解读城市规模和社会空间流动性的不平等:英格兰的证据

IF 2.6 3区 经济学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science Pub Date : 2024-02-20 DOI:10.1177/23998083241234137
Qi-Li Gao, Chen Zhong, Yikang Wang
{"title":"解读城市规模和社会空间流动性的不平等:英格兰的证据","authors":"Qi-Li Gao, Chen Zhong, Yikang Wang","doi":"10.1177/23998083241234137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prior research on the scaling of city size and inequality has a primary focus on economic factors such as income. Limited research has addressed socio-spatial disparities in mobility, involving physical activities and social interactions among individuals and population groups. Utilising mobile phone app data, this study measured inequalities using multiple mobility-related indicators (i.e. the number of activity points, the radius of gyration, self-containment, and social interaction indices) and related to population size by scaling models. In England’s context, these indicators unfolding mobility patterns and social issues display different scaling regimes, varying from sublinear to super-linear. It was observed that larger cities are associated with greater social interactions, particularly among socioeconomically advantaged groups; however, they also exhibit exacerbated self-segregation. Due to the radiation effect of big cities, the performances (e.g. travel radius) of small surrounding towns deviate from the predicted values of scaling models. Within cities, the evenness of indicators is independent of population size and produces distinct spatial patterns. The findings expand upon previous research and provide a more nuanced understanding of the complex relationship between city size, urban inequality, and human mobility.","PeriodicalId":11863,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unpacking urban scaling and socio-spatial inequalities in mobility: Evidence from England\",\"authors\":\"Qi-Li Gao, Chen Zhong, Yikang Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23998083241234137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Prior research on the scaling of city size and inequality has a primary focus on economic factors such as income. Limited research has addressed socio-spatial disparities in mobility, involving physical activities and social interactions among individuals and population groups. Utilising mobile phone app data, this study measured inequalities using multiple mobility-related indicators (i.e. the number of activity points, the radius of gyration, self-containment, and social interaction indices) and related to population size by scaling models. In England’s context, these indicators unfolding mobility patterns and social issues display different scaling regimes, varying from sublinear to super-linear. It was observed that larger cities are associated with greater social interactions, particularly among socioeconomically advantaged groups; however, they also exhibit exacerbated self-segregation. Due to the radiation effect of big cities, the performances (e.g. travel radius) of small surrounding towns deviate from the predicted values of scaling models. Within cities, the evenness of indicators is independent of population size and produces distinct spatial patterns. The findings expand upon previous research and provide a more nuanced understanding of the complex relationship between city size, urban inequality, and human mobility.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083241234137\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083241234137","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

之前关于城市规模与不平等比例的研究主要集中在收入等经济因素上。涉及个人和人口群体间身体活动和社会交往的流动性社会空间差异的研究有限。本研究利用手机应用程序数据,使用多个与流动性相关的指标(即活动点数量、回旋半径、自足性和社会互动指数)来衡量不平等现象,并通过缩放模型将其与人口规模联系起来。在英格兰,这些反映流动模式和社会问题的指标显示出不同的缩放机制,从亚线性到超线性不等。据观察,大城市与更多的社会互动有关,特别是在社会经济条件优越的群体中;然而,大城市也表现出更严重的自我隔离。由于大城市的辐射效应,周边小城镇的表现(如旅行半径)偏离了比例模型的预测值。在城市内部,指标的均匀性与人口规模无关,并产生独特的空间模式。这些研究结果拓展了以往的研究,使人们对城市规模、城市不平等和人类流动性之间的复杂关系有了更细致的了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Unpacking urban scaling and socio-spatial inequalities in mobility: Evidence from England
Prior research on the scaling of city size and inequality has a primary focus on economic factors such as income. Limited research has addressed socio-spatial disparities in mobility, involving physical activities and social interactions among individuals and population groups. Utilising mobile phone app data, this study measured inequalities using multiple mobility-related indicators (i.e. the number of activity points, the radius of gyration, self-containment, and social interaction indices) and related to population size by scaling models. In England’s context, these indicators unfolding mobility patterns and social issues display different scaling regimes, varying from sublinear to super-linear. It was observed that larger cities are associated with greater social interactions, particularly among socioeconomically advantaged groups; however, they also exhibit exacerbated self-segregation. Due to the radiation effect of big cities, the performances (e.g. travel radius) of small surrounding towns deviate from the predicted values of scaling models. Within cities, the evenness of indicators is independent of population size and produces distinct spatial patterns. The findings expand upon previous research and provide a more nuanced understanding of the complex relationship between city size, urban inequality, and human mobility.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.40%
发文量
159
期刊最新文献
Investigating urban morphological drivers of household water use in developing economies: A structural equation model approach Towards a more realistic estimation of urban land take by combining cadastral parcels and building footprints A sidewalk-level urban heat risk assessment framework using pedestrian mobility and urban microclimate modeling Mapping sense of place as a measurable urban identity: Using street view images and machine learning to identify building façade materials Visualizing the global deployment of Filipina workers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1