床旁超声监测腹主动脉及其分支峰值流速对脓毒性休克患者容量状态的评估价值

Chen Wenchong
{"title":"床旁超声监测腹主动脉及其分支峰值流速对脓毒性休克患者容量状态的评估价值","authors":"Chen Wenchong","doi":"10.1101/2024.02.22.24303100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"[Abstract] Objective To explore the value of bedside ultrasound in monitoring peak flow velocity of abdominal aorta and its branches in assessing the volume status of patients with septic shock.Methods A total of 80 patients with septic shock admitted to the Foshan Rehabilitation Hospital(The Fifth People's Hospital of Foshan) and the Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital from June 2022 to June 2023 were selected as the research subjects. All patients were treated with mechanical ventilation,and deep venous catheters were placed in the internal jugular vein or subclavian vein to monitor central venous pressure (CVP).PiCCO catheters were placed in the femoral artery to monitor hemodynamic data.At the same time,the maximum internal diameter of the inferior vena cava (IVCmax),the respiratory variation of the inferior vena cava (△IVC),the peak flow velocity of the abdominal aorta (VpeakAA),the peak flow velocity of the celiac artery (VpeakCA),and the peak flow velocity of the superior mesenteric artery (VpeakSMA)were monitored under bedside ultrasound.The global end-diastolic volumn index(GEDI)was used as a grouping indicator,with GEDI≤680ml/m2 as the low-volume group and GEDI≥800ml/m2 as the high-volume group.Compare the differences in peak flow velocity between the abdominal aorta,celiac artery,and superior mesenteric artery between the two groups,and analyze the correlation between peak flow velocity of the abdominal aorta,celiac artery,and superior mesenteric artery and IVCmax,ΔIVC,CVP,and stroke volume variability (SVV);draw a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the subjects,calculate the area under the curve,and find the diagnostic threshold.Results There was no significant difference in general data between the two groups (P>0.05).The VpeakAA,VpeakCA,and VpeakSMA in the high-volume group were all higher than those in the low-volume group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). However,VpeakCA and VpeakSMA were significantly correlated with IVCmax,△IVC,CVP,and SVV (P<0.05).The ROC curve analysis showed that VpeakAA,VpeakCA,and VpeakSMA could effectively evaluate the volume status of patients with septic shock, and the area under the VpeakSMA curve was 0.846,with a 95% confidence interval of 0.693-0.999,and had high sensitivity and specificity.Conclusion Bedside ultrasound can dynamically monitor VpeakAA,VpeakCA,and VpeakSMA,which has great value in the evaluation of volume status in patients with septic shock.","PeriodicalId":501290,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Emergency Medicine","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation value of bedside ultrasound monitoring of peak flow velocity of abdominal aorta and its branches in volume status of patients with septic shock\",\"authors\":\"Chen Wenchong\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.02.22.24303100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"[Abstract] Objective To explore the value of bedside ultrasound in monitoring peak flow velocity of abdominal aorta and its branches in assessing the volume status of patients with septic shock.Methods A total of 80 patients with septic shock admitted to the Foshan Rehabilitation Hospital(The Fifth People's Hospital of Foshan) and the Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital from June 2022 to June 2023 were selected as the research subjects. All patients were treated with mechanical ventilation,and deep venous catheters were placed in the internal jugular vein or subclavian vein to monitor central venous pressure (CVP).PiCCO catheters were placed in the femoral artery to monitor hemodynamic data.At the same time,the maximum internal diameter of the inferior vena cava (IVCmax),the respiratory variation of the inferior vena cava (△IVC),the peak flow velocity of the abdominal aorta (VpeakAA),the peak flow velocity of the celiac artery (VpeakCA),and the peak flow velocity of the superior mesenteric artery (VpeakSMA)were monitored under bedside ultrasound.The global end-diastolic volumn index(GEDI)was used as a grouping indicator,with GEDI≤680ml/m2 as the low-volume group and GEDI≥800ml/m2 as the high-volume group.Compare the differences in peak flow velocity between the abdominal aorta,celiac artery,and superior mesenteric artery between the two groups,and analyze the correlation between peak flow velocity of the abdominal aorta,celiac artery,and superior mesenteric artery and IVCmax,ΔIVC,CVP,and stroke volume variability (SVV);draw a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the subjects,calculate the area under the curve,and find the diagnostic threshold.Results There was no significant difference in general data between the two groups (P>0.05).The VpeakAA,VpeakCA,and VpeakSMA in the high-volume group were all higher than those in the low-volume group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). However,VpeakCA and VpeakSMA were significantly correlated with IVCmax,△IVC,CVP,and SVV (P<0.05).The ROC curve analysis showed that VpeakAA,VpeakCA,and VpeakSMA could effectively evaluate the volume status of patients with septic shock, and the area under the VpeakSMA curve was 0.846,with a 95% confidence interval of 0.693-0.999,and had high sensitivity and specificity.Conclusion Bedside ultrasound can dynamically monitor VpeakAA,VpeakCA,and VpeakSMA,which has great value in the evaluation of volume status in patients with septic shock.