influence the demand for healthcare services. Our findings reveal a striking disparity in the effectiveness of these two types of reviews. Generally, outcome-oriented reviews exhibit greater efficacy in boosting sales. However, the influence of each review type varies with the complexity and popularity of the services. Process-oriented reviews are more compelling for complex healthcare services, while outcome-oriented reviews prove more impactful for simpler, popular services. These insights underscore the need for tailored strategies in incentivizing and managing consumer reviews, vital for healthcare providers and digital health platforms. Furthermore, for policy makers, the study highlights the importance of regulating and guiding online review designs to ensure they accurately reflect the service process and outcome, aiding consumers in making informed decisions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Systems Research\",\"volume\":\"2015 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Systems Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2019.0168\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Systems Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2019.0168","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着数字医疗平台的兴起,消费者在选择医疗服务时越来越依赖于在线评论。了解这些评论如何影响消费者的决策对平台和医疗服务提供商都至关重要。为了探讨这个问题,我们分析了一个领先的在线整容手术平台的综合数据集,以了解以过程为导向(关注恢复体验)和以结果为导向(关注最终效果)的评论如何影响医疗服务需求。我们的研究结果表明,这两类评论的效果存在显著差异。一般来说,以结果为导向的评论在促进销售方面表现出更大的功效。然而,每种评论类型的影响力因服务的复杂程度和受欢迎程度而异。以过程为导向的评论对复杂的医疗保健服务更有说服力,而以结果为导向的评论则对简单、受欢迎的服务更有影响力。这些见解突出表明,在激励和管理消费者评论方面需要有针对性的策略,这对医疗服务提供商和数字医疗平台至关重要。此外,对于政策制定者来说,这项研究强调了规范和指导在线评论设计的重要性,以确保它们准确反映服务过程和结果,帮助消费者做出明智的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Impact of Process- vs. Outcome-Oriented Reviews on the Sales of Healthcare Services
With the rise of digital health platforms, consumers increasingly rely on online reviews when choosing healthcare services. Understanding how these reviews shape consumer decisions is crucial for both platforms and healthcare providers. To explore this, we analyzed a comprehensive data set from a leading online cosmetic surgery platform to understand how process-oriented (focusing on the recovery experience) and outcome-oriented (focusing on the end results) reviews influence the demand for healthcare services. Our findings reveal a striking disparity in the effectiveness of these two types of reviews. Generally, outcome-oriented reviews exhibit greater efficacy in boosting sales. However, the influence of each review type varies with the complexity and popularity of the services. Process-oriented reviews are more compelling for complex healthcare services, while outcome-oriented reviews prove more impactful for simpler, popular services. These insights underscore the need for tailored strategies in incentivizing and managing consumer reviews, vital for healthcare providers and digital health platforms. Furthermore, for policy makers, the study highlights the importance of regulating and guiding online review designs to ensure they accurately reflect the service process and outcome, aiding consumers in making informed decisions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
8.20%
发文量
120
期刊介绍: ISR (Information Systems Research) is a journal of INFORMS, the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences. Information Systems Research is a leading international journal of theory, research, and intellectual development, focused on information systems in organizations, institutions, the economy, and society.
期刊最新文献
Win by Hook or Crook? Self-Injecting Favorable Online Reviews to Fight Adjacent Rivals Omnificence or Differentiation? An Empirical Study of Knowledge Structure and Career Development of IT Workers Timely Quality Problem Resolution in Peer-Production Systems: The Impact of Bots, Policy Citations, and Contributor Experience Does David Make A Goliath? Impact of Rival’s Expertise Signals on Online User Engagement How to Make My Bug Bounty Cost-Effective? A Game-Theoretical Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1