应用语言学定性研究中的认识论盗窃和挪用:哈拉卡的教训

IF 2.1 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Applied Linguistics Review Pub Date : 2024-02-23 DOI:10.1515/applirev-2024-0013
Osman Z. Barnawi
{"title":"应用语言学定性研究中的认识论盗窃和挪用:哈拉卡的教训","authors":"Osman Z. Barnawi","doi":"10.1515/applirev-2024-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Within the current turn of decolonization in the field of applied linguistics, the dominant discourses may have little to say about exposing and disrupting the act of <jats:italic>epistemological theft and appropriation</jats:italic> in qualitative research methodologies, even implicitly. <jats:italic>Epistemological theft and appropriation</jats:italic> refer to the (in)deliberate intricate acts of dispossessing the original knowers of their epistemological ownership over certain knowledges in their research practices. This paper introduces and operationalizes <jats:italic>Halaqa</jats:italic> as an alternative way of theorizing and doing qualitative research that is not only anchored in non-western epistemologies but can also be employed as a means for disrupting <jats:italic>theft and appropriation</jats:italic> in literature review and drawing on participants’ narratives within qualitative inquiry. Through a four-month journey of dialogue with three in-service Saudi western-trained language teachers-educators-researchers in our <jats:italic>Halaqa,</jats:italic> we co-explored possible mechanisms that foster legitimate ownership of epistemologies and emphasize appreciating other ways of knowing that may not be necessarily aligned with our perspectives about ELT in applied linguistics research. This paper concludes with a call for a nuanced and continuous process of self-critique and reappraisal that centers ethical, moral and epistemic imperatives while doing a literature review and drawing on participants’ narratives.","PeriodicalId":46472,"journal":{"name":"Applied Linguistics Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Epistemological theft and appropriation in qualitative inquiry in applied linguistics: lessons from Halaqa\",\"authors\":\"Osman Z. Barnawi\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/applirev-2024-0013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Within the current turn of decolonization in the field of applied linguistics, the dominant discourses may have little to say about exposing and disrupting the act of <jats:italic>epistemological theft and appropriation</jats:italic> in qualitative research methodologies, even implicitly. <jats:italic>Epistemological theft and appropriation</jats:italic> refer to the (in)deliberate intricate acts of dispossessing the original knowers of their epistemological ownership over certain knowledges in their research practices. This paper introduces and operationalizes <jats:italic>Halaqa</jats:italic> as an alternative way of theorizing and doing qualitative research that is not only anchored in non-western epistemologies but can also be employed as a means for disrupting <jats:italic>theft and appropriation</jats:italic> in literature review and drawing on participants’ narratives within qualitative inquiry. Through a four-month journey of dialogue with three in-service Saudi western-trained language teachers-educators-researchers in our <jats:italic>Halaqa,</jats:italic> we co-explored possible mechanisms that foster legitimate ownership of epistemologies and emphasize appreciating other ways of knowing that may not be necessarily aligned with our perspectives about ELT in applied linguistics research. This paper concludes with a call for a nuanced and continuous process of self-critique and reappraisal that centers ethical, moral and epistemic imperatives while doing a literature review and drawing on participants’ narratives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Linguistics Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Linguistics Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2024-0013\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Linguistics Review","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2024-0013","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在当前应用语言学领域的非殖民化浪潮中,主流话语对于揭露和瓦解定性研究方法中的认识论盗窃和挪用行为,即使是隐含的,可能也无话可说。认识论盗窃和挪用指的是在研究实践中剥夺原始知识者对某些知识的认识论所有权的(非)故意的复杂行为。本文介绍了 "哈拉卡"(Halaqa),并将其作为理论化和开展定性研究的另一种方式,这种方式不仅立足于非西方认识论,而且还可以作为一种手段,在文献综述中破坏窃取和挪用,并在定性调查中借鉴参与者的叙述。通过与我们哈拉卡的三位接受过西方培训的沙特在职语言教师--教育者--研究者进行为期四个月的对话,我们共同探索了促进认识论合法所有权的可能机制,并强调了欣赏其他认识方式,这些方式可能与我们在应用语言学研究中对英语语言教学的观点不一定一致。本文最后呼吁,在进行文献综述和借鉴参与者的叙述时,应围绕伦理、道德和认识论的要求,开展细致入微、持续不断的自我批判和重新评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Epistemological theft and appropriation in qualitative inquiry in applied linguistics: lessons from Halaqa
Within the current turn of decolonization in the field of applied linguistics, the dominant discourses may have little to say about exposing and disrupting the act of epistemological theft and appropriation in qualitative research methodologies, even implicitly. Epistemological theft and appropriation refer to the (in)deliberate intricate acts of dispossessing the original knowers of their epistemological ownership over certain knowledges in their research practices. This paper introduces and operationalizes Halaqa as an alternative way of theorizing and doing qualitative research that is not only anchored in non-western epistemologies but can also be employed as a means for disrupting theft and appropriation in literature review and drawing on participants’ narratives within qualitative inquiry. Through a four-month journey of dialogue with three in-service Saudi western-trained language teachers-educators-researchers in our Halaqa, we co-explored possible mechanisms that foster legitimate ownership of epistemologies and emphasize appreciating other ways of knowing that may not be necessarily aligned with our perspectives about ELT in applied linguistics research. This paper concludes with a call for a nuanced and continuous process of self-critique and reappraisal that centers ethical, moral and epistemic imperatives while doing a literature review and drawing on participants’ narratives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
81
期刊最新文献
The role of speaker categorization in South Korean attitudes toward North Korean accents “As a Muslim…”: on the importance of intercultural responsibility in transnational cultural exchanges Culture machines When AI meets intercultural communication: new frontiers, new agendas Artificial intelligence and depth ontology: implications for intercultural ethics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1