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.22.24303100\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.22.24303100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

[摘要] 目的 探讨床旁超声监测腹主动脉及其分支峰值流速对脓毒性休克患者血容量状态的评估价值。 方法 选择2022年6月-2023年6月佛山市康复医院(佛山市第五人民医院)和广东省人民医院收治的脓毒性休克患者共80例作为研究对象。所有患者均接受机械通气治疗,并在颈内静脉或锁骨下静脉置入深静脉导管监测中心静脉压(CVP),在股动脉置入PiCCO导管监测血流动力学数据。同时,床旁超声监测下腔静脉最大内径(IVCmax)、下腔静脉呼吸变异(△IVC)、腹主动脉峰值流速(VpeakAA)、腹腔动脉峰值流速(VpeakCA)和肠系膜上动脉峰值流速(VpeakSMA)。以全局舒张末期容积指数(GEDI)作为分组指标,GEDI≤680ml/m2为低容积组,GEDI≥800ml/m2为高容积组。比较两组间腹主动脉、腹腔动脉和肠系膜上动脉峰值流速的差异,分析腹主动脉、腹腔动脉和肠系膜上动脉峰值流速与 IVCmax、ΔIVC、CVP 和搏出量变异性(SVV)的相关性,绘制受试者的接收者操作特征曲线(ROC),计算曲线下面积,找出诊断阈值。结果 两组一般数据无明显差异(P>0.05)。高容量组的 VpeakAA、VpeakCA 和 VpeakSMA 均高于低容量组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。ROC曲线分析显示,VpeakAA、VpeakCA和VpeakSMA能有效评估脓毒性休克患者的容量状态,VpeakSMA曲线下面积为0.结论 床旁超声可动态监测 VpeakAA、VpeakCA 和 VpeakSMA,对脓毒性休克患者的容量状态评估具有重要价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation value of bedside ultrasound monitoring of peak flow velocity of abdominal aorta and its branches in volume status of patients with septic shock
[Abstract] Objective To explore the value of bedside ultrasound in monitoring peak flow velocity of abdominal aorta and its branches in assessing the volume status of patients with septic shock.Methods A total of 80 patients with septic shock admitted to the Foshan Rehabilitation Hospital(The Fifth People's Hospital of Foshan) and the Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital from June 2022 to June 2023 were selected as the research subjects. All patients were treated with mechanical ventilation,and deep venous catheters were placed in the internal jugular vein or subclavian vein to monitor central venous pressure (CVP).PiCCO catheters were placed in the femoral artery to monitor hemodynamic data.At the same time,the maximum internal diameter of the inferior vena cava (IVCmax),the respiratory variation of the inferior vena cava (△IVC),the peak flow velocity of the abdominal aorta (VpeakAA),the peak flow velocity of the celiac artery (VpeakCA),and the peak flow velocity of the superior mesenteric artery (VpeakSMA)were monitored under bedside ultrasound.The global end-diastolic volumn index(GEDI)was used as a grouping indicator,with GEDI≤680ml/m2 as the low-volume group and GEDI≥800ml/m2 as the high-volume group.Compare the differences in peak flow velocity between the abdominal aorta,celiac artery,and superior mesenteric artery between the two groups,and analyze the correlation between peak flow velocity of the abdominal aorta,celiac artery,and superior mesenteric artery and IVCmax,ΔIVC,CVP,and stroke volume variability (SVV);draw a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the subjects,calculate the area under the curve,and find the diagnostic threshold.Results There was no significant difference in general data between the two groups (P>0.05).The VpeakAA,VpeakCA,and VpeakSMA in the high-volume group were all higher than those in the low-volume group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). However,VpeakCA and VpeakSMA were significantly correlated with IVCmax,△IVC,CVP,and SVV (P<0.05).The ROC curve analysis showed that VpeakAA,VpeakCA,and VpeakSMA could effectively evaluate the volume status of patients with septic shock, and the area under the VpeakSMA curve was 0.846,with a 95% confidence interval of 0.693-0.999,and had high sensitivity and specificity.Conclusion Bedside ultrasound can dynamically monitor VpeakAA,VpeakCA,and VpeakSMA,which has great value in the evaluation of volume status in patients with septic shock.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
In-hospital stay of anemic patients (70-90 g.L-1) in the ED with/without transfusion: a single-center propensity-matched study. Accuracy of the National Early Warning Score version 2 (NEWS2) in predicting need for time-critical treatment: Retrospective observational cohort study What strategies are used to select patients for direct admission under acute medicine services? A systematic review of the literature. Feasibility of mixed-reality telecollaboration to enhance pre-medical student shadowing education Evaluating the Impact of NHS Strikes on Patient Flow through Emergency Departments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1